now that the dust has settled, was it really that bad?
>>63163258
YES
E
S
>>63163258
Too soon OP, you must ask this question
>One Year Later
Bad source material turned into worse movies
"it dosen't matter, people will still pay to see it"
It made money before DVD/Blu-ray sales
>>63163258
is this the end of miles teller carreer?
>>63164710
>33.4%
kek
>>63164758
Nah, he's going to be okay.
>>63163258
It was okay. I've seen worse.
>>63164607
>Based Roger Corman
>>63164710
NO. it didn't. Less than half of that went to the studio.
And there are also unreported 10's of millions added to the budget thanks to re-shoots (the 3d was also cancelled because of this). And this doesn't add the advertising budget.
In the end FOX lost around 100 million.
>>63163258
I know this is a piss take thread but I still enjoyed aspects of Doom, and it had moments where it felt pretty good but by the time it started to pick up it was over and 2 hours had gone by.
It never left phase 1.
>>63164710
Theaters take a substantial cut from ticket sales and in the case of Fantastic 4 there was also millions spent on extensive reshoots that ballooned the budget even higher than it was originally. In the end it was a total flop and lost at least $80 million.
>>63164607
>Roger Corman to this date has still made the best F4 movie
What a world we live in
>>63164989
>And there are also unreported 10's of millions added to the budget thanks to re-shoots
That's included in the $120 million figure, it was originally $100 million