>I like standing next to you, Sean. Makes me look so tough.
Andrew Garfield is a pretty good actor, he was great in The Social Network. Kinda glad he's not going to be associated with Spiderman anymore.
>>63154943
And The Social Network is the best movies of this decade so far
>>63154943
>>63155035
The Social Network is a worthless legal drama filled to the brim with indistinguishable characters and Sorkin zingers. A couple of things about it are good (the last shot of the movie) but people over rate the fuck out of it for no reason at all. There is nothing special about it. You know you're in trouble when Justin Timberlake is giving the best performance.
He angered the nip overlords at Sony, he's never going to work again.
>>63155035
You are correct, this movie kicks endless ass
>>63155103
>You know you're in trouble when Justin Timberlake is giving the best performance.
that's just not true. Andrew Garfield gave the best performance in this film by far.
The fact that the story isn't that interesting but the film is still very gripping is just a testament to the actors' abilities (and Div Fincher and Sorkin ofc)
Also, the opening scene with Rooney was much better than the ending imo. It pretty much set up the entire film - Zuckerberg is a self centered douchebag nerd
>>63155103
>JT giving best performance
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha he wasn't garbage like In Time but are we serious here saying he gave the best performance? Rooney Mara in her five some minutes of screen time was better than Justin. Now I'd say he was a better than Not Michael Cera Eisenberg but come on, a piece of wheat toast could out act Jesse.
You're welcome for the you, master baiter.
>>63155103
It's a perfect movie to describe a generation
>>63155394
No it isn't.
>>63154943
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdiFzcpmmJc
>SOOOOORRY MY PRADA'S AT THE CLEANERS, ALONG WITH MY HOODIE AND MY FUCK YOU FLIP FLOPS, YOU PRETENTIOUS DOUCHEBAG
I don't know how much of the performance was his natural mannerisms but I thought he fit the role well. Same goes for Eisenberg, who was perfectly cast.
>>63155590
>SOOOOORRY MY PRADA'S AT THE CLEANERS, ALONG WITH MY HOODIE AND MY FUCK YOU FLIP FLOPS, YOU PRETENTIOUS DOUCHEBAG
I love how in biopics the characters always talk like they know they're in a biopic.
The Social Network is a well-produced movie but also a total failure. For a remake of Citizen Kane, it doesn't have anything to say about Zuckerberg. At least Welles didn't call his character William Hearst despite his movie ruthlessly deconstructing the image of the insecure rags-to-riches bastard who can't help himself from meddling in all the lives he influences (which eventually extends to the lives of nearly every American). Fincher reduces Facebook to a lame metaphor about how Zuckerberg is always on the outside, unable to fit in because he is a jerk, and despite painting itself as the Facebook story the film makes shit up wholesale when the reality of Zuckerberg's actions are far more insidious than that of the rich loser in Fincher's film.
The Facebook story is the story of how a rich kid with more skill than scruples conned the population of the world into selling every aspect of their identities on an unprecedented scale, and that's not the movie Fincher made. But it's the one Welles would have destroyed his career to produce.
>>63154943
99 homes was pretty decent to be fair
in a just world, he'd go far
>>63155684
So what do you want to see, edgy contrarian fedorafag? A bunch of nerds sitting in a chair all day programming like it happened in real life ?
>>63155837
No i just don't want dialogue that stops half a step before turning to the camera and winking
>>63154943
MARRRRRRRRRKKKKK
>>63155918
>SOOOOORRY MY PRADA'S AT THE CLEANERS, ALONG WITH MY HOODIE AND MY FUCK YOU FLIP FLOPS, YOU PRETENTIOUS DOUCHEBAG
>>63155684
>How am I supposed to know her Relationship Status? It's not like people post their Relationship Status on their Wall, Mark!
bravo sorkin
>>63155103
>>63155284
You're both wrong. The guy who played Bill Gates was the best actor in that film.
>>63155755
>the reality of Zuckerberg's actions are far more insidious than that of the rich loser in Fincher's film.
can you elaborate?
>>63156728
I'm not him, but Facebook stores basically everything you put on it pretty much forever, I think, and they sell your info to companies and shit. Facebook, by now, pretty much knows everything. Where you're logging in from, what music/film/tv shows you like, where you're eating, what school you go to, where you work, your relationships, etc. etc. And they can also read your private messages. It's pretty much a digital ID card which is scary tbH fäm. There's a lot of ethical issues surrounding Facebook and Zuckerberg is definitely much more sinister and shady than The Social Network makes him out to be. The problem is that the film came out 5 years ago before any of this was public knowledge really. It'd be great to see a sequel to the Social Network with the original cast (and Fincher and Sorkin ofc)
But hey, we have nothing to hide, so why care, am I right guys?
![tumblr_moirhmKY961qdszopo1_500[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/7eNxUvi.gif "tumblr_moirhmKY961qdszopo1_500[1].gif")
>>63157038
>nothing to hide, nothing to fear
>>63155755
[william randolph hearst clapping.gif]
this is doubly poignant because Sorkin ostensibly does the same thing in Steve Jobs.
>>63156961
yeah but he's not a mustache twirling villain, he just wants to wring every possible cent out of his customers, calling"sinister" over questionable privacy issues is a bit of a stretch, I thought he had people killed or something the way they're going on
>>63156961
>It'd be great to see a sequel to the Social Network
I think we need a remake more. Aston Kutcher could play Zack Murkenberg this time.
>>63157304
well, who knows what he wants to do with people's information? he might be forwarding it to the NSA and shit, idk. I'm too lazy to google it. Anyway, I dont trust him or that shady ass site of his.
>>63157320
Remember what his idiot sister said a few years back?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-anonymity-on-the-internet-has-to-go-away/
I wonder what the reaction would be had she said that today, and not in 2011.
>>63156961
>using facebook
Idiots deserve everything they get.
>>63157338
he's an advocate for sharing and is fairly anti-anonymity. In every interview he does he imagines some bizarro utopia where everyone shares everything with each other and there's no drawback to that whatsoever, because your mom would LOVE to know how you talk to your friends or what porn you watch or where you are 24 hours a day, etc.
>>63157388
I don't know how she looks or what's her age, but the idea of fucking Zuckerberg's sisters makes me diamonds.
Hey Mark, sorry if you're reading this, nothing personnel kid
>>63155035
I watched this movie 10 times and I don't even know why
>>63154943
He has potential. However he needs to look for another serious role like the social network, not goofy comedy spiderman.
>>63154943
He shits on eisenberg
Check out his new film with scorsese
>>63154943
>>63155035
Andrew Garfield sucks, the Social Network is highly derivative and overrated as fuck.
>>63154943
MARK
>>63156728
This is an exchange that actually happened way back when facebook was essentially run out of his dorm room:
>Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
>Zuck: Just ask.
>Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
>[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
>Zuck: People just submitted it.
>Zuck: I don't know why.
>Zuck: They "trust me"
>Zuck: Dumb fucks.
http://www.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5
Fincher\Sorkin should have made the movie about that Mark Zuckerberg instead
>>63155785
I liked it a lot Michael Shannon is a beast and Garfield held his own, very well
