[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
What do you guys think of this?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 46
Thread images: 12
File: greatest works.png (4 MB, 2268x1556) Image search: [Google]
greatest works.png
4 MB, 2268x1556
What do you guys think of this?
>>
9gag tier idiocy for people with no genuine interest in art who however want to seem as if they do.
>>
99% of those films are actually flicks
>>
>>63131100
>>
Why is television never included? The best stuff there are leagues beyond video games, comics and most anime.
>>
>memehood
>citizen meme
>pulp memes
step up nigga
>>
>>63131100
>>63131253
I honeslty hate this whole site, the original was a fine troll picture and yet people had to take the joke either too far by adding more obvious shitor by putting nothing but serious choices.
>>
File: 41296.png (2 MB, 1559x684) Image search: [Google]
41296.png
2 MB, 1559x684
>>63131100
>video games
>art
>>63131253
how is venus of willendorf a great artisitc achievement in any regard other than the fact that it's really old
>>
>>63132195
Agree. I think it should be a bit broader to just capture all forms of motion picture media. Although artistic and celebrated television seems to be a bit more common place in the last twenty years, as TV was considered to have lower prestige than film.

What would be a TV show that can be historically considered as a great historic achievement? Not something like I Love Lucy or Dallas or Gilligan's Island (which are historically important, if not objectively good in some way), but actually brilliant works.

Freaks and Geeks? For capturing the falling youth zeitgeist of the seventies in 1980?

Breaking Bad? A bit early to consider this as a masterpiece of human artistry.

Really? What is there?
>>
File: 1280px-Vatican_Altar_2.jpg (303 KB, 1280x697) Image search: [Google]
1280px-Vatican_Altar_2.jpg
303 KB, 1280x697
>>63132397
how are japanese prints great artistic achievements in any regards other than the fact they aren't white.
>>
>>63133183
>how are japanese prints great artistic achievements
How are Japanese prints intrinsically unimpressive? Because they can be reproduced? So can films and books.
>>
>>63131100
A 15-year-old
>that music section
>>
>>63133218
are you actually implying on a technical level they are even comparable to the works of Bellini or
Rembrandt?
>>
>>63133299
Technical masturbation isn't at all a criteria for how I determined the pieces there. I don't care how much time they spent on the piece.
>>
File: 1446251718624.jpg (305 KB, 1920x1290) Image search: [Google]
1446251718624.jpg
305 KB, 1920x1290
>>63133362
ok so you don't care about skill and dedication. i guess shitting on a side walk and putting some velvet rope around it is comparable to actual art.
>>
>no Divine Comedy
kill yourself
>>
>>63133413
>ok so you don't care about skill and dedication. i guess shitting on a side walk and putting some velvet rope around it is comparable to actual art.
Um no. How about the aesthetic quality of the art?

> i guess shitting on a side walk and putting some velvet rope around it is comparable to actual art
And I guess Heaven's Gate is one of the greatest films ever because how long it took and how much money was spent? Oh look I can make retarded generalizations and misinterpretations about other people's opinions too.
>>
>>63132384
Okey, stay mad kiddo
>>
File: mind_blown.gif (2 MB, 200x200) Image search: [Google]
mind_blown.gif
2 MB, 200x200
ART IS SUBJECTIVE?
>>
>grrm is on the list
>tolkien is not

All credibility is lost
>>
>>63133536
>Um no. How about the aesthetic quality of the art?

because something with hideous proportions and lacking detail is aesthetic?

please.
>>
>>63133739
>because something with hideous proportions and lacking detail is aesthetic?
You realize you just described Venus of Willendorf?
>>
>>63133792
where did i say the venus of wilendorf is aesthetic? you assume my objection had anything to do with the wilendorf to begin with.
>>
>>63133874
>you assume my objection had anything to do with the wilendorf to begin with.
probably because you responded to a post about the Venus of Willendorf you sperg?
>>
>>63133992
regarding japanese prints you mongoloid.
>>
who the fuck made those list for video games and anime

>k-on
>kill la kill
>full metal alchemist
>steins gate

>minecraft
>final fantasy
>gone homo
>>
>>63134058
Because obviously you're butthurt that I insulted the Venus of Willendorf.

Now tell me, Wikipedia art historian, which Japanese print is garbage and have horrendous proportions? The one that set a standard for landscape painting for hundreds of years or the one that influenced impressionist painters half way across the globe?
>>
>>63134118
K-On!! is the most well produced anime series of the last 10 years.
>>
File: 1448757691967-edit.png (4 MB, 2268x1556) Image search: [Google]
1448757691967-edit.png
4 MB, 2268x1556
hey man i've fixed your image
hopefully next time you make it(again haha) you'll understand
>>
>>63134118
>he fell for the bait

Let's see if you fall for this one >>63134163 as well
>>
I like how both of the latest Kanye albums made the chart lol.
>>
>>63134198
pitchfork loves kanye so /mu/ does as well
>>
>>63134193
See below

>>63134189
This is bait

>>63134163
This is not bait
>>
>>63134157
i don't personally give a shit about the venus of wilendorf. i found your choice of the "fine art" inconsistent with your opinion of the venus of wilendorf.


>The one that set a standard for landscape painting for hundreds of years

which standard?
>>
File: 1448760244332-edit.png (2 MB, 1559x684) Image search: [Google]
1448760244332-edit.png
2 MB, 1559x684
>>63132397
fixed this one too
>>
>>63134402
sorry david wasn't supposed to be crossed out
it was supposed to go on kirchner
>>
>>63134189
>removed some legit good films
>only left the worst flicks

Sick bait.
>>
>>63131100
>gone home
every time.
>>
>>63134270
Course it is bait, nobody would seriously claim that a low budget, moemoe pandering anime like K-on is the most ''well produced'' series of the last 10 years.
>>
>>63134189
>comics
>not art

retard confirmed.
>>
>realism is the best kind of art
where'd you buy your fedora?
>>
>>63131100
Pleb as fuck, especially msuic
>>
>>63134655
https://twolongfourtwitlonger.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/the-worst-anime-ever-made/
>>
>>63133116
I can't tell if you're being ironic.
>>
File: image.jpg (55 KB, 680x470) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
55 KB, 680x470
>>63131100

I feel kinda bad that I can immediately spot the bait pictures for film and anime, but not books.
I need to read more...
Thread replies: 46
Thread images: 12

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.