[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Are Max Landis and Josh Trank talentless hacks? I'm starting
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 1
File: Chronicle-01.jpg (147 KB, 810x1200) Image search: [Google]
Chronicle-01.jpg
147 KB, 810x1200
Are Max Landis and Josh Trank talentless hacks? I'm starting to think this movie was a successful because of its simplistic premise.
>>
>>63113091
Max is a faggot who only made it because of his father.

He has no talent, and his last two bombs shows it.

He'll get his.

Just think about the way more talented writers that are out there right now, but can't break in because of nepotism.
>>
Landis is a shit writer. dude nepotism
>>
Chronicle was basically him ripping off Akira.

Every time he's had to do his own writing, he's been utter shit.
>>
>>63113190
>>63113126
But they're both the result of nepotism.
>>
>>63113221
No shit sherlock that's what we said.
>>
>>63113091
The stars fucking aligned for this movie, everything just went right and there was very little pressure or expectation.
>>
It was literally a rip off of an X-Files episode

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_%28The_X-Files%29
>>
Saw Victor Frankenstein today. I can answer a few questions.
>>
>>63113091
Personally the jury is still out on trank. It's hard to tell what F4 would have been like if he had got his way.
>>
>>63113293

Probably even shittier than it was
>>
>>63113264
Oh shit, I didn't realize it was written by Landis.

Was planning on going, but fuck that hack.
>>
>>63113232
You only named Landis not Trank
>>
>>63113091
>we loved your quirky cheap movie based on simple schtick. Here, take 100m and make us new avengers.
F4 fail really isn't Tranks fault.
>>
>>63113519

Why do we expect actors to have range but not directors?
Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.