So I'm watching Mulholland Drive
Is the acting terrible on purpose?
Because if not, just tell me and I'll stop watching this shit
You aren't too smart are you?
>>63037561
It's a legitimate question tbf
>>63037534
>Is the acting terrible on purpose?
No. David Lynch is a hack.
>>63037534
Yes it is, you'll notice the acting becomes more natural as the movie progresses
>>63037674
See
>>63038283
It's on purpose, as evident by its drastic shift in tone later on. Anyone who tells you otherwise is an idiot
Say what you will about this shit movie, but the way the performances get dramatically better over the course of the film, is a nice touch.
>>63038527
Why do you think it's shit? I thought it was a really compelling watch
>>63037534
come on m80, I hope you're a film noob. Twin peaks, mullholand and blue velvet have shitty daytime tv acting because lynch is in to stuff like "the dark underbelly of regular america" and stuff like that
>>63038527
they don't "get better".
scenes are intentionally different in tone depending on the intent.
just got to THAT scene
sweet jesus muh dick
