[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
What exactly is preventing the non ruined star wars films being
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 26
Thread images: 2
File: StarWarsVHS.jpg (65 KB, 700x398) Image search: [Google]
StarWarsVHS.jpg
65 KB, 700x398
What exactly is preventing the non ruined star wars films being released on Blu ray? I can't believe Disney would just be sitting on that kind of windfall.

Is fat boy still blocking the release somehow?
>>
Because they know its just a bunch of dumb memers that want this solely based on "monkey see monkey do". Every country had a different version
>>
>>63004846
Arguing how much to scalp the price for the box set. $300 Barebones OT release, people willl buy it anyway
>>
fox still have distribution rights until 2020
>>
>>63004996
Then why isn't Fox releasing them?
>>
>Greedo shooting first,
>That Awful CG in the RotJ Band scene >Hayden Christensen in RotJ

The Outrider flying out of Mos Eisley was neat though
>>
>>63005020
They hate entitled millenial shits.
>>
>>63005021
i quite like the cloud city background changes desu looks nice.
>>
>>63004996
the only have a new hope, I believe
>>
>>63005060
You really think it's only millennials that hate the special editions? George, is that you?
>>
>>63004846
It's not like you can just convert them and release them.

The remastering and restoring is quite the time consuming and costly job.
>>
>>63005090
As far as I know, they have distribution of all 6 up to 2020, then just A New Hope
>>
>>63005121
Yeah, also I burned the originals and negatives and pissed on the ashes.
>>
>>63004846

I think Lucas literally destroyed the old masters in updating the films, to prevent their reissue.
>>
>>63005164

The Legacy Restoration is pretty much perfect and being done for them for free.
>>
>>63005164
>The remastering and restoring is quite the time consuming and costly job.

Diseny owns Lucasfilm since 2012, 3 years is more than enough time to do that
>>
>>63005202
It's to do with his divorce, I believe.
The original edits were made by his ex-wife and she got some residuals from them.
>>
>>63004846
They released partly despecialised editions on DVD a while back. They claim to be the original theatrical release but i think they are actually like the original Betamax release (seriously). They are pretty good any way, its what i choose to watch over the blu-rays
>>
>>63004846

3 Things:

1. Fox owns the distribution rights for A New Hope basically forever, the rights for the other 5 movies will go back to Lucasfilm/Disney in 2020.

2. Lucasfilm claimed in a press release that the original negatives of the OT were permanently altered and they are now the same as the 1997 Special Edition, although a lot of people in the industry don't believe this and say it was just a diversion tactic by Lucas to make people shut up about wanting the Original Theatrical Versions released.

3. Most normies simply don't care enough about the original versions to justify the costly remastering and restoring process that's needed to re-release them in HD.
>>
I thought the rumor was that Lucas actually modified the originals so that no one could ever undo his CGI additions.
>>
>>63005202
The masters were really worn and of a bad film stock. They were in terrible condition. Since some parts were basically useless, they ended up saying 'fuck it', and cutting in their changes straight into the master film stocks.

>>63005450
The LD release from the early 90's i believe. Relatively low quality.

>>63005341
Yeah, but is it worth it for them?
>>
>>63004846
Why do you even need Blu Rays? Weren't these things on laserdiscs? Maybe the quality isn't perfect, but it wasn't great either when it was playing in cinemas in the 70/80s. It actually adds to the charm. Like vinyl or something.
>>
File: 911uAMIhbqL._SL1500_[1].jpg (263 KB, 1107x1500) Image search: [Google]
911uAMIhbqL._SL1500_[1].jpg
263 KB, 1107x1500
>>63005450

The versions you're talking about are the 1993 Laserdisc versions of the trilogy which were released on a Bonus DVD. They are the originals but they are in bad quality (VHS tier) and they're Pan&Scanned to a 4:3 aspect ratio which really sucks.
>>
>>63005514
I have them all unruined on VHS, it would just be nice to see them in blu ray. Maybe with some of the deleted scenes put back in.
>>
>>63004846
>Is fat boy still blocking the release somehow?

More like the fuckwads behind those Fantastic Four movies.
>>
>>63004846
old copys were destroyed.
Thread replies: 26
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.