>You will break.
>>62997397
I will break you
>>62997397
I'm fully aware that this was a bad movie, but holy shit it made me cry like a bitch at the end
>>62997457
>this was a bad movie
implying it wasn't visionary, original, and nonconforming to commercial film pacing
>>62997415
That's a big back.
>>62997492
It was not filmed with precision, nor was it edited well. Typical Spielberg trash.
It's hard to root for a protagonist who knows fuck all what is going on around him.
>>62997804
it's unconventional, but some people can appreciate the effect.
You'll break them
Drakkar noir
>>62997832
Mixing around the story doesn't fucking matter for the visual medium of film, it was not filmed with precision and the editing sucked, fails the Pudovkin test and also wasn't even entertaining or coherent. The fact that it's a Kubrick derivation and misses every single one of these marks is just salt in a wound.
>>62997965
For you
>>62997965
>Mixing around the story doesn't fucking matter for the visual medium of film
you're right, the visual medium was excellent
the story was chronological anyway, maybe you need to see it again
