>Since crafting a potently polarising masterpiece with 2011's The Tree Of Life, Malick has become a man on a mission. A mission to stuff a movie so full of coded self-indulgence it seems like a perverse joke that has misplaced its own punchline.
Holy shit this sounds awesome. Who else is hyped?
>>62988123
>Holy shit this sounds awesome.
I don't think that was a positive review, OP
Malick is a genius and literally everything he makes is a work of art that will be cherished by further generations.
>>62988123
>>62988164
if some pleb really got that buttmad about it, it must be good
>>62988164
Why's there the little green symbol next to it, then? Green means go, like go see this great Malick movie.
that's kinda what to the wonder was like too, if this one is even worse it'll at least be funny
>>62988123
I saw that at a film festival. It's a masterpiece. Critics are fucking plebs.
>>62988278
To the Wonder was as good or better than Tree of Life. It just dealt with less cosmic subject matter.
Another glowing review:
>The result is ludicrous self-parody - somewhere between a Calvin Klein aftershave advertisement and a coffee-table book about the modernist mansions of the rich and famous.
it's probably the greatest movie of the decade
It looks like The Great Beauty, only shit.
i love when plebs don't understand a film so they just call it "pretentious"
Reminder that you should only care about this man's reviews, especially when it comes to films like Malick's.
>>62988455
I usually hate his movies but this one sounds good.
>UK and US still has to wait months to see this
why Terry?
>>62988422
>somewhere between a Calvin Klein aftershave advertisement and a coffee-table book about the modernist mansions of the rich and famous.
>>62989871
he knows movies, but unfortunately he's a rank and file leftist and very unworldly, in case his i-gave-up-getting-laid-20-years-ago beard didn't already alert you to that
>>62990088
>thinking the world revolves around sex
Quick, post rare Terrys
>>62990088
thats basically the jewish critic archetype, no surprise really
>>62988123
Seriously. Just that cover alone.