>>62921238
had to look up nambla. am i on a list now guys?

>>62921941
if u cant handle the bants, you're do a party van sooner or later

>>62921238
lel, j00 detected

get out you kabala reading nose vaccuum

>>62921238
Actually the book was full of pederastic shit (I read it), but Mel got grossed out and made it into a movie in which the teacher had no sexual relations with the boy.

>>62922090
Nah, the movie was still uncomfortable as fuck.

>>62922294
Trust me, the book was way worse. It had the teacher and boy swimming together and I think the kid even started touching the teacher's chest, and in the end of the book it's implied when they're both in bed the kid ejaculated.

I didn't really get a sense of creepiness from the movie, but it was a long time since I've seen it.

This is from Wiki:
Gibson has expressed dislike for the book because of its implied sexual contact between McLeod and Chuck: "I read the script first and that's what I liked. The book is just – I'm sorry, but the guy did it. And you know, like, why? I just wanted to say something a lot more positive."

>>62922485
That's supremely weird. Why film an adaptation of this book if he felt that way?

Is this some arcane Catholic apologia?

>>62922533
No clue m8, I also wonder what the point was if he was going to change the whole book. I read that the author got pretty pissed off at him.

He's made some good stuff.

He doesn't look like Marlon Brando tho.

>Critics have noted that the book's criticism of homophobia had been obscured in the film version.

reminder that fag enablers support pedophilia