What does /tv/ think about movie critics? Do you literally believe some people have an innate ability to judge movies better than others?
yes, of course. not all obviously.
not that it matters.
>>62888761
uptight bunch of faggots that think they're superior to others
see: reddit
>>62888761
No, they're just parasites and as cancerous or more than the celeb actor superstars.
Nobody should read or follow any critics, if anything what the masses think of a film to get a very general idea
We make fun of Ebert cause it's edgy thread?
Yes, I value some critics' opinions and insight, especially those that are good writers and have a wide breadth of knowledge. I don't always agree with them, but that's ok.
Ebert was a hack.
critics are competent when it comes to putting words to their feelings about a movie. if you ask some guy on the street what his favorite movie is, and why he likes it, chances are he'll just say something along the lines of "it was great. i liked the acting, and the plot was good" etc. so i value the opinion of a critic more than the random guy, in most cases.
>>62888824
Then what's the point if you aren't going to agree with them? You just want to read some shitty summary of a movie then?
>>62888823
>if anything what the masses think of a film to get a very general idea
THIS is the very definition of plebeian.
>>62888761
what is wrong with that man's face?
>>62888938
it is very interesting to see other takes on movies. i would rather see a review i don't agree with iver a review i agree with. that would be simply a summary.
>>62888761
Look at his face. How could you care what he thinks about movies? Do you think he taps masterful gap with that face & those opinions?
>>62888938
>Then what's the point if you aren't going to agree with them?
wow
POST THE WEBM
>>62888761
innate?
perhaps slightly
but experience counts
>>62888946
Please do enlighten us whats the proper way, without wasting time on shitty movies.
reading reviews before watching a movie is pretty stupid though.
>>62889728
>reading reviews before watching a movie is pretty stupid though.
Agreed. I don't do it. It's for afterwards.
>>62888761
I make my decision whether or not to see a movie based on who's in it, who directed it, and if I like those peoples' previous work. After I see the movie I read a bunch of reviews to get different perspectives, then I start forming my own opinion of the movie. If you don't get anyone's perspective on a topic but your own, whether it be a movie, a book, a social issue, then you're ignorant. It's as simple as that. People who watch a movie, then immediately go on 4chan to spout their initial reaction to the movie and hurl insults as people who disagree with them or try to articulate their reactions are lunatics. Unfortunately, that's just about everybody here.
>>62888938
>Then what's the point if you aren't going to agree with them?
Nigga you are literally posting on /tv/
>>62888761
It's literally paid shill: the professionI'd do it
>>62889881
my friend does it for a blog. he gets dvds and blu-rays in the mail from their "headquarters", and then just gives them to me when he's done becasue he doesn't want them.
>>62889881
And to shitpost in newspapers
>>62888761
Did this ugly cunt have his jaw blown off with a shotgun then reconstructed from a shoulder blade or something?
>>62888824
making fun of ebert is funny dipshit
he was cool though
