Is she an actual retard?
No. She has dedicated her life to pandering to her established fanbase.
>mfw she seemed like a really cool person with a lot of talent 5 short years ago
;_;
>>62789816
shes probably the only celebrity that i still find attractive even though she had nudes leak
i seriously dont know what it is but seeing her in that really fuckin shitty X men film, with all the 70s garb on, turned me on
i like her sorta dopiness look if thats what you want to call it, shes hot to me, sorry
>>62789877
She looked hideous in X-Men though. Face didn't hold the blue well, she looked fat and strange.
>>62789967
I know the blue suit was utter shit
im talking about her without it
>>62789816
Yes. She has said it several times in the past, people just don't believe her. She's not joking.
Is she a human being?
Then, yes, she is mentally disabled.
>>62789977
Well, I agree with you about the nudes. I never used to like her at all, thought she was ugly. But after her nudes came out suddenly I understood her appeal. She should thank Based God.
>>62789816
That's very similar to what harvey weinstein makes her do to his balls before oscar season
>>62790005
This guy gets it
>>62790157
you just KNOW it looks like a fuckin Arbys down there after Weinstein has had his way... i take >>62790108 back, actually
>>62789816
>There are people posting on /tv/ right now that find just lawkus hot
There truly is none of the old guard left, where the fuck did everyone go?
>>62790302
like i said, in Xmen days of future past (very shitty film btw) [the only reason i watched it is because it takes place in my favorite year 1973] she looked really hot in all the 70s gear, im a sucker for that shit
>>62790384
>having a favorite year
are YOU an actual retard?
>>62790411
well, i mean if you were to ask me to pick on, i'd choose 1973
but i dont really think of time like that anymore, so yeah i guess it is kind of silly
>>62790384
So you were actually attracted to the clothing that made her look how she did?
>>62790447
Just messing around, that's fine. I'm partial to time travel movies that go back to the 70's also.
>>62790494
1) attracted to the costume 2) attracted to the chick wearing it
>>62790384
you have a favorite YEAR?
Good christ the autism
>>62790384
>favorite year
>>62790555
like i said, if you were asking me to pick a single year, id pick 73
but again, i dont think of time like that, as single years, more like periods that evolve over decades and such
im not trying to be a wrong generation fag, im just saying. i love my generations everything, im glad to be alive right now
After reading her excuse for having nude photos, I can confirm that she is, in fact, a retard.
It was something like:
>I'm in a long distance relationship and if you don't send a guy nudes he's going to look at porn and that's not okay, so there's only one option. NOT MY FAULT.
>>62790601
>>62790447
>>62790384
>>62790691
its not really that autistic
>>62789877
she has a hot body, and the nudes confirmed that, but her face is the epitome of average.
>>62790733
is it weird that i enjoy that? the averageness?
is it really average? i mean what constitutes as not average or beautiful? i get really confused by other peoples standards of what is good looking, not because its mostly subjective but because id like to think of myself as a utilitarian and i like searching for zeniths
>>62790724
It's kind of weird at the very least
>>62790849
why? i like having favorite things i personally relate to or enjoy
i get where you're coming from, but its not that strange
>>62790807
there's nothing special about her face. she's not hot, she's not cute, there's absolutely no uniqueness. she looks like a girl you'd pass on your work to or from work every day without giving her another glance.
in fact, when it's not a photoshoot and she's not playing the angle game/caked in makeup she actually even looks slightly below average.
>>62790972
Her face is ugly to me, and she has a lot of big moles.
>>62790972
thats what im talking about
what standard are you using to judge her facial features? what isnt hot or cute or unique, like what are we fucking talking about here
i understand that there is a system we all grow up in and in some ways conform to, how we treat people, work, do things
but when it comes to beauty, what is the objective standard?
for example the pic you posted, she doesnt have professional photoshoot makeup on, and you say she looks not special or average, but id totally hit that up, figuratively
im not trying to come off as desperate, like "of course you would you virgin" im just saying, realistically, what is the standard
>>62791040
>>62790972
She.s got the kind of face that's only gonna look good while she's young. Give it 5 or 10 years and she won't be considered pretty. Give her 20 and you've probably got another liza minella on your hands
>>62791057
that's way too much autism and it's way to late for this shit. just look at her forehead in the pic i posted. i could land an an-225 on that thing.
i'm not saying i wouldn't hit it given the chance, but what i'm saying is that i would not go out of my way to pursue her at least not based on her looks. face wise there's nothing special about her compared to dozens of women of similar age that i see everyday.
>>62791211
im not being autistic (ok i could have phrased that last post much better)
>dozens of women of similar age that i see everyday
you wouldnt want to hit any of that? what makes her different from them? why are they average but your choice of actual beauty so much more superior?
i think you're the autistic one, picking something like the size of her forehead as an actual criticism of her looks
thats just as stupid as saying she has weird toes or soemthing
>>62789816
she doesnt have a high school degree so maybe
>>62791273
nigger, i realize that you're autistic, but where did i say i wouldn't hit any of those women given the chance? her huge forehead is just one example of what makes her face no better than average. the lack of well defined features due to a baby fat-like face is another.
>>62789816
>everyone must act super serious 100% of the time!!
>oh wait that's only women
fuck off you assburger retards
>>62791366
you implied because they are average looking, they must not be worth your time, really autistic thing to say and then back it up with "her forhead is weird"
whatever it doesnt really matter, because at the end of the day, shes just another Weinstein fuck toy, kinda ruins it
