How scientifically accurate is this movie?
>>62711528
99% there's air on the moon not enough to breathe but you don't realy need a suit
Based on a true story
>>62711528
76% per cent plus taxes, tip not included
>>62711549
Yeah you do need a suit you fucking moron, the moon doesn't have an atmosphere so when facing the sun your skin would boil.
Pretty accurate, mostly because they don't really focus a lot on the science part. It's just the setting for the movie.
The only thing which gets me is that we're not sure if there's enough He3 on the Moon to start a mining business. It'd be a potential economic boom if there was. But we still would have to go up there and survey it to rule out whether or not there's an abundant supply.
>>62711549
>you don't really need a suit
what the... are you people just trying to get me mad?
also this movie is stupid and in no way a sci-fi
Cloning a human 100% is impossible and the robot designs are not practicall.
How scientifically autistic and boring was this movie?
>>62711714
at least 100%
There is the matter of him not bouncing around because the moon has hardly any gravity. Did he even bounce once?
Watched this years ago while some what tipsy. Thought it was pretty decent. But need a second viewing now to really decide.
There is a moon.
>>62711657
>>62711690
too obvious.
