I love you.
again
I cried at this scene, too
What is this shit you keep spamming
>>62700239
I love you.
>>62700096
What did she mean by this?
say that again
>>62700897
I love you
>>62700096
>The one episode I actually see of this show and it gets memed on /tv/.
Was this episode unusually good or something?
>>62701630
it was the worst he's ever done.
what show and episode is this? She looks qt
>>62701630
it was ok, this interaction in particular is fucking hilarious but it's funnier if you've watched the show from the beginning and understand how he reacts with any woman 6/10 or better.
I knew he was going to insert himself as the male actor but what follows is great.
There much better episodes of this show though, start from season 1 episode 1 anon
>>62701719
Nathan for you season 3 episode 5
Can you...say it again?
>>62701630
This was the best episode yet in terms of conceptual art.
>>62702040
Nah. The movement has been the best episode this season
>Jungle children
>>62702040
Yeah. Not as many side splitting moments, but certainly had interesting artistic merit. I can see it being referenced for some time. This season's been dynamite.
>>62702040
it would've been better if he didn't stage the show and kept let it be an entirely random viewing of the bar, but that would've stopped us from getting any of the really good bits.
>>62702040
>>62702105
>>62702142
I dont watch this show for its artistic value. I watch it to fucking laugh
>>62702142
>really good tits
fixed it for you
>>62702193
It's entirely possible to do both.
>>62702094
While the movement was very good, I just thought the electronics store was slightly better. Everything felt a little more fresh, the movement had some recycled ideas.
>>62702142
But it was exactly what Nathan the character would do. Over-analyse the whole thing and then pretend he understood it, and then fake it for a tiny audience of mainly friends and family of the cast.
If he had managed to get some more arty types on board, maybe the random element could have worked, but he still has to tell them it's for comedy central and they might realise they're being laughed at.
>>62702193
Ebin.
>>62702239
>If he had managed to get some more arty types on board, maybe the random element could have worked, but he still has to tell them it's for comedy central and they might realise they're being laughed at.
I mean like no actors whatsoever, just tell people they're coming in to see a production unaware that the no one in the bar is an actor and that it's actually just a random night there.
>>62700096
You know what I love?
>>62702333
trips?
>>62703355
dubs
>>62702333
>>62703355
>>62703397
>>62703444
Not bad
>>62703495
Thats what she said>>62703444
>>62702333
>>62703444
uh oh
