Honest predictions on Space Cop?
it's gonna be great
Great
Better than the AVGN movie, but not by much. Hopefuly it'll be shorter.
They should try making a real movie.
Average to bad 6/10
Does Rich have diabetes?
2/10 most likely.
They are not good film makers.
>>62668273
Wait it hasn't been released yet? I'm going to guess it'll be mediocre.
>>62668273
Rich will fall down at least once and yell OH MY GOOOOOOD at least twice.
>>62668273
Feeding Frenzy was pretty good for what it was.
I will expect this to also be pretty good for what it is.
>>62668634
>real movie = drama
Nigga please. They enjoy making goofy comedies so they make goofy comedies.
>"There's a lot of exicitment, there's a lot of buzz and it doesn't make a lot of sense to me because I have no interest in intentionally shitty movies. The best bad movies are the ones where the people making it didn't realize they were making a bad movie."
- Jay Bauman, director / star of Space Cop
>>62668273
It will be a pretty funny low budget comedy, just as Feeding Frenzy was. Regardless of its strengths and weaknesses, however, /tv/ will say it's the worst thing ever and create all sorts of pathetic new "epic" memes about the guys being suicidal, going out of business, etc. Despite these "rumors" RLM will continue on as normal and anons will still be here shitposting, accomplishing nothing with their lives.
>>62669829
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owuy1AuourI
It'll be schlocky and fun but not as good as Feeding Frenzy, although production value will be higher
>>62669871
If you don't understand the difference between a small group of friends making a low budget comedy because of their passion for weird comedy and filmmaking, and a large company cynically churning out a product to cash in on a trend, then there is no hope for you.
>>62669924
Why do you think it will be weaker than Feeding Frenzy?
>>62669951
I have a feeling in ma bones
>>62669891
This desu
Everything they do besides Half In The Bag, Best of the worst and Plinket reviews is shit.
>>62670005
>not liking based Grabowskis
>>62669951
>>62669960
i also feel like it will be weaker then feeding frenzy but it will still make money and shit to warrant a space cop 2 the hottdoggening
>>62669924
This desu senpai
The trailer was abominably unfunny and awful looking. I can only assume the full movie will be the same but longer.
Why does almost every single internet personality think we're interested in seeing their "feature film"?
>>62670308
RLM has been making films long before they were Internet personalities. And unlike people like Doug and Linkara, they have a clue as to what they're doing.
>"Lol guys it's a campy homage to the movies we love, like remember RoboCop and how campy and silly it was?"
>"Lol yea guys but wasn't RoboCop actually a well written tightly scripted film with well developed characters that just had some campy elements because of the era in which it was made and in fact managed to USE a lot of those campy elements to hammer home its point about the 80's culture of greed, authoritarianism, corporate privatization and mass media?"
>"Lol you just don't get, you'd probably prefer Adam Sandler movies and Bay Transformers lol!"
>>62670422
>greentexting excuses nobody at RLM has ever made
Nice fantasy world you live in, anon. Do you have dolls that you pretend are Mike and Jay that you act out scenarios with as well?
>>62670422
RLM loves Robocop, and not in an ironic campy way. You sound fucking retarded.
TWELVE YEARS
W
E
L
V
E
Y
E
A
R
S
Brava, Mike! Brava!
>>62670453
>he doesn't have lifesized ultrarealistic wax figures of every RLM member draped around his living room
>>62670422
>dat autism
>>62670374
that linkara movie looks fucking genius
I think that I'll get tired of Rich's stupid Space Cop mumble after about 3 minutes. The whole thing is going to stupid because Rich has never been able to emote convincingly while putting on a different voice.
And I bet if you take a shot everytime he falls down, you'll die of alcohol poisoning.
>>62670614
"Genius" in the same way that Birdemic looks "genius"
>>62670619
Rich is actually pretty good in Gorilla Interrupted. He has more to do in that than he normally does.
>>62670661
>Gorilla Interrupted
the only good movie they've ever made
>>62670619
joke's on you, i was gonna die of alcohol poisoning anyway
>>62669871
This is why Linkara's movie ill be better than Space Cop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyxxsVi3aWU
>>62670681
even with gorilla, the documentary is ten times more watchable and interesting than the actual film itself. it's definitive proof (as if we needed it) that RLM's real strength is talking movies, not making them.
>>62670712
Jesus Christ. I don't follow Channel Awesome threads so this is my first time seeing this. Good God it looks worse than I could have imagined.
>30 fps
>flat even lighting
>poor audio recording
>shitty CGI
>no distortion on images appearing on a computer screen
>awkward, nonsensical shot compositions
Is is truly shocking.
>>62670719
I like the kids-playing-in-the-backyard energy of GI
>>62670719
Prety sure RLM themselves would agree with that.
Hey remember Classic Gilchrist? Apparently he's homeless now:
>http://orangecow.org/emergencyinlosangeles.html
>>62668273
It's gonna be garbage
But they made it ironically so that makes it ok
>>62670757
>this feature with terrible production quality, acting, and writing will be seen by more people than the features I've made
god damn I'm not saying the movies I've worked on were amazing, but at least they look better than this shit
spiritual and financial disaster
>>62670712
The lack of self awareness from most people related to/involved with TGWTG never ceases to shock me.
>>62670901
>Put simply, no one wanted to rent an apartment to a freelance artist. They assumed I wouldn't be able to pay the rent, and their snobbery pushed me into one bad situation after another.
They said I wouldn't be able to pay my rent. I can't pay my rent. Give me money!
>>62668273
It's bad on purpose so it's impervious to criticism. They are geniuses.
>>62671396
>preferring a tenant with a consistent, regular income to one with a wildly sporadic income
>snobbery
Classic.
>>62671396
Classic Gilchrist!
>>62670901
Jesus Christ, the lack of self awareness here is astounding.
>it's everyone else's fault that I'm a fuckup and my life sucks
>>62668634
They're not nearly talented enough.
Did you see Jay's dumb experimental thing? Holy fucking shit.
>>62671859
>comparing a slapped together youtube "series" that was clearly shot in an afternoon that's intended to be a joke to the work that goes into creating a feature film
Nice false equivalency, bro.
>>62671859
Have you seen The Recovered or Feeding Frenzy? They're really well done considering they were both made on a budget of $20.
>>62671859
What is the connection? If you're going to compare Space Cop to anything, compare it to their other feature films, not some dumb youtube video.
>It's suppose to be bad. That's the joke.
>>62671930
>The Recovered
admirable effort at making a sincere film hampered by the (lack of) budget
>Feeding Frenzy
smug misfire of a film with a couple of good performances
>>62672044
Who are you quoting? RLM has never used this excuse, despite how /tv/ keeps spamming it.
>>62671978
he's probably talking about Jay's Lynch-interpreted-by-a-dim-film-student short film "Pork Pork in Space"
>>62672120
But that was clearly a parody of Lynch's style.
>It's not supposed to be good just turn your brain off
>>62672159
>>62672044
>maybe if I greentext things I just made up, it will look like I'm actually making a point.
>isn't this cheap looking costume funny?
>>62672099
>RLM has never used this excuse
RLM fans on this board ALWAYS do. It is their go-to for deflecting criticism.
>>62672149
Case in point.
>>62672303
>RLM fans on this board ALWAYS do.
I have literally never seen this. All I ever see are autists like you that chime in with their "it's bad on purpose" criticism, usually responding to nobody.
>>62672196
Did you miss the part where everything RLM ever has done is ironically bad?
>>62672329
I gave you an example in the post you're responding to.
>>62672345
The Recovered and Feeding Frenzy are their last two feature films. Neither were "ironically bad." It's pretty clear you're only familiar with their web videos. They're smart enough to know you can't do that type of humor for an entire feature.
>>62672426
Because parody is the same thing as "bad on purpose?"
Protip: it's not.
>>62672439
Did you miss the space cop trailer too?
>>62672475
The trailer with the blu laser shooting up into the sky? The trailer itself is clearly a joke. I'll wait for the "real" trailer.
>>62672463
>"Pork Pork in Space is a shitty Lynch rip-off"
>"That's the joke."
>>62672544
No, Pork Pork in Space is a parody of Lynch's style. Again, not the same thing as "bad on purpose." You're manipulating reality in order to complain.
>>62668273
will be worse than avgn
>>62670422
I'm fairly certain one of them referred to RoboCop as a perfect movie when they talked about it.
>>62672592
Feeding Frenzy was better than the AVGN movie and that was made years ago for no money.
>>62669891
>my face when not a SINGLE anti-RLM KEK has ever successfully refuted this post
>>62672329
Here's yet another example for you:
>>62672514
>The trailer with the blu laser shooting up into the sky? The trailer itself is clearly a joke. I'll wait for the "real" traile
>>62672664
>L-look, guys, I posted it again. Am I a meme yet?
>>62672695
Yeah I can't imagine why people would refute your dumb, misplaced criticism with actual examples and reasoning.
Why would anyone release a joke trailer that makes their movie look bad? Isn't that massively counterproductive?
Would you let Mike hide in your house?
He needs to get away from Jessi for a bit.
>>62672785
>dumb, misplaced criticism
What's dumb and misplaced about pointing out that RLM fans deflect all criticism by saying that "RLM did it as an intentional joke"
>>62672935
RLM makes comedy videos. Of course the justification for their comedy is that it's supposed to be a joke. What you've been doing is trying to say the comedy in their features relies on "bad on purpose" which just isn't true.
>>62670901
I gave him 5 bucks. I've laughed at some of the guy's videos, that's worth something
>He failed to realize he would get more donations if he just wrote I'M DYING LAUREN GIVE ME MONEY
>>62672966
>bad on purpose
Do you think this only means the really obvious shit like the bird effects in Birdemic? Because "bad on purpose" could be applied to Jay's character redemption arc in Feeding Frenzy which was an ironic comment on 80's Spielberg rip-off characterization.
>>62673216
>I've laughed at some of the guy's videos
Which ones? Every thing I've seen by him is the most cringeworthy thing imaginable.
>>62673229
>"bad on purpose" now means whatever I want it to mean to justify my pointless bitching
Alright, I'm out. You're a retard.
>>62673304
Sorry that you're too dumb to discuss anything that requires you to make anything more than shallow, glib replies.
>>62673229
You've clearly watched a lot of their content to form such strong summations of their work. Why do you watch them in the first place if you apparently think they suck?
>>62673384
I don't think they suck, but I don't like everything they've made. Why does it have to be all or nothing?
B R A V A
R
A
V
A
>>62673216
can't gilchrist move in with latza for a crossover season? imagine the keks
>>62673281
That one where he sings The Look of Love, I guess. It's cringey but I found it to be somewhat endearing at the same time
>>62668273
Now, I love their review shows and youtube shit and all, but all of their short movies I've seen have been pretty terrible. I don't know if their brand of humor really works with a full feature length movie.
I'm just glad they're done with this highschool project some 20 years later so they can move on to other shit.
Anybody else witness the huge Pre-Rec meltdown last week? Jack went berserk because Rich dared to use the word "retard". There was then mass bannings by the feminazi mods when everyone started making fun of SJWs and Sensitive Jack. Then Rich streamed solo for a good hour until Jack showed up and you could cut the tension with a knife!
>>62668495
It's gonna be great.
>>62669698
No, he has ciatica.
>>62669829
>and yell OH MY GOOOOOOD
I doubt it, that's a Troll 2 reference.
>>62674046
Have you seen any of their previous feature films?
>>62669871
>"Space cop is not an intentionally shitty movie."
-George Lucas, director of Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace
It's gonna be NERF OR NUFFIN!
Feeding Frenzy was pretty good and I expect Space Cop being better than FF it'll most likely be good
Why would you expect this?
>>62674051
I remember an incredibly cringey and awkward moment between Jay and Jack for about 5 minutes. Made me want to barf.
>>62670631
Birdemic had some semblance of coherence and cinematography going on.
This
>>62674183
was obviously meant to reply to this
>>62674159
>>62670565
He already acknowledged that.
>>62670712
That fat faggot clearly has no idea what he's doing. Why do these freaks have an audience at all? And I don't mean an audience like Chris Chan has an audience. I mean an unironic audience.
>>62670712
>>62670712
Linkara's movie had a higher budget than Blue Ruin
>>62674051
>Jack and Rich have a grown up discussion about language that ends with them agreeing to disagree on a word's social acceptability
>meltdown
Only on /tv/. Why do you idiots thrive on e-drama so much?
>>62674051
>pre-rec fags always trying to twist RLM threads back to their pathetic stream thing.
>>62671412
>It's bad on purpose
That's just "bad".
>>62674295
>grown up discussion
aidsmoby treats someone older than him as if he were a child and gets justly ignored.
>>62672345
What I find hilarious is that this type of post always comes from some channel awesome fan. As if they have any room to talk.
>>62674438
Channel Awesome is SINCERLY bad which is 10X more entertaining than smug hipsterism
>muh lighting
>>62674290
how much did atop the fourth wall cost?
>>62672877
They know the 300 copies they'll sell will be to established fans who are probably clever enough to figure it out. I don't think they have any delusions of breaking into the business anymore.
>>62674431
To be fair, he's treating Rich Evans like he's a child, which for all intents and purposes, he is.
>>62674145
As a Nerf guy, shit that is lazy
>>62672935
>What's dumb and misplaced about pointing out that RLM fans deflect all criticism by saying that "RLM did it as an intentional joke"
Pointing the criticism at the fans, instead of the people in question. That's pretty much the definition of misplaced.
>>62673216
>he would get more donations if he just wrote I'M DYING LAUREN GIVE ME MONEY
Shit, I doubt more than 20 people would get that joke.
>>62674500
Are those your children's toys?
>>62673881
His parents would ground him for sure.
>>62674513
Not in the context we were speaking in.
>>62674051
Yeah, I never felt strongly about Jack one way or the other, but that hissy fit was pretty retarded.
>>62674500
>As a Nerf guy
>>62674548
No my kids are too young for Nerf guns
It will be the death of Rich Evans' blossoming acting career. Forcing him to either fade into obscurity or start doing nude scenes.
Screencap this.
>>62674107
Does the great space jam count? Because I struggled to finish the fucking thing.
>>62674224
you mean he pandered to a /tv/ meme for the tenth time, yeah
>>62674600
I wanna fuck tha big titty girl
>>62674550
garrett's or paul's?
>>62674640
>/tv/ meme
RLM invented that meme
>>62674468
But then the fanbase is not sincere, because they watch them ironically.
>>62674581
>Implying internet superstar Rich Evans will ever struggle to find work in showbusiness.
anon, pls.
>>62674581
this t.bh
>>62674659
Paul's, of course. I doubt Garrett's parents even acknowledge his existence.
>>62674688
this is the problem with RLM's features - they're not good enough to be sincerely entertaining and they're too self-aware of their shortcomings to be enjoyable ironically. You just sit there and go "oh, that was clever" "ha ha i get it"
Anybody heard how this will be sold?
Physical media?
Digital d/l?
Both?
>>62674600
>does a short film shot in less than 12 hours count as a feature film?
Listen to yourself, man.
>>62674808
Patreon subscribers only
>>62674788
>RLM's features
agh i made a sweeping generalization. this refers only to Feeding Frenzy and what I've seen of Space Cop
>>62674825
kek
it'd be pretty cool if they picked it apart and poked fun at it in a review video. doubt they'll do it though
>>62674808
Blu Ray and digital I believe
>>62674776
>I doubt Garrett's parents even acknowledge his existence
>>62674917
That's what their commentary tracks are for. Despite how autistic /tv/ gets with the "ironically bad" criticisms, their commentary tracks on their own movies show that they are very well aware of their strengths and weaknesses. They do their best with what they have but can look at the final results objectively.
>>62674960
Kek. I wonder if Gilchrist has seen RLM's Patreon and begged them to take him back.
The jokes we are going to see:
+Kurlan naiskos sound effect
+Back pain
+"OMG" Rich
+Shock humour
+Underplaying for comic effect (almost never successful in their work but they constantly do it)
>>62675092
>Underplaying for comic effect
What does this mean? Examples?
>>62675144
Quick example: When Jack gets gutted in Feeding Frenzy.
>>62675198
What? He doesn't get gutted in Feeding Frenzy.
>RLM
I love how Mike just puts Aidsmoby there as a big fuck you to the audience for not accepting him.
>>62674995
>very well aware of their strengths and weaknesses
YES WE KNOW.
>>62675230
He meant Mike's second character with the bandaged face
>>62675296
Bane?
>>62675092
>+Kurlan naiskos sound effect
I googled that but it just came up with some ceramic statue thing. What did it sound like?
>>62675395
It was a joke sound effect in the Star Trek Generations Plinkett review. The joke was brought back a couple times in some of their other videos.
>>62675321
>>62675522
Is that characters name Jack, or did dipshit up there really think that was aidsmoby?
>>62675395
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOVkixm5MZA
>>62675577
sorry it was literally years since i watch this
>>62668273
Can't wait to see it to be quite honest family.
>>62675697
Me too. I hope there's a rip out soon.
Tbh kek
>>62675092
this family
RLM are the living embodiment of the smug, detached Gen-X ethos.
I'd venture to guess none of them has felt a single sincere conviction about anything since childhood. They exist as polyps upon the colon of culture, satiating themselves on the perceived failures of others (i.e. "The Man") while adding nothing new to the discourse aside from ironic complaint.
They're a group of insecure, lost, rapidly aging burnouts who silently believe they could do a better job of making films than the professionals in the industry. Yet they lack the ambition and ability to actually enter the very industry they're obsessed with. They choose instead to fuck around and make student film piss-takes well into middle age.
They are awful, awful people. I've met thousands just like them, and the last thing we need is for these people to gain any attention for their navel gazing.
Please, /tv/, do not aspire to become anything like these people. Theirs is a lonely road leading to depression and a life devoid of real purpose.
I hope they disappear and their disaffected followers stop subsidizing their lifestyle. Perhaps that would force them to do something productive with themselves.
bump for justice
>>62675577
Jack is based. It's 2015 and he still has to deal with regressive man-children like Rich. More power to ya, my (e)friend.
It will be enjoyable, /tv/ will relentlessly shit on it anyway
they're self aware and seem to enjoy what they do.
Don't you wish your job could also be your hobby?
That would be a lot better than the shitty office I go to on a daily basis.
>>62678633
>enjoyable
If your standards are low enough, sure.
>>62678691
So we're supposed to enjoy Space Cop because we should want to live vicariously thru RLM? That's pathetic.
>>62678691
RLM are the living embodiment of the smug, detached Gen-X ethos.
I'd venture to guess none of them has felt a single sincere conviction about anything since childhood. They exist as polyps upon the colon of culture, satiating themselves on the perceived failures of others (i.e. "The Man") while adding nothing new to the discourse aside from ironic complaint.
They're a group of insecure, lost, rapidly aging burnouts who silently believe they could do a better job of making films than the professionals in the industry. Yet they lack the ambition and ability to actually enter the very industry they're obsessed with. They choose instead to fuck around and make student film piss-takes well into middle age.
They are awful, awful people. I've met thousands just like them, and the last thing we need is for these people to gain any attention for their navel gazing.
Please, /tv/, do not aspire to become anything like these people. Theirs is a lonely road leading to depression and a life devoid of real purpose.
I hope they disappear and their disaffected followers stop subsidizing their lifestyle. Perhaps that would force them to do something productive with themselves.
I like the wierd king of akward they to
>>62678888
Nobody is trying to say that you have to like Space Cop. What kind of fucked up insecurity are you living in?
>>62678584
fuck off jack. nobody likes you.
>>62679162
The topic of the thread is that you MUST like Space Cop? I don't see that anywhere in OP's post.
>>62679275
I deleted my previous post before I saw your response because it was an underwritten response.
Where did I say that anyone is being forced to like Space Cop?
