>Earlier today, the US House of Representatives passed a 2,000-page omnibus budget bill that contains the entirety of the controversial Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act. Just moments ago, the Senate passed it too. Now the bill is on its way to President Barack Obama's desk, where he has the option to veto it... except he almost certainly won't. The gargantuan document lays out a $1.15 trillion spending plan that has received solid (if not unanimous) support from both sides of the aisle and should prevent a government shutdown like the one we saw in 2013. But at what cost?
>Update: As expected, President Obama has just signed the bill, enacting both the $1.1 trillion budget and CISA.
>In a nutshell, CISA was meant to allow companies to share information on cyber attacks — including data from private citizens — with other companies and the Department of Homeland Security. Once DHS had all the pertinent details, they could be passed along to the FBI and NSA for further investigation and, potentially, legal action. The thing is, critics saw the bill as way for government agencies to more easily keep tabs on Americans without their knowledge. CISA was derided by privacy advocates and tech titans alike, with companies like Amazon, Apple, Dropbox, Google, Facebook and Symantec (to name just a few) issued statements against an earlier version of the bill.
>>63822595
>By sticking CISA into such a huge omnibus bill, there's basically no way it won't become law. And if anything, the version of CISA that was quietly slipped into this budget plays with privacy even faster and looser than the original. For one, a previously held prohibition against sharing information with the NSA has been removed, meaning America's best surveillance agency can receive pertinent data without it being handled by Homeland Security first. More importantly, the provision that required personal information to be scrubbed from cybersecurity reports also seems to have gone missing, leaving that task up to the discretion of which ever agency gets their hands on it. While the federal government has been trying to toughen its stance on cybersecurity in the wake of massive hacks on the Office of Personnel Management and Sony, we wound up with an even more effete version of a questionable plan that will soon become law.
>>63822595
sum it up faggot.
tl;dr
>>63822649
>>63822652
You have less freedom than you thought.
This isn't star wars
fuck off
>>63822698
This affect Canada? I assume so.
>>63822698
Big whoop
>>63822698
So nothing new, then.
>>63822721
Here is an example of people who made darwin doubt human evolution.
>>63822595
>implying the government cares about my watching anime
also
>still torrenting non-anime in 2015
>spending 1.1 trillion to protect media corporations
nice
>>63822698
Ayy, I don't live in America.
That peeple website is shady as fuck.
>>63822595
>>63822608
Welp, time for me to buy a few externals and download ALL the movies and tv shows real quick.
Who cares, just get netflix
>>63822595
>more government spending
DOG BLESS AMERIGA :DDDD
>>63822595
How can a country already trillions of dollars in debt think that this is a good idea?
>be american
>get debt
>>63822816
The $1.1 trillion is the entire budget of the government, not this thing. It was just bundled into it.
>>63822595
>americuck
>>63823080
what else can they do? if they stop spending the country will colapse
Remember to pay denbs
>>63822759
actually not at all you rambling schizo cancer, darwin never heard "big whoop" and had that comment influence anything ever, you really really need to kill yourself you are an insanely sick pig
>>63823177
give up.
the gubmint should give up, and loads of people will die, and then only the best will survive.
everything back to good in 2 years
Gotta gibbe de monis to the military industrial complex
>>63822595
>>63822608
I thought NSA already did this?
Or is this a new kind of evil where they suck all your information from different services and then just pour it back analyzed by the gubmint?
Or is this just legalization for what they have been doing for the last 15 -20 years?
>>63823282
The what's that now?
>>63823221
But would you not rather live anon?
If you want to die why not just kill yourself today?
SOPA rising?
>tfw comfy in australia with my private trackers
>>63823520
I'm saying the gubmint should give up.
Or we can force it to.
>>63822698
>stealing movies
>freedom
lmao you piratefags never learn.
>>63823556
Private trackers makes it easier to find you once they take those sites down. You're safer on public torrent sites where a flood of normies downloading the latest GoT can drown out your single indiscretion.
>>63823581
>inb4 someone accuses you of not understanding internet piracy
You are literally stealing from the companies because they lose money they otherwise would have made through DVD and Blu Ray sales.
>>63823603
>Private trackers makes it easier to find you once they take those sites down. You're safer on public torrent sites where a flood of normies downloading the latest GoT can drown out your single indiscretion.
This would be true if they were in anyway tied to my identity but your point might be valid for some
>>63822595
This is what happens when the majority party (Republicans) get bitched out for standing for anything. If shutting down the government was a viable threat they could have opposed it, but they are totally kucked so they let Obama do what he wants.
>>63822608
Reminder that the constitution of the Confederacy said
>Bills shall pertain to but one subject, and that should be expressed in the title
These omnibus bills should not be allowed. We need an amendment like this.
>>63823702
The republicans would've opposed it? Really? Probably half of them get monies from their own security&entertainment companies from this.
Something like this requires shitload of infrastructure and trillion lines of coding. Somebody will make a lot of money.
>2015
>he still torrents
>>63822595
[ ] a free country where the citizens have rights and the government is nothing but public servants to the will of the people
[ ] a country ran by liberals
Pick one
If you voted democrat then you voted for this. Enjoy the Orwellian nightmare.
PIRATEKEKS BTFO
>>63823904
Cuck
>>63823879
Have a (You)
>America
>freedom
choose one, americucks
when does it go into effect?
>>63823927
cuck
>>63823791
There would have been enough opposition that it wouldn't have passed.
>>63822595
No such thing as a free lunch, buddy. Stop being leeching off other people's hard work.
>pirate fags btfo
>>63823955
I think it already has
they're just making it official, Snowden confirmed this was happening three years ago. Now, the gubmint can sue you for stealing legally and also have four years' or more of data as evidence.
>>63822698
>>63823879
>>63823947
Perfect example of the delusional poorfag piratecucks. They're so stupid, they actually think getting arrested for stealing (breaking the law) is a violation of "muh freedums"
Fucking retards.
This is fantastic news for people who aren't poor and respect the medium. No more redditors spewing their retarded opinions after illegally downloading shitty rips online.
>>63823702
What are you even on about?
Republicans are the ones who pushed for the original bill.
REDDIT BTFO
E
D
D
I
T
>>63824058
It's not illegal in my country. Eat shit, burger.
>>63822595
Eh, that's what you get when you unilaterally let Republicans control Congress. Don't cry now, we deserve this.
I hope things get worse. It's the only way to make you idiots take elections outside of the President seriously.
>>63824080
you're way out of luck boyo, this has never been about individuals, they like the rest of our law go after distributors.
If you know someone that is doing that, then you might be fucked but last time government tried to sue individuals was back when Napster was still popular.
>>63824028
>the gubmint can sue you for stealing legally
I hope you know how retarded you look for writing that.
Idgaf still gonna pirate shit from ruttacker Tbh
>>63824135
Good thing it doesn't apply to your shitty country then, foreign scum.
This is the first step to saving film. I just hope Anita can take it to another level by eliminating sexist tropes completely from movies so we can all get one step closer to more enjoyable film experiences.
>It's a film with the smurfette principle
LITERALLY into the bin it goes
>>63823638
>my email, IP and detailed statistics won't identify me
k
>>63824232
Good. I can feel your anger.
>>63824135
Your country must be 3rd world, congrats.
>>63824058
Fun fact: sharing was 100% legal up until the entertainment cartel decided to make it illegal with the DMCA. So a perfectly legal act was made criminal by an act of legislation by politicians with pockets full of cash.
There are even some within that cartel that believe used CD's, DVD/blurays, and games should be illegal due to it not profiting them.
That's why they're now manipulating the masses into preferring digital content; you can't share it, you can't sell it, trade it, or anything. You don't own it. You own a license to use it.
>>63823581
it's coming to a head where pirates has to now engage in actual piracy tactics like terror and murder to keep the ones with the means to wreck their shit on the low. at the moment it's rather tedious to go after some one and wreck their shit so it's better to do so electronically. hereby myself and others has to now learn how to hack to wage a war of terror on those who would asunder our piracy.
>>63824257
>what is a VPN
anon pls
>>63824205
yes, because they couldn't prove it legally before
>mfw my """"""""""artist"""""""""" friend say piracy is stealing
>mfw noone would know him and he would be flipping burgers for a living without piracy
>mfw non american (aka actually free)
>>63824369
>What is browser id?
>>63824345
I'd start with English lessons before tackling hacking famille.
>>63824380
>browser id
/tv/ pls stop you're embarrassing yourself
What you're referring to is called a user agent and fingerprint.
>all these buttmad yuropoors, chinks, gooks, japs and spics
You're no more free than Americans. Once you've got a Bill of Rights as extensive as the American version, you have a say in this matter. Until then, stay silent and stay subservient - if Americans are watched, you should expect to be watched even more intensely, because your shitty governments have few, if any, legal hindrances to passing draconian surveillance laws.
t. yuropoor
>>63824135
>It's not illegal in my COUNTRY.
And what country would that be? I'm pretty sure that downloading torrents is illegal in the EU, too.
fuck, can they track me from my previous pirating? I haven't downloaded anything in like a month but you guys got me scurred.
>>63824375
>mfw non american (aka actually FREE)
Don't kid yourself. You most likely do not have a right to keep and bear arms, or free speech, or free press, or a 4th amendment equivalent in your country.
The Bill of Rights shits on your socialist pisshole (forgive me if my assumption was wrong, but the most persistent america-bashers are usually nordic welfare state cu cks).
>>63824335
And if you ban the licence model for software, you're going to take a huge amount of innovation and incentives out of the systems.
>be amerifat
>elect tyrannical government
>>63824617
>implying their government is any more "tyrannic" than yours
I bet you get thrown in jail for "hate speech" and need a "license" to own firearms (i.e. you're deemed a serf by your rulers). Poor pleb.
>>63824662
go get shot fatass
>>63822595
GOD DAMN she looked hot in the thumbnail.
>>63824711
>implying I'm American
>implying white americans need to fear "getting shot"
You need to tell your black and spic friends to stop shooting eachother in gang feuds.
>>63824724
This desu senpai
I bet she was a knockout 10 or 15 years ago
>>63824552
theres no head of state governing the entirety of europe like it is in USA m8..
>>63824335
>You own a license to use it.
Technically (at least with games) you always did. But in practice they were just like any other kind of product. With digital content with DRM you remove a lot of value from the thing you're buying. In 10 years there will be a lot of people who bought PS3 games digitally who simply can't download them anymore.
USA are the new sovjet union, the new global menace to personal liberty and freedom
>>63824871
>theres no head of state governing the entirety of europe like it is in USA m8..
I never implied that, but merely that it's illegal to torrent in European countries too.
>>63824871
I'm pretty sure it still is illegal to ban torrents in the EU though
>>63824918
>USA are the new sovjet union, the new global menace to personal liberty and freedom
And yet they're the only one's with a Bill of Rights that strongly protects personal liberty and freedom. Funny, isn't it?
What does this mean? And what does /g/ say about this?
>>63824919
It depends on the country. In comparison to the US, not many countries sue people who download torrents. Germany is really the exception here, although other countries are slowly following suit. Don't be mistaken, the US has some very tough laws against piracy compared to other countries.
>>63824957
Your bill of rights means jack and shit son, it's just a piece of paper that became toilet paper the moment the Patriot Act was passed
The USA are a jewish oligarchy that is ran in the exact same manner the sovjets ran the USSR, secret police, secret courts, 1 million people (!) working in the total surveillance industry
Whoopdefuckingdoo, your surveillance industry is privatized and outsourced instead of government-owned, that's basically the ONLY difference between Stalin and Obongo.
>>63824345
>those who would asunder our piracy
I'm dying help
>>63824957
>And yet they're the only one's with a Bill of Rights that strongly protects personal liberty and freedom
Not really
>one's
ones.
>>63822595
Haha, cvcks
>>63823603
But i only decided to buy the thing after i torrented it, if i hadent torrented it i would never have given it a second look.
>>63825108
cuck
>>63825120
English obviously isn't your first language so don't pretend that you have enough cash to leave the favela and actually pay for media, you underage third worlder.
>>63824909
> All dem steam games I never had time to play :(
>>63824957
It's funny they have a bill of rights since they are such a repessive country.
>govt faggots always complain when someone reveals they've been hiding important shit that everyone really needs to know ASAP
>oh but we'll fuck you up if you hide anything from us
>>63824724
You fuckin blind? No amount of compression can make that look good.
>>63825222
You mean repressed or oppressed. Not repressive, that doesn't make sense in this context.
What country are you from by the way?
>>63822595
>>>>>>/pol/
Also, nothing to hide, only pedos give two fucks about their personal information held by the gov.
The funny thing is.... no gov has the ability to process that bulk of information. They will have data on everything about everyone. So? They couldnt do shit with the phone records. What do you thing they are gonna do now that they know you bought ten dragon dildos from amazon or that you post you fury photos on FB and have fake accounts to give yourself more likes?
>>63825167
At least he speaks more than one language.
>>63825141
Testing
KEK
>tfw you aren't an American
>>63825328
You call that speaking English? Nah, he's not at all a polyglot.
>>63822595
a glib facsimile
>>63825328
>it wont happen to me lel
nice argument retard
>>63825374
Lmao nice try cuck
>>63824957
>can't pirate movies anymore
>get stripped naked and anally violated by border control
>get shot by your own police on a daily basis
M-MUH CONSTITUTION
MUH BILL OF RIGHTS
>>63822595
"Omnibus" sounds really spooky
ameridumbs
>>63825420
Test
cucк
>>63824609
>ban
you mean withdraw legal support for? You can't 'ban' something that only exists because of a legal construct.
>>63825328
>muh nothing illegal, nothing to hide, no guilty argument
how new are you?
>>63822595
>1.3 trillion
China better revv up them loans
>>63825483
Smdh tbqh cuck
>>63825464
You must be dumb as fuck.
>>63825528
It's just a dumb shitskin pretending it can think, don't pay it any mind.
>>63823770
>we need to be more like the confederacy
i been saying it for years, mate
>>63825270
Different Anon, but repression makes sense to me.
One way to use repression as a word, is to describe measures to maintain/enforce the status quo via peaceful measures.
Oppression would imply a more hands-on approach. Although I believe it's subjective, since the difference between Oppression and Repression can get as ambiguous as what is/isn't a dictatorship. Sometimes it's a matter of how you look at it.
>>63825551
sмн твн faм
>>63823803
literally what other option exists?
>>63823770
stupid technicality that would be overcome by make the subject of a bill pertain the the subject of many bills. any law can be perverted if the elected officials are shitty
>>63825270
One where they speak english and realize repressive makes perfect sense in this context
>>63825661
Nice essay, shame it's completely irrelevant and that you need to learn to read.
A country being repressive is not the same as it being repressed or oppressive, both of which are actually grammatically correct. Words have different meanings in their different forms. You're the type of person who doesn't understand the difference between addictive and addicting.
>read entire bill
>nothing that could even so much as be twisted to apply to piracy
... uh... yea...
>americucks
Feels good to be in an non retarded country
>>63822595
>1.1 trillion
MONEY WELL SPENT
>>63823803
>>63822794
Are these people such douchbags that do not understand that if you stream,someone has to download the file from a torrent and upload it?
>>63825796
>an non retarded country
Your post and existence just refuted your own claim familia
>>63824257
>my email, IP and detailed statistics won't identify me
Of course those things won't identify me.
I use private trackers
I use a throwaway email to register
I have a dynamic IP
I live in a third world country
Me and my 10+ TB of stuff are safe, feels good.
>>63825571
>implying it isn't
>>63825803
>torrents are the only way people get files
Hello and welcome to the internet
>>63822595
>Your goverment actually cares about internet piracy
Too bad not everyone lives in jew-occupied countries
Guys.. i'm sure that now after everyone will stop pirating shit, we will see a rise in content quality..r-right?
>>63826063
>Torrent is not the only way to download something without any reliance to private servers
Hello reddit
>>63826165
What do you think trackers are?
I like how this is being discussed more on /tv/ than /pol/. Which tells you how retarded the average /pol/tard is.
TRUMP WAS AGAINST THIS BUDGET
TRUMP 2016
piracy shit aside
what else can this thing do? it sounds pretty serious like you cant do or say anything over an internet connection or you are fucked
>>63824745
lol go get shot and eat a burger
>With respect to privacy, the bill includes provisions for preventing the act of sharing data known to be both personally identifiable and irrelevant to cyber security. Any personal information which does not get removed during the sharing procedure can be used in a variety of ways. These shared cyber threat indicators can be used to prosecute cyber crimes, but may also be used as evidence for crimes involving physical force.
FUUUUUUUCK
>>63824593
You are not the only country who offers rights to its citizens you fucking imbecilic cunt. But yeah, Swedcucks are atrociously fucking annoying. They are the worst country in the EU regarding civil rights, by far.
>>63823185
>you really really need to kill yourself you are an insanely sick pig
>being this mad
>proving my point
can someone tell me what exactly is changing with this bill that could directly affect me?
>>63826406
you are correct.
Glad I'm not American.
Reminder to always download the torrents put up by randoms that only have like 10 seeders as It's the least likely to have feds watching It
>>63823603
>downloading game of thrones
Do people actually download gigabytes worth of HD episodes every season? I usually just stream it and save the hassle.
In the short term, there will be no effect upon the average citizen.
Say, if your phone conversations had been recorded for the past ten years and you didn't know. Did that affect you over that ten years?
Remember, "average citizen". That's barring getting arrested based on that evidence or whatever for current crimes.
However, people's problem with such invasions of privacy shouldn't be whether you'd be embarrassed about your porn fetishes or the fact that you do whatever else you'd simply rather not people know about. It's not even about being caught in the act of something currently illegal.
The whole intent of the bill of rights to begin with was to help stave of tyranny and to protect people should that sort of thing happen.
Something like this is data that could potentially be used as a "list" A government having a list of people who were Jewish, would make it very easy for someone to target people for incarceration, abuse, or violence, for a well known example.
It's not about how the government may abuse such data tomorrow, but next year, in 5 years, a decade, or several decades. What could be done with such data? Say, our government is more or less "good" for a few decades but then some really bad people get into power, your grandkids go off the grid so as to not reveal that they're Jewish(just to use the same example). However, birth records tie them to you, and ALL of your interests are cataloged and archived.
>>63826900
This is the part of what the US founding fathers had considered when it comes to human rights, so they set up structures to help avoid having something like this put into place. Should you encounter an agent on the street, he would have no way of knowing who/what you are aside from what he could see with his own eyes.
Forget the jewish issue. What if radicals came into power that had some sort of hatred against gays, certain political or or other spiritual beliefs or other lifestyle choices. Say, if fast food became a legal requirement, but you're caught looking up recipes. What if working on your own car or computer became illegal? These last two examples are a bit more likely than people think within the next few years.
It is a historical fact that laws change over time, and that, indeed, governments don't necessarily need laws to have some form of persecution. Knowing this is the case we should at least have some laws about how they obtain information on individuals so that we have something to which we can hold them accountable...
That's poor phrasing, but the idea and TL;DR is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...
Essentially, there are warning signs. The more measures we have in place to prevent X from happening, the sooner it can be caught and rectified. To stave off the loss of those rights, we need to try and fight constant erosion of those rights before we hit a point where it is too late to do anything about it at all.
That is why people are so upset over this being put into law now. A major battle was lost.
>>63822595
RIP YIFY
10/10 video
10/10 audio
0/10 news
Goodbye forever ;_;7
>>63826827
Pleb
>elect people to serve you
>they spy on you
Yanks everyone
I thought we stopped SOPA?
>>63827206
fml
reading through the highlights now.
found this:
>The crimes that may be prosecuted with such information are restricted to offenses relating to fraud and identity theft, espionage, censorship, trade secrets, or an imminent threat of death, serious bodily harm, or serious economic harm, including a terrorist act or use of a weapon of mass destruction.
>>63827206
JUST
>>63822595
>the US House of Representatives passed a 2,000-page
False alarm people nothing is happening back to your post
>>63827199
Don't feel bad anon, we spy on you too.
>>63827286
So what I get from this, just watching pirated movies (which arguably is not "serious economic harm" since you're not the one sharing it, and you're not supporting who ever does it) is fine, but sending someone death threats from across the globe is bad.
Also
>Censorship
What exactly is this? How can they track someone censoring someone else? I'm probably just too tired to think of a good example, but can someone explain how a civilian can be charged with unlawful censorship?
>>63827370
I know that, yankland is the cancer ruining the entire world
>>63827429
>The Department of State must develop a diplomacy strategy to obtain agreements on international behavior in cyberspace and consult with countries regarding the prosecution and prevention of cyber or intellectual property crimes.
i just found this as well
>>638274295
Shredding proof of a crime you dindu
>>63827429
>censorship
If they suspect arabs are paying you to write pro-radical and remove trump articles, they'll arrest you. Anything with information manipulation/control really.
>>63827514
>>63827535
Wouldn't these be covered by fraud/terrorist acts though?
I mean yeah, you're probably right. It just feels like since they listed it separately, that it should imply a different kind of felony.
Thanks for the examples though.
>>63822710
any internet traffic that passes through an american computer
just read this off a summarization:
>And the government claims that information it receives will not be used to prosecute non-cyber related crimes.
if that means anything to people worrying about other shit
>>63827730
>be cyborg
>read this
shit
>>63826237
Its telling you how retarded /tv/ is. This is a cybercrime bill. Piracy is still a civil matter unless its done on a large scale for profit.
>>63827730
they say that, but that's not true, they will use the intel to prosecute anyone they want, they might not submit it in court but they will use it for investigation
>>63822888
this. must suck to be a blob.
>>63827785
>law specifically states it evidence gathered this way can't be used to prosecute
>THEY STILL GONNA USE IT 2 PROSECUTE BRO
... you do know how law works, right?
Good. Fuck you, pirate fucks!
>>63826969
There will always be another.
Someone will pick up the slack, and investigations take too long to keep up with them.
>>63827868
windows 10 and cisa.. deadly combo
>>63824137
>obama didn't veto it
Did you miss this part? Keep towing that party line bruv. It's not like the dems didn't play an active role in nafta, tpp and now this.
>>63827987
true but republicans are worse because they openly support this stuff while dems pretend to be against it
>>63828031
>dems are better because they are sneaky hypocrites
b8
>>63826593
>hours later, a tedip reply
lol sorry man but that guy btfo of you
So basically I can still pirate movies with 1 Kbps upload speed and delete the torrents immediately after the download finishes. Ok cool
>>63827987
>Didn't veto it
Now, I don't want to say Obama is the best president, or a good one, or anything of the sort.
But you have to understand how this shit works:
>Obama vetos something
>Senate has to reasses it
>Senate is free to pass it to the White House again as long as it's in a different package, because Obama can only veto packages
>Since Senate keeps packaging it with the budget, it means Obama either has to eventually sign it, or the entire fucking economy of the US of A goes belly up
>If that happens, it's all Obama's fault, because why didn't he just sign a harmless package
It's the senate fucking you in the ass.
I know it feels big and thick, so you assume it has to be Obama's. But it's actually a hundred skinny old man dicks bundled together.
To put this into perspective:
You know those 1.1 Trillion dollars that were in the same bill? If he doesn't sign the bill, nothing happens with that 1.1 Trillion dollars, because what it would be used for is not approved.
How hard do you think it would hit the American economy and general public services if all of a sudden 1.1 Trillion government dollars just stopped in their tracks and didn't get spent on what they're needed for?
>not using mIRC
I'm not American.
Why should I care?
>>63828628
because you're already being spied on without a warrant
>Obama extends patriot act
>Obama signs this
>Libs don't care
>the same retards who kicked and screamed when Bush signed the patriot act
>>63828803
they only share the name
>>63823581
>making copies of digital information on your own computer
>stealing
>>63828878
>take (another person's property) without permission or legal right
>not stealing
>>63828973
>data stored on your own privately owned device
>another person's property
topcuck
Daily reminder that copyright law is a complete joke designed to screw over the consumer and line the pockets of corporations that have nothing to do with the creation of content and that the whole concept of the internet is predicated on sharing information freely.
>>63829162
>a movie, video game, song, or tv show made by someone else
>your property
>>63829215
;^)
>>63829215
>Get book from library or movie from video store
>Borrow a book or movie from a friend
>No intention of purchasing it either way
How is pirating any different from this you stupid cuck?
>>63828738
>tfw nothing to hide
let them spy. i'm not doing anything illegal lmao
>>63822595
>wanting china. russia and isis to be able to attack your infrastructure
>>63829215
>a recording created by you
>not your property
>>63829279
But didn't you know Anon?
You are the hacker known as 4-Chan.
You are the most illegalest there is.
>>63829375
>>63829259
When libraries purchase a videocassette or a DVD, or make a video file accessible to patrons for a specific rental period, they own the physical object but not the copyright. Copyright law, therefore, determines what libraries can and cannot do with the videotapes/DVDs/video files they own without infringing upon the copyright they do not own. However, the law also includes exceptions and limitations to the exclusive rights of the rights holder that allow libraries to lend, preserve and replace videos and allow non-profit educational institutions the right to publicly perform videos in the face-to-face classroom, and under certain conditions, in the distance educational classroom via digital networks. When libraries want to use a videotape/DVD/video file in such a way that would infringe upon the copyright, permission must be sought from rights holder in the form of a license agreement.
>>63829259
>they stopped filtering cuck
._.
They also spent a ton of money trying to destroy rentals, and only first sale doctrine (something they've also been trying to destroy) saved rentals. First sale doctrine also protects lending/borrowing.
Piracy doesn't have any legal protections.
>>63829259
yeah, but that is equivalent to watching the movie with your friend.
When you copy a movie or song, It's like printing out a new book by scanning the old one, and then distributing it.
>>63829375
>what are copyright laws
>>63829380
not the response i was looking for. go fuck yourself, idiot
>>63826969
i really wish they would've given us a sex scene, she was so fucking hot in this movie
>>63829442
>>>/reddit/
>>63829259
By law, you can do whatever you want with something you bought... except make copies of it and distribute them.
>I'm ok with less freedom if it means more protection from a near non-existent threat.
>>63829479
reaction image are the original cancer :3
>>63822698
>WAAAAH WAAAAAH I CAN'T BE A THIEF MUH FREEDUMS
>>63822816
Are you fucking retarded?
The 1.1 trillion wasn't for this one bill alone lmao
>>63829524
Fuck off, Lowtax
>you will never live in a small irrelevant yet comfy european country where no one spies on you
just fucking die in my sleep already
>>63822595
>jews want to monitor control and manipulate the flow of information
truly shocking
>>63823282
There's literally nothing wrong with the military industrial complex
It helps us big dick and cuck the rest of the world
>>63829499
>I'm ok with less freedom if a liberal is in office
>>63827206
damn I forgot this dude existed, I used to read his shit all the time 10 years ago
>>63829626
>No one protested when Republicans did it.
>pass all these shitty bills that nobody but our corporate campaign donors like, or we will shut down the government
Is this incorrect? It seems like our government can strong arm anything it wants into law.
>>63824335
Fun Fact: Driving drunk used to be legal as well
>>63824345
It is still theft. You are robbing an entire industry when you rip movies
>>63829736
were you even alive when Bush was in office?
>>63829764
I'm actually older than you.
>>63829775
Different Anon, but how do you know you're older than him?
What if this is some random grandfather who came over to his kids' house for Christmas, and everyone's on their fucking iPhones, so he came upstairs, saw that his grandson's PC was on and wanted to check out what the kids these days are up to?
Granted unlikely, but seriously, "I'm older than you" is a childish argument, even when it's a fact.
>>63829438
Copyright laws prevent individuals from making a profit from an author's content without their permission, friend.
Glad I could help out one of society's "special" people
>>63825445
>can't pirate movies anymore
Good, you don't have the right to be a fucking thief
>get stripped naked and anally violated by border control
Good, spics and drug smugglers need to be stopped
>get shot by your own police on a daily basis
Good, I'm not a dumb nigger who tries to take cops guns/commit violent crimes
I support all of these actions
>>63829764
I doubt there are any 0-7 year olds here.
>>63829775
If you're older than him and think people didn't protest Bush's policies, then you're just an idiot.
>>63826237
/pol/ is an excellent board where this issue has been discussed thoroughly for weeks
>redditor makes retarded nonsequitir
>gets BTFO
>>63829864
>it's perfectly legal for me to freely distribute someone's work if I'm not making money off of it
but that's wrong
>>63829746
Step 1. Download game illegally
Step 2. Install game
Step 3. Uninstall game
Repeat until company is bankrupt!!!
>>63829602
>By cucking ourselves first
Do you know how shitty life is for an average american now compared to the 70s?
>>63824058
this is really boring bait, fyi f@m
>>63829718
his youtube vids are pretty funny
>>63829941
>implying anyone is as stupid as you
It's not legal, but it's not stealing.
Literally by definition
>>63829937
>/pol/ is an excellent board
>>63825688
>sмн твн faм
I concur with the hitler dubs.
Nothing will change. People are incompetent and indifferent. All symbolic
>>63829960
I don't. Please explain with comparative examples.
>>63829960
>le wrong generation
>>>/reddit/
>>63829991
inb4 "Stealing is whatever the government says it is!!!"
>>63829941
I steal someone's car he aint got no car
I pirate a movie on the internet the person who shared it and the company who made it still have it.
So how did I steal it? Just because they lost POTENTIAL money in the process does not mean I stole anything.
>implying torrenting was ever legal
>>63829991
>take (another person's property) without permission or legal right
>>63829946
The first time you install it without paying you are taking money away from thousands of people.
What you do after that is irrelevant.
I hope the government passes more laws to stop piracy.
>>63830070
It's just information, faм. You can't own an idea, man.
>Implying I'm going to stop
>>63830070
>take
>implying they no longer possess it
>>63830070
Whose property though? If I bought a house and let a friend crash there for free would the company who built the house have any legal right to claim that friend is a thief?
So if a company makes a movie and you buy and share it with a friend for free why does that company feel like they are entitled to prosecute that friend? Just because it is hollywood they get a free pass right?
>>63830147
Enjoy prison, sмн
>>63830182
Sure thing m8
Use a VPN, you fucking morons.
