How does /tv/ feel about films that sort of blur the lines between pornography and cinema? Do you think it's valid or gimmicky?
>>63645113
degenerate jewish crap masquerading as art
>>63645113
>films that sort of blur the lines between pornography and cinema
They did it in the 70s, from the "pornography" side, and it's failed miserably. All the modern shit like Nymphomaniac or Noe films, or Baise Moi is just too timid, too neurotic to embrace the essence of porno.
I mean, if Trier wouldn't been a faggot, that interracial threesome scene with Gainsburg would've lasted 10 minutes instead of 40 seconds. But he's not interested in the fucking, or in the human body, or in the nature of sexual pleasure, he's just going for the shock value - the "shocking" image of a penis penetrating a vagina, for fuck's sake.
>>63645162
Back to the designated Star Wars containment sandbox, you gigantic manchild.
>>63645113
DUDE AUTEUR LMAO
Seriously though, no, it's gimmicky as shit and Von Trier is a hack.
I don't care as long as the film is good
Nymphomaniac and Love aren't good
>>63646574
This, Lars von Trier is god awful
Anyone have any thoughts on actual porn as film?
Like Cafe Flesh and Pretty Peaches?
>>63645113
based shia giving zero fucks on that poster
>>63645113
no one does it right, it just feels gimmicky.
>>63646796
I plan on doing one.
I remember Fellini being asked if he'd ever direct porn and him saying he probably wouldn't because he never heard anyone saying "I've seen a beatutiful porn movie".
>>63645113
This blurs nothing, this was garbage, and I love von Trier
I have yet to find a decent movie using porno.
It can probably lead to something valid, but turns out all the recent examples are garbage.
This film is way too deep for the underage b&s at /tv/
>>63645113
If you're masturbating = bad art
If you're not masturbating = good art
this is why the best movies about sex are about people who are entirely unhappy while having it
>>63645113
I can only think of one film that does it right.
>>63645482
In the Realm of the Senses did it well m9
I'd say it was gimmicky but I really enjoyed Nymphomaniac on the first viewing, less so on the second
>>63645113
Degenerate try-hard garbage intentionally trying to cash in on human biological drives.
has anyone watched caligula? they've tried this shit but audience reception makes it not work well
>>63647014
THIS POSTER FUCKING MOVES
>>63647014
Fassbender really is in a lot of movies where he plays someone who fucks everything up and loses everything because of it.
>>63645113
maybe if I was 15 years old, that's just obnoxiously distracting now
also, that poster if fucking gross
>>63647014
there wasn't even that much sex in it. The trio with the asians at the end maybe but I don't remember it being very visual.
Great movie though. Better than that Von Trier Tripe
>>63646796
I really enjoy that era of pornography when most features were all shot on 35mm film, the standard of quality was much higher back in those days.
>>63645113
It was an absolute stroke of genius casting LaBeouf.
>>63647111
back to pol young autist
