its Pattinson according to me
So who the fuck is this?
His going to be alright isn't he /tv/?
>the movie will not make much profit
pic related is only the beginning
How can Hollywood compete with this?
What are some movies that feature nuclear explosions?
The thing is ...
So at the end she turns into a flying feminist?
what a dumb movie. screaming for one and a half hours and not much else 2bh. why was it supposed to be a big deal?
But the Patriarchy was right.
The witches steal babies and kill them for rituals, and they also abduct and corrupt children.
Persecuting and killing them was perfectly reasonable.
The main problem the father of the family had, is that he was an arrogant idiot that made the rest of the community to exile him in a witch infested shithole.
Otherwise he did nothing wrong.
Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?
Because if you don't you're a friendless loser instrument of the patriarchy. Even the original Ghostbusters said this film is better, none of them were threatened or bribed even. So go see it or you hate women.
Because it features the funniest women in today's Hollywood.
>Caleb, what are you lookin at teehee xD
What did she mean by this?
What is your favorite Kurosawa film?
if someone gave her some soup and let her sleep through the night, what would have happened?
This actually is a really good question. Arya was more pudgey than her before her pregnancy, but she had the baby messing around with all her organ placement. I'm no medical professional, would that help or make it worse? I'd they be more likely to hit the baby than any of her vitals. Like, she was unconscious fast as fuck and Arya just jumps in the SHIT INFESTED water and walks out like she just stubbed a toe.
How did this show get canceled? So much fucking better than Arrow.
>Matt Ryan out-acts 90% of Arrow's cast COMBINED
>Seems to not be edited by a retard
>Dialogue isn't horribly written and completely useless
>Genuinely conveys a sense of horror, is overall a good adaption of its source material
>Actual humor not made in demographics lab
Yet somehow, it went to ABC, a channel only interested...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I thought it was pretty good too bro...normies eh.
They put it on at 10 after Grimm but for some reason the faggots that watch Grimm fell asleep after watching 60 min of 90's era face-morphing faggotry.
>this random nameless orc is more memorable than anything in the hobbit trilogy
why are these movies so good and why is the hobbit trilogy so shit
Any news on an extended cut?
Considering so many are stating how bad this movie's pacing is - I will decide to perhaps not see this movie until an extended cut is released.
It won't help. Nobody in the movie (except maybe Ben Foster who doesn't show it though) can act. The only thing that's going to change is that maybe they'll provide more background for the butchered story.
It won't change the fact that all the humans are goody-two-shoes and so is Durotan with his FEL IS DEATH, FEL IS BAD