Remind me why everyone liked that pile of shit.
just a general suggestion, you might get more and better discussion when the premise of your thread doesn't make potential respondents feel like they're being invited to argue against some immature doofus with a thoroughly entrenched opinion
He was a CONSOLE of ROME!
What the fuck was his agent thinking?
why hasn't there been a film about Ronnie illegally supplying guns to a mercenary guerrilla army and smuggling coke to facilitate it?
Is this the most underrated movie of the year?
Why is Part II so ridiculous compared to the other two? Everyone seems to be grossly overacting it's not funny.
Part II and III were filmed back to back, and after Part II got lukewarm reviews and underperformed at the BO, some hasty reshoots and editing were done on Part III to improve its quality.
Speilberg weighed in on III and the result was a stronger film. Zemeckis is a very uneven director.
What is in the briefcase?
A communications disruption could mean only one thing...
I made a movie and it got 63 % on rottentomatoes out of 20 reviews. Have I failed or success? No I wont tell you which cause youre gonna flood it with negatives and destroy my career. not that I blame you, I would do the same
Is it your first? If so, then okay job??? Honestly though, rt only matters for some films. Mostly for blockbusters and mainstream movies. If you have an artsy fartsy movie, reviews from fucking critics don't matter as much.
Is Brooklyn 99 okay
Black Jives Madder
HE DID IT THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN!
hey guys Max here I know you guys don't mean it when you bring up the twilight indecent (or when you talk crap about anything I'm involved in for that matter). You are just trying to get a reaction out of my and it's ok you all are just trying to have fun I get it. I know if we met in real life we would talk about movies and get along fine, maybe we would be friends, who knows. Anyways guys just wanted to say thanks to red letter media for having me.
JUST a thread about Trey Parker
prove me wrong