ITT: Useless fucking characters
Pretty much /tv/ the animated female character.
>>68173771
Characters who are literally you then?
Best Sci-Fi film? Pic related(duh)
If your pick is 80s, explain rather than be a try hard edgy fag. 2001 is garbage only enjoyed by those afraid of having their intelligence questioned.
/thread
NA
Best trek coming threw.
>You have ten seconds to come up with a legitimate reason that is of sound logic for Tony Stark not giving each of the non-superhuman Avengers Iron Man suits.
You know what would be more infinitely useful than Iron Man and Hawkeye? Two Iron Men.
Inb4 he's a narcissist. Why wouldn't he want to protect his friends his delicate plebeian friends?
Inb4 only he is smart enough to use it. Rhodey got along just fine, and he's black.
>>68173487
Because that would be visually boring.
>>68173487
You know what would be more infinitely useful than two Iron Men? Iron Man and an Iron Man with aimbot-like skills.
Yeah I agree completely OP. If they wanted to beat any big bad they just need to equip every Avenger with custom Stark tech and also built an army of iron man drones (controlled by Jarvis this time, kek). Problems solved.
>>68173487
Because capitalism.
Daily reminder!
>>68173472
>my opinion is superior to everyone elses
>L-look guize, reddit iz our rival! Everything I hate is reddit!
>I'm so edgy and patrician, so far beyond you fedora tippers! I'm a true contrarian.
Kill yourself, faggot.
I ought to peel off your flesh and eat you alive.
>>68173520
so mad
>>68173567
I'll find you. You think I'm joking. But I will.
>time travel movie
>they can travel back to a time before the machine existed
>>68173410
>time travel movie
>they can travel back in time
>time travel movie
>they dont arrive in deep space
>its a time travel movie where they change a horrible event for the good and no diplomacy has changed
When will /tv/ admit this?
>>68173395
Any questions ?
>>68173395
When /tv/ realizes that LOTR is only considered great because it came first, both the movies and the books. It's a simple story with simple characters with simple motivations told well in both cases, but it's not much beyond that.
>>68173451
To add, warcraft isn't great. It is to fantasy what star wars is to sci fi- a ridiculous amalgamation of stolen plot elements designed to be fun above all else. I have hopes for the movie purely because of the director.
thoughts?
What-a mistake-a to make-a
>>68173185
Muh dick.
>>68173185
I grew up with the series as a kids i loved it. Renee was such a master. Theres literally nothing i dont love about this show looking back. I bet i would probably not be able to watch it now but back then it was the best seeing him running around trying to bang three hot girls he literally didnt care about anything else. No man can win a war quicker than one who wants to get laid lol
Are there any movies or series about an evil corporation, but from the perspective of the boss?
Maybe a rise to the top, a conflict between rival companies, involvement in political corruption, etc.
Basically House of Cards but with money instead of power.
What comes to mind?
>>68173991
Wouldn't the ones about a villian's rise to power qualify?
I guess that's what you're looking for. I can't think of anything that's not a single TV episode though.
Maybe Breaking Bad counts?
There's a Bernie Murdoch show
if you want rivaley between companies then Suits seems fit thats , but if you want perspective of the boss then there is BOSS but i don't think there is anything else
KRAMER
I'M ON THE ROOF
So were any of the actors non jewish?
HEY EVERYONE
WELL JUMP
Actors who have never acted in a good film.
>>68172898
Wasn't he in Stand by Me?
Forever was the best Batman.
JJ Abrams is my favorite /tv/ meme
Honestly, is he a good director or not? I remember him being praised as the new Speilberg.
He is the king of 6/10
He couldn't do a creative thing even if you put a gun to his head
Well atleast he never makes plain bad movies
This >>68172897 but less harshly; hasn't made anything outright awful, but nothing truly amazing (Star Trek is probably his best imo, and that's got an absolute shit tonne of source/ideas to borrow and use anyway)
>>68172853
He's pretty good, I give his movies 6/10 portion.
Better Call Saul - Episode 209 "Nailed" Discussion Thread
>how far will Kim go with Jimmy now that she's turned to the dark side with him?
>will Mike try to put a bullet into Hector after hearing about the good samaritan?
>How the hell do those two film nerds know a girl?
>will Jimmy be the one who calls 911 in his fake voice?
>is Chuck going to die from this incident?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
rip spaceman
>>68172913
He's not dead yet
>>68172790
>how far will Kim go with Jimmy now that she's turned to the dark side with him?
Not far since we she wasnt in BB. I bet she gets an offer for partner at HHM and takes it with the catch that she has to bring back the bank
>will Mike try to put a bullet into Hector after hearing about the good samaritan?
Probably more because they threatened his family. I assume Mike is the guy who cripples him and thats why hes in the wheel chair...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
ON THE ROOF!
oh so that's what he says
>>68172874
No, he says "underoos"
>>68172874
he says: it's a ruse
What do you guys think of Chris Stuckmann?
I think he's right on the money 90% of the time.
In that case I must have only seen the other 10% of his videos because he is utter shit.
I wish he'd STUCK something up my ass
if you know what i mean ;)
chris please go
he can be pretty autistic (not in the funny charismatic Jeremy Jahns way) at times but I like his videos nonetheless.
Who /speedwatching/ here?
I watch everything at 2.5x speed with subtitles generally. Honestly, the sound isn't that important and you can generally hear everything.
Does anyone know of a filter or something to lower the pitch, it gets fucked up at 2.5x. and subtitles slow me down.
That's the patrician way of watching. Good job anon.
>>68172678
Sorry. I'm not a meme man.
>actually watching movie
>not reading the plot on wikipedia