> *grunts and speaks unintelligibly*
Does Hollywood only casts Tom Hardy in roles where he has to grunt a lot and speak unintelligibly because that what's what the role calls for, or that's simply how he does every character he is cast in?
Or is he simply the guy that grunts and speaks unintelligibly? Like how Tom Cruise is the guy that runs away like a retard and Russell Crowe is the guy with an attitude?
I'm sorry, was there something you did not understand? Is your universal translator perhaps malfunctioning, op? I can try to speak more slowly and simply for your benefit if you feel that would help.
What did he say?
So this whole big plane ordeal was for Dr. Puvelheer to say that he said nothing? Couldnt Masketta Man find out what he said by interrogating him?
>Stephen Merchant To Star With Hugh Jackman In ‘Wolverine 3’
>The Office co-creator Stephen Merchant has joined the cast of 20th Century Fox’s Wolverine 3, the latest in the Hugh Jackman-starring X-Men stand-alone franchise. Jackman has said this will be his last go-round as the character he began playing 17 years ago.
Turns out...little monkey fella'.
can we all agree this is the best film made post 1999?
Why did they do this? It's Marvel's biggest misstep besides the fact every Thor movie is terrible
>It's a nothing but feels Louis episode
Holy fuck did he say that? Haven't watched the ep yet because im a high functioning alcohol and the people around me make me feel bad enough about it, but i saw the thread the other day and i know what lucozade is.
>it's a Steve gets cucked episode
Just watched this. Did I like it?
>just experienced this
results in: you hated it
>90s style cinematography
>Some of the worst acting of any big movie in the last decade
>One of the least original screenplays in history
>Chimp nigger is one of the most uninspiring characters I've ever seen
>90s style CGI
>80s B-movie tier score, one of the worst I've had the dissatisfaction of listening to
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I think this is the only reasonable explanation for how poor the movie was. I can understand kids enjoying this piece of shit for a bit of cheap fun. It's a movie made for young children.
That explains a whole lot. There should at least be a warning to adults going in that you're not going to find anything other than bottom of the barrel, bang your head against the wall cinema though.
Why does this look so bad? It looks like a screensaver from 1998.
Who are the best new media film critics?
i enjoy RLM for entertainment, AngryJoe for passion and Stuckmann for his short and sweet reviews
that being said, reviewing stuff as a profession is retarded, i just enjoy watching people talk about stuff i enjoy, i don't let their opinions weigh in on whether or not i will watch something
Why do people here get so butthurt about Doug?
Is this good?
Has anyone seen this yet? Is it any good?
Is there ANYTHING this guy cant do...?!?