What's /tv/'s opinion on this movie?
>Tom Cruise rips his catheter out and pisses all over the floor in Born on the 4th of July
>viewers are shocked and sympathize with the traumatized character
>Army Dog pisses all over the floor in Army Dog
>viewers laugh and don't realize its a drama
The plebs just didn't get it.
Have you ever had a problem with your family over movie likes and preferences?
Buy a ticket to the Warcraft movie.
No other board to post this in and I'm pretty certain it will be a movie soon.
People are shitting their pants trying to get into this show. $1500 dollars for a pair of tickets for a Friday night showing.
What's so fucking great about this play? Anyone on /tv/ seen it?
>tfw we'll never get an X-Men movie where the action is on the same level as the airport scene in Civil War.
Everyone in Apocalypse just stands there and waits for their turn to fight it's so boring.
>yfw the Russo's did this in Civil War
BETA UPRISING NOW!!
Is TV in a better state than movies right now?
Not the greatest actress in the world but does the films she wants to do and is not a Hollywood whore but people still hate her.
how much are tickets at your theater?
I've seen this movie twice now.
What WAS in the box?
Why is it that Hollywood always releases two of the same movie a year
2 volcano movies
2 asteroid movies
2 mall cop movies
2 dueling magician movies
2 talking pig movies
2 CGI bug movies
2 white house takeover movies
2 snow white movies
2 Truman Capote movies
Now two civil war movies
This was better than it had any right to be.
I expected a "muh troops" military wankfest but what i got was a very personal story about 6 soldiers trying to protect people and survive the night. Based Bay.
i thought it was alright. the denouement was super great, but the action was filmed too much like a spectacle. the characters didn't feel distinct enough - when two of them died at the end i wasn't actually sure which two it was until they showed the other four together.
my favorite scene was when the Delta guys were throwing Glen's body off the roof, and Jack freaked out at them - very real and intense moment.
>look up Harry Potter limited edition steelbooks
>half blood prince $190.00
>deathly hallows part 1 $399.99
>deathly hallows part 2 $199.99
>the others I got for 35-40 bucks
Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.