What was his motivation?
What was his plan?
He was actually the Joker in disguise.
I have no idea. It seems like he was butthurt about Superman. Then he decided the best thing to do is create a human/kryptonian hybrid who looks like a troll stolen from Lord of the Rings. After Superman is dead, he seems kind of happy that the world will now be visited by all powerful beings who could destroy earth. I think he might just have been insane
wow that was unbearably mediocre
wow literally not any of those things wow
wow good acting =/= good movie wow ive seen these characters in so many other movies before wow nothing new wow holy shit bro wow hysteria lmao wow strict repressive parents breeds messed up children wow DUDE WOW EPIC LMAO
not even in haneke's top 5
>"In our research, a lot of people go to one movie a month and would love to go to one more if it was a better deal," Lowe said. "Some people don't need unlimited [access]."
>For more adventurous cinephiles, there are new subscriptions for seeing three movies a month. And, of course, MoviePass will still offer fully unlimited plans. The company is also dropping the 24-hour limit that previously made it difficult to take full advantage of its unlimited plans (if you saw a film at 10pm last night,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Computer, load up celery man please
So, is this why DCucks were screaming "paid shills" whenever a Marvel movie got a good review?
Because DC (owned by Warner Bros.) was paying reviewers to say nice things about their dog shit movies, they assumed Marvel must be bribing reviewers too?
What was that one controversial from Raimi's Spiderman? Can't remember it and it's making me crazy.
>he never went to italy
that episode is comfy, where tony and the gang hang out in italy
Does a better bank heist film exist?
What does it say when Richard Roeper is one of the last bastions of classic film criticism?
Why are plebs pretending to care about film criticism now?
For years you iqlets called Brody and White pretentious and anyone that agreed with them hipsters. Has your taste film improved now or are you still the tasteless drones you were when you cried hipster and that fun should be allowed since film is supposed to be """entertainment"""
or is this another excuse to shitpost and stay away from developing better taste again?
Why is Paul Verhoeven so maligned?
He made some really, really great movies that still hold up.
It's not his fault the plebs didn't understand Showgirls at the time of its release.
He's quite unAmerican (or even anti-American) and his Dutch films aged like milk while his American movies are sort of a mixed bag.
I don't think he's particularly maligned though. Just not that acclaimed since his movies aren't that conventionally arty while still offending a lot of people.
I can only guess, but I think he actually quite dislikes many of his American fans because he feels they like his movies for the wrong reasons.
Great guy, though.
I love the way he exploits and manipulates his lead actresses
Guy knows how to make movies
If Mike died overnight, would you still watch RLM?
>Josh becomes new Mike
Yeah. It would be less funny, but Josh picks on Rich almost as much as Mike. He's more boring tho. Jay and Rich have almost no chemistry, tho, they work best as Mike-Rich, Mike-Jay, or Mike-Jay-Rich
Friendly reminder to Marvel fags that this is the kind of movie that gets good ratings in Rotten Tomatoes
>He drinks a regular Coca Cola while watching a movie
Name me something better than a Coke Zero while enjoying a movie at the cinema.
Alright Gonzalez family,
NAME SOMETHING A MAN IS LIKELY TO DO WHEN HIS WIFE ISN'T HOME