>artist claims they are willing to draw just about anything and everything
>will not draw: scat,watersports,farting,slob,loli,diapers,rape
Because those are sub-nigger tier fetishes, lad
>artist won't draw characters in Trump hats
>>3237980
gee /pol/ was btfo again?
that's it time to delet pol.
>Artist wants comments and praise
>No creepy comments
>>3237894
I see nothing wrong in this
>>3238365
That shit pisses me off, not because of rp'ing or other stupid shit people in comments do but because YOU DRAW FURRY PORN, what kind of comments do you expect?
I had to unwatch and artist that complained about that and went so far as to start blocking peoples comments or allowing no comments on pieces.
>>3238028
>Everyone who has a different opinion than mine is /pol/
Faggot
>>3237926
t h i s desu senpai
all of those (except rape) are shit-tier fetishes that just about everyone hates
rape is for edgy teenagers still confused about their sexuality
>>3241201
So thats why /h/ likes it so much
>>3237926
this
>>3239350
Who?
>>3241113
>Everyone with a different opinion than mine is an sjw tumblrina
Next time try to make a point that isnt stupid.
>>3242875
Didn't even suggest that.
Idiot.
Build a wall.
>will not draw scat
fine
>will not draw watersports
shame but I can live with that
>will not draw fart
Fine
>will not draw slob
I can live with that
>will not draw loli/shota
what a shame....
>will not draw diapers
Fine.
>will not draw rape
what a shame. I can live without it but still.
>will not draw pregnancy
what a shame...
>>3237926
>Because those are sub-nigger tier fetishes, lad
as opposed to what, exactly? inflation? cement enemas? CONSENSUAL sex??
however i am not going to pretend my dreams aren't dominated only by torture/ scat
b/c torture is fine enough that i don't need anythin else. however i will miss scat
>>3237894
>will not draw scat, watersports, farming, slob, loli, diapers, and rape
And nothing of value was lost
>>3237894
Everything but diapers and peeing them is degenerate
>>3241113
>>3243344
>muh innocent pol obinions meemee
>everyone who disagrees with ME however is a sjw/cuck/nigger/kike/faggot/sjwcuckniggerkikefaggot
>"b-but i never implied that you sjwcuckniggerkikefaggot!! muh wall meemee. i-i'm not pol though haha"
reminder that every trumpfag is a /pol/lock or passively supports the /pol/ status quo whether they pretend they don't realize it or not. the latter is even worse because they won't take responsibility for the culture their ideals create
>>3237894
what's slob?
>>3237894
>Japanese artist
>It's censored
>>3246910
that's because uncensored porn is illegal in le superior nippon
>>3246879
conventionally?
immovable blob with food and/ or food wrappers spilled over the ground and/ or its body
however, literally the word as a fetish term only means food and/ or food wrappers spilled over the ground and/ or someone's body
(personal opinion incoming: i feel most furry slob art depicts "human" food like burgers and cooked steak and etc., which i feel ruins the entire appeal of furry content, but, i suppose fat is a very "human" fetish anyway.. still feel real animal diets or sweet food would be better)
>>3247041
so it's just trish: the fetish
>>3246933
I know. I just wished that it wasn't.
>gallery is full of hyper preg and cascading folds of fat and flab
>absolutely refuses to draw inflation
???
>scat
I've never drawn scat before. I guess if the right idea came along I'd draw it. But I haven't heard of anything that interests me.
>watersports
I like drawing watersports. One of my fetishes. Probably would draw more if people requested it.
>farting, slob, diapers
Will never get it. Just seems so infantile and asexual. It's like, OK, maybe somebody gets off to having model train sets shoved up their ass. But I ain't going to draw that.
>loli
Drawing some right now. Loli and shota. It's like the ambrosia of porn.
>rape
No problem with it. One of the first things I ever drew. Happy sex is more fun imo though.
>>3248861
as a diaper fetishist, the appeal is in connotation.
for the same reason a lover of consensual sex enjoys their lovers' moaning, a diaperfag enjoys a diapers' crinkling, as weird as that sounds.
no easy way to explain it, but, as the fetish (AB/DL) literally has a subset for age regression, it is easily explained as just memory play. Not like, literally, but it is really just connotation, connotation, connotation. Toys, pacifiers, wallpaper etc., it is about indulging in the memory (or at least the idea) of absolute no responsibility (and perhaps extreme vulnerability/ oblivion)
>>3246855
>spouts nothing but /v/-tier YOU ARE SILLY green text
>everyone is /pol/
>the over 10 million people who voted trump are all /pol/lacks
Wew, just wew lad.
>>3249131
not that anon but you didn't even respond to his post
good work lad
>>3249151
Why do I need to respond to a post filled with nothing but memes?
Do you also respond to bait and expect a real response?
>>3249192
*respond with a detailed reponse
>>3249192
it's not bait though, everything he said was accurate, you just ignored it and strawmanned his point
>>3249229
this thread is already a massive shitpost, so I don't see why
>>3249250
regardless of the thread's contents or potential a conversation of:
>here are my opinions
>here is me greentexting your opinions
>you didn't even respond to his post
is some bullshit. literal assertion and nothing else coming from all parties. but good on you i guess for conceding to that guy's empty assertion and admitting you didn't even respond to the original guy's post.
but assertion and nothing else is worthless. this is why "this is bait" memes ruined this website.
>>3249018
An adult who wears diapers has something wrong with them. It's like they've got some kind of disease, both mental and physical. It'd be like having a fetish for retards, which is probably a thing, but I'm not going to draw it.
>>3249293
the thing is is that he didn't respond to that post anon, the one thing he has right, it's "Why do I need to respond to a post filled with nothing but memes?" or rather, it's not worth a person's time to give decent responses to shitposts.
he's already shown himself to be incapable of actually having serious discussion in dodging my simple point and continuing to shitpost, so he's saved my time in writing a worthwhile post arguing against him since now I know he'd just shitpost like a twelve year old regardless.
>>3238365
>>3239350
This is retarded. If I'm going to be drawing porn it's kind of expected and, watching people get super horny over your art is an experience.
Although there are limits, like if they're suggesting doing something that sounds illegal in real life based off your drawing. Saw an issue with that. It's too far.
>>3249372
if they're doing it in their own free time as a fetish thing there's no reason you should have an issue with it
that's honestly a pretty stupid stance to take, and I say that as a person who finds diaper stuff pretty offputting
>>3247072
no because the Trishfags get autistic about someone drawing her as an actual slob. Having multiple lactating tits and maggots spilling out of her vagina is ok, but make her greasy and gassy then suddenly that's "too far".
>>3249380
i am just saying, in response to the first guy, the on who posted the "get a load of this guy" reaction should instead've proposed the logic behind why the post he's responding to is wrong (instead of greentexting the post's contents, thusly only quoting it)
You should've explained why the reaction-image posting guy didn't respond to the post, and why he should care.
I am saying, it is all a circlejerk. There is no sharing of any logic at ALL; it is sheer assertion; it is philosophically-worthless. It is as my asserting that the sky is black. It's shit. Only those who understand not that assertion alone is not a valid argument would have their opinions changed by my empty assertion, and that is called indoctrination; it is sinister, because you've proposed no logic behind your assertion.
It is a literal circlejerk. Can you not? This is no better than back and forth responses posting "this is bait" image macros back and forth to each other without end. quality conversation, guys. good shit. hope you're proud.
>>3249372
>An adult who wears diapers has something wrong with them.
but an adult raping someone doesn't?
>>3249458
I'm fully aware, what I'm saying is that I gave him one last shot to raise the level of discourse by not shitposting and he didn't. I wasn't going to continue the conversation any further after that anyway.
>>3249479
rape is a very common kink. It's an inherent sexual activity.
>>3249511
your being aware of your philosophically-worthless comment doesn't make it any less, as far as i can tell.
but, you DID manage to make that guy concede to your empty assertion, so, good job, senpai. you successfully abused someone with an argument by assertion fallacy :')
>>3249534
The capitalist argument
>I will draw rape, it has broad appeal
>I won't draw diapers, it's too niche
Good way to maximize viewers I suppose
>>3249546
>assertion fallacy
I asserted what I said once, then once again when it was relevant to the next post I made. He, on the other hand, was making no good arguments whatsoever, even with the anon talking to him before me. I think it was fully reasonable to not want to put effort into shit at that point due to the unlikeliness that it would further the argument regardless of what I did.
>>3249534
I don't think you understand what that anon is saying. You tried to make an argument based off of somebody actually acting on their fetishes in real life, yet you're saying rape is just fine now and switching your argument to 'inherent sexuality.' Which is it?
>>3249594
Not him- i am actually the diaperfag he was speaking with- but you're kinda stretching there imo.
he never established that he even takes commissions, for one, but secondly, given the context of that conversation thus far he only said he believes an adult wearing diapers means there's something wrong with them, which he wouldn't draw. His defense for his drawing rape was his opinion that rape is common and is an "inherent" sexual activity (????)
he was only saying convention = right, and unconventional = wrong
no need to bring money into this....
as you can probably deduce, i never replied again cause there's no proving that wearing diapers isn't unconventional. but also idc for talking morality at bumfuck o'clock in the morning desu
>>3237894
Maybe if you had some better fetishes people would draw things for you
>>3249229
Are you retarded, or are you baiting? We're already in the fucking /trash/, how much further down does he have to go to appease your underage ass?
>>3251069
>someone said a thing i dislike, therefore they are retarded or "baiting", underage, and also other opinions i have are true too
>also i will ignore the context you provide in your later posts because i want to react to this specific out of context one
>>3250523
>in a position to judge which fetishes are superior
>on /trash/
>>3251258
that's a big cat
>Artist lists their fetishes on their page
>See Cuckolding
>Instantly burst into laughter
>>3251258
That almost looks better than actual life
>artist claims to draw scat
>it's actually just soiling only
>artist won't draw just regular shitting, it has to be in clothes
>wonders why he doesn't get commissions
What a weird fucking standard.
>>3248565
Why do artist not like inflating? Don't they want to pump their waifu with a gallon of cum with a guaranteed chance of them getting pregnant?
>>3237894
I will never understand diaperfaggotry
>>3249372
>It'd be like having a fetish for retards
Bimbofication, do you even it?
>a artist says he doesn't do underage lewds(loli, shota, toddler etc) because it's illegal in his country
>meanwhile other drawfags continues to draw loli/shota without a care, regardless if it's illegal in their country.
paranoia is a bitch
>>3249079
Jokes on you, I may not fap to scat, diaper, watersports, farting, slob, rape or loli but I fap to xenos and plants.
>>3251292
I do it too.
>>3252741
Either of those cases are consistent. The real problem is with those irregular disappearing artists, like Simon.
>>3251267
U U U U
>>3252741
>regardless if it's illegal in their country
I know a few of those. I think it's pretty badass.
I don't know why I'm so paranoid when I live in the U.S. How do I make the paranoia stop.
>>3246855
>millions of people vote trump
>they're all /pol/
Impressive reasoning skills.
>>3249151
>if you disagree with me then you are /pol/
>anyone who supports trump is /pol/
There's nothing to argue, it's just wrong.
>>3249221
You're retarded If you think that however many million Americans who are sick of the current state of politics are all /pol/.
Unless you buy the meme that trump is a racist, which he's not. He's a nationalist.
>>3237894
the only objectionable part of that is no loli
>>3254079
Wew lad.
>>3237926
Get out normie.
>>3253170
Get arrested. Then you won't have to worry about it.
>>3253416
Nationalism is basically racism. Also, Trump is plainly racist and has been for years. I know he denies it and his suppoters deny it but their denials are just transparent lies. It's like when the KKK denies they're racist, which is a thing that they do.
>>3254079
>>3248861
You're not even going to say who you are?
>>3258486
I don't take commisisons.
>>3237894
>will not draw loli
>doesnt specify not drawing shota
>>3259069
Lots of people who don't draw loli will draw shota, and vice versa.
Oddly it's only a small minority of each who will draw loli and shota.
>>3258998
Why did you reply then
>>3259069
when artists say they don't draw loli they mean they don't draw underage in general. Nice try, you sick fuck.
>>3258998
>I wish more people asked me to draw X
>what's your account so I can ask for more X?
>I don't take commissions
>>3260576
I never ID myself in meta conversations like this. It's only asking for unwanted drama.
>>3267187
More like asking for followers
I've pretty much made it my thing to just draw whatever people get off to.
Most recently, I've drawn things like a lewd Onix, overly stretched anus, venus flytrap x feral bunny, sockjobs, hyper balls, oversized bugs, erotic melting, self impregnation, and even bugplay (the STD kind)
I'm just a really shit artist right now, and when I start having fun, someone reminds me.
>>3267277
It'd net a person few followers but more haters, I think.
>>3267457
>haters
>trash
>>>/tumblr/
>>3252835
>And plants
High five.
Also,
>Gore not on OP's list
You know what must be done.
>>3267484
ID yourself to a hater and they start following you home. Like sending you harassing PMs and reporting your tumblr for deletion. I once refused to take some guy's gore request so every time I posted a new piece he'd spam my inbox with crap.
>>3267730
You're dumb for thinking we're like some autist from tumblr, and then admitting you're from tumblr.
Go back to tumblr.
>>3267795
You're pretty much proving my point.
/trash/ is filled with all sorts of autists, psychopaths, and assorted obsessive freaks.
>>3267730
I haven't been hated on yet.
>>3267828
I haven't had any problems with revealing who I was. You might be overreacting.
>>3267929
OK, anon. Post your personal contact data, full name, and your address, and times one can expect you to be home. And I'll send you my commission info.
>>3267974
>>3267974
I meant that I had no problem revealing my online persona.
Shit like this, right?
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/7544578/
>>3249667
>idc
>(????)
how's summer kid?
>>3267828
>tumblr
>freaks
>drawing porn
>/trash/ is filled with all sorts of autists, psychopaths, and assorted obsessive freaks.
wahh wahh poor sjw here have some mlp merch and a new 50 shades of grey book
kill your self
>>3267974
mark will white
207 birch lane white house
(207)9857-4861-2939
5am-10pm
faggot
>>3268777
post your credit card info for billing purposes, just in case we agree on a commission.
>>3268889
He has trips, you have nothing, worthless faggot liar
>>3269641
he was one off from a quad, so sad
>have friends who are into scat
>like really into it
>"character who'd make your stomach explode from using you as a toilet" into it
>SEVERELY adverse to visible buttholes or any kind of genitalia
The weird thing is I've met multiple people like this.
>>3251597
I've seen this too. Worst is when they DO draw normal scat, and better than soiling, but do it so rare it's almost nonexistant. At least in your scenario there's no getting your hopes up.
>>3272866
They probably only like the girls getting ashamed and not the actual shit, seems to be the case most of the time at least
>>3272866
wait, what?
>>3237894
>complaining about this
>>3255236
>nationalism is basically racism
Wow, that's the dumbest thing I've read all week.
>trump is racist
Name an instance of trump being racist.
>>3275240
Remember when Trump called Latinos a bunch of thugs and rapists, and all the dumb Trump supporters said he was only talking about illegal immigrants not Latinos in general, but nobody actually believed that except dumb, racist Trump supporters? Remember that?
And then a few weeks later when he got caught committing fraud, he claimed the judge whole ruled against him was unfit to be a judge because he was Latino? Even though he's a natural citizen and not an illegal immigrant in any shape, way, or form? That proves both that Trump is a racist, and his supporters are liars.
But everybody (except maybe them), already knew that.
>>3275680
Except he was only talking about illegals, you moron. He's had legal Mexican immigrants on stage with him. Sorry it hurts your narrative, but he doesn't hate Latinos, only illegals.
Also he didn't even call all of them rapists, etc. He said that there are a bunch mixed in with the illegals, but since they lack papers it's hard to track them down.
And simply no, he didn't say he was unfit to be a judge. He said the case should have been thrown out, but wasn't because the judge has a bias against him.
"I believe he happens to be Spanish, which is fine," Trump said. "He's Hispanic, which is fine."
This is not racist, unless you're a hair trigger sjw, who believes in micro aggressions . This is a reason by trump to why the judge may have a bias against him, delivered in trumps blunt manner. Referring to someone's ethnicity as a source of bias is not racist.
>>3275974
This. Trump is actually one of the most slippery candidates because none of these labels stick to him.
People that believe MSNBC and FOX need to be shot. CNN is awful too.
>>3243344
Shut up. Build wall.
Just the worst opinion ever. Wow.
>>3275974
>The judge he denigrated for being Latino was an illegal.
Except he wasn't. Trump is a racist, and so are you.
And nobody's going to fall for your denials either. And what's the point in denying it anyway? You spend all your time on /pol/ denying the holocaust and complaining about black people.
Why be such a pussy and deny you're racist, when everybody knwos that you are?
>>3237894
>artist takes requests
>nobody ever requests anything
>>3277671
I have never seen an instance of that. What artist was it?
>>3277671
Lower your standards then. You probably have so many restrictions on what you won't draw that what you do draw interests nobody.
>>3278403
>I love being an art whore for people
>but I don't wanna draw stuff I don't like!
>>3278559
Not that guy, but why would you draw free shit you have no interest in? That's what commissions are for if anything.
>>3278629
This, pretty much. If you're paying me, I'll do whatever doesn't get me thrown in jail, but if someone suggests something, I'm only gonna do it if I like it.
>>3237894
>rape
Kek, I beat they don't release they've drawn this anyhow.
>>3278677
well what's your account?
>>3278629
But that's my whole point anon >>3277671 was bitching about not getting requests, and since he says he doesn't want to lower his standards, it's likely he's being asked to draw shit he doesn't want to. So why is he complaining about not getting requests if he's refusing to draw requests from anons?
tl:dr drawfag being a fag and wonders why no one asks him to draw stuff
>>3278725
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/billyroflcopter/
Like I said, I only like doing requests if I like the idea. I'm willing to say my gallery isn't incredibly impressive, also.
>>3278865
Eh, not bad, but yeah there's not alot to go by
>>3280902
Yeah, I really gotta draw more
>>3246910
can't we just go into mspaint or some shit and copy the color near the n censor bar and make a bridge between the damn thing?
>>3237894
>be patron for a while
>give suggestion for next art
>some guys joins the picarto and say's he'll be patron for $1 if he does his suggestion
>artist does it
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>3282957
wow what a sellout. You should either call them out or threaten to pull out if that's how they value their patrons
>>3276388
>knwos
Argument invalidated, nice try troll
>>3276388
Nature with a capital N is racist. Kill yourself.
>>3295241
>murder and rape is natural!
>that means it's OK!
>>3295535
>Jesus fucking christ
would that be masturbation or selfcest.
>>3277671
>Artist takes requests
>Accepts more than they can handle and never gets any done
Niggas need to calm down and accept that they aren't fucking Draw-o-Tron MK3
>>3276388
>reading comprehension
>HE'S RACISTS
>YOU'RE RACIST
I just want you to know, it's people EXACTLY like you that makes people vote trump. So please keep on.
>>3296104
I'll admit i have been guilty of this before.
>>3297994
>people pointing out I'm a racist makes me vote Trump
Suuure. And you're not a racist either. I totally believe that.
>>3302120
Wooooow, sarcasm. That totally makes people take your opinion seriously. I mean, wow, holy crap. You seem really mature doing that. I mean, when someone pretends to be a comedy sitcom character? I really make sure to take them seriously.
>>3302669
>that totally makes people take your opinion seriously
As opposed to being a racist, which is much more respectable.
>>3302884
Oh, wow. You're assuming I'm the same person who votes Trump.
Can you show me where I said I supported Trump? I'm sure you can show me, seeing how much intelligence you show with your ad hominem.
