So we've all seen this chart before. Where is the line for degeneracy? I'm trying to justify to myself that even though I've fapped and even saved some furshit, I don't know if that completely makes me a furry- I don't at all have any interest in the culture and am grossly off put by furries, especially out of the closet ones you see irl. Even though this is probably all subjective, where is the line?
Why do you want to draw a line ? Why do you want to make mental gymnastic about what you're fapping to ? And stop with this degeneracy meme.
But 3 is the limit.
1 is acceptable to normalfags
2-4 is plantigrade cancer you should be ashamed for liking. as a furfag, I will condemn you for your shit taste
5 would be ok if it didn't have an anthro mouth, which 99% of all "ferals" do in the furry fandom
everything on that chart is terrible
By /trash/ terms there is no line. Everything that has a hole is fair game to be fucked.
>>2373817
However, I stop at level 4.
>>2373837
5 has human level intelligence and is actively seducing you. It's ready, willing, and in a secure room where nobody would ever find out.
You seriously saying no?
OP here. I dabble with 2-3 occasionally, but on rare occasion I warm up to 5 when it pertains to my fetish.
>>2374037
behold: an actual retard who cannot comprehend hypothetical scenarios
>>2373737
2-3 is best
All are fuckable
>>2374612
Just because it's hypothetical doesn't mean you can excuse the flaws in your thinking.
As long as no one else knows what you fap to, who gives a shit?
>>2374769
jesus christ you cannot be fucking serious. go delude yourself into thinking being literally too retarded to comprehend hypothetical scenarios is good somewhere else.
>>2374815
>Basically questions someone's intelligence
>They respond questioning your ideas
>Gets fucking hostile
Take your special vitamins
>>2374815
Yes, the beauty of hypothetical scenarios are that anything could happen, but I'm sorry if I took it realistically to show how dumb your comment is.
>>2373737
4 is my limit.
Superior chart
5 is best
4 is the best
We need more species variants of this chart to exist
>>2373737
I want to combine them all into a horrible abomination and fuck it.
Would on-model pokemon be 4 or 5?
i'm at No.2
>>2376746
Pretty much, since the majority of them don't wear clothes, and they're on par with sapient animals in the pokemon universe.
>>2373737
>373737
wew lad
4&5 for me, please.
>>2375993
>5 if loli
>3 if with huge tits
>1 if pony
Chart's a bit off to the right. For where it should be, I draw the line at 3.
I think a fair amount of the Clop out there is edgefags thinking they're special snowflakes and that far more of it is the same few fetishists samefagging. Fetishists tend to do that in general, especially if the fetish is less popular.
>>2376746
Everything that isn't Gardevoir or Blaziken is at least a hard 4. Stop fooling yourselves, Pokephiles.
>>2373737
I want to see lewd of that girl, even if she's just there to serve as reference she's still a total qt
>>2373737
My take on it
>>2388931
I like it. Much better.
>>2388931
This is perfect
Saved for future use
>>2373737
I like this version better
>>2373737
caring about whether or not what fictional images/scenarios you fap to are 'good' or 'bad' is infinitely worse than fapping to any of those levels tee bee ayche. not that that's what you're doing, but there's plenty of people who get overly concerned by drawings and what fucked up shit the human psyche can get into and try and use stuff like that pic to justify it somehow.
also I generally stop around 3, but that's less due to me not being able to be attracted to 4 or 5 and more to do with the fact that 3 is most common
>>2373801
why don't you just go with drawn /zoo/ at this point
>>2388931
This chart is basicely /mlp/ stance with the show on 5 and EQG inbetween 1 and 2.
>>2388931
Absolutely perfect
>>2388931
I think I like this chart the best.
>>2373737
It'd be at 0.
>>2375993
You bet.
>>2373737
would do 1 - 3
3 is the best
4 is nice
5 fine too
I would do any from 1 to 5, and I would do any of them as anything from 1 to 5 myself.
>>2373737
For me at least, one and two are fappable while the rest are just cute in a non-sexual way.
>>2373801
Funny enough #1 is probably what comes to mind when the average folk thinks of what furry is.
From what I've gathered most people think furry as kids who wear cat ears, people dressed in costumes or cat girls.
I remember when that bloke who reviews
old films reviewed the movie "food fight". He basically calls the cat girl character a furry and only that one. This was amid a film full of anthropomorphic animals.
There's also a video on youtube called "top 10 furriest animes" and they're all about cat girls. This video has over a million views.
And there's that one lad who has the avater of foxy the pirate who put out a video called "sexiest furry" with the thumbnail of that Horo character from an anime.
I find it humorous because the people that like it distance themselves from furries yet a lot of people view them as such. Sorta like bronies
>>2373737
I can go form 1 to 4 with no problem, 5 only with horse pussy.
Fixed
>>2373737
There are characters who do not fit well into that chart
>>2413668
I would not consider that thing furry, although I'd question the sanity of anyone who chose to fap to it
>>2373737
4 and 5 are literally cartoon characters for children IMO because talking critters are fun. 1 is anime tier character, 2 and 3 is furshit
>>2388931
This
>>2415577
Gumball is hot.
>>2413668
it's a 3
All of them are fuckable, but I prefer 3 just a bit less than the others.
>>2374641
>1999
Jesus
>>2388931
In what world is "2" semi?
>>2388931
Good but incorrect.
>>2375959
Not actually.
>>2413668
I say 3
4>5>3>1>2
Is the only acceptable answer
>>2423900
2>4>3>1>5
>>2424728
not that guy but awful taste
>>2423900
No.
1>2>5>4>3
>>2424735
I have some kinda cuteness fetish I guess, thus 2 and 4 > all (and also kemono > furry). 5 is the only I would not fuck.
