Ok /trash/, this pic has convinced me to go gay
Why is furry cock so attractive?
>>2004535
Because the furry himself isn't real. A lot of people want the body, but in real life you have to also deal with the person. This isn't the case, since you can imagine yourself fucking that guy without having to deal with him later on.
That, or the fact that Wyntersun draws dick well.
>>2004535
Shit. Who has that chart showing how you start off looking at chicks and end up liking dicks?
Anyway furry art is highly stylized with the sole purpose of looking attractive. Even if you are straight you will eventually come across a gay pic that will hit all your buttons. Actual people however require a body that can biologically function. Therefor most dont have 2D proportions, or impossible body type that your dick loves.
Also
>that pic convincing you to go gay
>not pic related
>>2008310
oh god yes
Furry cock is not the most attractive, horse cock is. But honestly it's not the cock that is attractive, it's the furries themselves and what they do with their cocks. I can't fap to human gay porn but I will fap like a madman to furry and pony.
>>2008310
So much this.
>femboys confusing your dick
That's just how it works, anon. Accept it. It's fun.
Suggesting we turn this into a furry femboy thread.
>>2004535
You were in that /v/ thread, weren't you? The one with the FFXV Behemoth gif.
>>2008310
>not this rajii pic
>>2004535
It's a curvy feminine body with a dick, you're not gay, your brains seeing those wide breeding hips and thinking "yes."
>>2004535
>furry cock
>literally just a human penis slapped onto a furry character.
I think you might have been gay prior of that discovery.
Any other artists that draw good femboys like Zeiro does?
Femboys and Traps a best.
>>2004535
Because it's atheistically pleasing to look at. It's girthy, long, and with a complementary great set of balls that scream out "filled with cum".
Great, I made myself hard.
it's 2d and girly, the most entry level garbage there is
>>2004535
You don't go gay. You was gay before. Enjoy your sausage feast.
>>2029660
Disgusting hyper fans. God you people make shitty porn in mass.
>>2038420
not him , but what is bad about hyper?
in case you're one of those dudes who give a one-word or one-sentence reply and nothing else in order to drag things out, of your answer's "it's unrealistic", what is bad about that and why should anyone care to make that distinction, then find the content disgusting. cause anthro isn't realistic, for instance....
>>2038457
It's totally disconnecting, seeing a dick bigger than the person going into the person ruins the appeal. I want to watch porn to watch people get fucked, not disemboweled.
How's that for a one word answer you fucking shitcunt?
>>2038510
>seeing a dick bigger than the person going into the person ruins the appeal.
hyper =/= inherent penetration
>How's that for a one word answer you fucking shitcunt?
what? how are you even offended by that? you would honestly have rather I enabled this conversation to be:
>"hyper is disgusting"
>why
>"it's unrealistic"
>why is that bad?
>"it's not hot to me"
>why isn't it hot to you?
etc.? I've seen "conversations" play-out like that and they are infuriatingly selfish in their wasting the time and resources for everyone involved
>>2038601
Not him but the shape of the body is an appealing thing and warping/distorting it to fucking grotesque proportions completely ruins it and makes it look like shit. You're reducing the form to a dick or pair of tits with a body attached.
The lack of realism is also a valid complaint because it makes it more difficult to place yourself in the situation when you know it's fucking retarded looking.
Hyper is awful and ruins otherwise decent art sometimes. Though the picture posted here would look shitty even without it.
Now tell us why you think it's so great, faggot.
>>2038659
Not him, but, again, hyper does not equal inherent penetration. Assuming you mean penetration in your first paragraph, for one, am not a fan either of huge insertions. I hate stomache bulges unleww it's cum inflation/ pregnancy. my go-to hyper fap scenario is just a dude/ dickgirl with an unrealistically massive dick taking the knot from a feral dog. it's fine, to me.
but if you meant to reference hyper itself in your first paragraph and not hyper insertions, I don't think that is a fair complaint.
it's not uncommon in convention to focus attention exclusively on one aspect of the body, so the notion of hyper's possibly reducing a body's appeal to a singular trait shouldn't be considered proper criticism when the purpose of the creature is to be sexually appealing.
we know ass worship content exists. we know it's common to just fap to tits, or dick, or feet. Hyper just makes a specific physical trait or similar larger, for better contrast, and to render figuratively or literally smothering oneself with that thing easier.
I don't see why one would purposely bind themselves to the stuff of actual reality when it comes to fap fuel. the goal is to indulge in your emotion, cause it feels good. sometimes you want impossibly-large dicks, cause the way you sort your memory is such that such a cock best satisfies the sexual desire you have. idk. idk how to explain it any better.... I just like hyper. it's useful, to me. I like conventionally backwards things, figuratively-speaking, so I need the bottom in gay sex to have a bigger dick than the top. the way you do that with every animal is just to make the bottom's cock bigger....
i typed this slow cause I am typing on my tablet, sorry. I am always really scared to actually have serious discussions on 4chan so idk why I'm here.
>>2038755
>Not him,
I don't know why I said that. I AM the one that post was quoting....
and, I guess my whole bottom-being-bigger-than-the-top thing is just a fantasy. that's how I always imagine it, and it's the main reason I like hyper, but I have virtually no content on it. sadface. pic related is just a random gay sex image I have saved.
>>2038755
>Not him, but, again, hyper does not equal inherent penetration
Whats the fucking point then?
>>2038933
contrast
if it's just a big creature with a cock proportially-large to their size, that is not hyper: that is macro. you consume the content as normal content, but it is just.... bigger, and bigger relative to the stuff around it. It is normal. The contrast in macro is normal vs. the environment.
with hyper, the contrast is in, say, the specific hyper part of the body vs. the rest of the body, so the content is no longer normal. it is no longer a regular human: it is now a regular human with, for example, a big dick!!! the integrity of their being is now compromised by their having a big dick. you are consuming a creature you fetishize for being reduced to a fetish object, in the event the hyper pertains to a physical trait, and not a continuous action, as a high libido, or excessive cum, scat etc.
some people are profoundly offended by hyper, you know.......... I mean, this is the same species offended by the nudity of their own species, and systematically censors it to the point of denying knowledge of human nudity until one is 18, or 2q, or 16, yeah? the idea of reducing, say, a human to a fetish object ie clearly conventiomally morally repugnant, cause convention dictates that sexuality is something to be ashamed of, hidden, and systematicsally censored. but hyper is still a concept that scratches a specific itch, and is useful for sorting specific thoughts, and indulging in specific emotion....
I don't expect this post to be well-received at all, by the way. I should probably up and bounce. sorry.
worst case scenario, someone who lives by convention'll call me a heretic in their own way and accuse me of being contration for the sake of being such. and that'd suck. so bye..........
>>2039265
>can't pull an intelligent reply to an argument out of my arse, but want to reply anyway
>better dismiss the entire argument, acknowledge and respond to nothing in it, and reply condescendingly with an unfounded strawman referencing nothing instead
oh you guyssssss
>>2004535
They're simplified and idealized symbols of sexuality. Like totems. I mean... humans are messy complex organisms. And male-on-male is especially weird. BO and excessive body hair and shit-dick from doing it in the ass, none of that is really attractive. But with the aforementioned idealized male furry, all you get is a cute squishy thing to cuddle with a velvety ass and no drama.
Ultimately human relationships are much more satisfying, but for a quick wank nothing beats rampant imagination and fantasizing.
Once you tripped on the wrong side of the hill, you can’t get back up
Furry dicks are so exotic... I mean, how can one not fall in love with them?
>>2040103
They aren't, because dog knot is nasty, veiny, and bulbous looking, and looks like its been flayed.
I'm all for exotic looking dicks, which is why horsedick isn't too bad, but human dicks on my furries is way nicer.
>>2040155
In time you will learn to accept the knot.
>>2040347
Nah mang, too weirdly shaped and not pleasing to look at.
>>2040155
I never really liked horsecock, mostly because that flare is frightening as fuck.
>>2039265
>response argues about penetration again when nothing about penetration was said
>says the complaints aren't fair
>disregards idea of overall form being appealing
>lol its not real
>literally says he cannot explain why he likes it
Writing a lot does not mean you had a good argument, anon.
>>2044145
>>2044153
Anon, while being retarded on the internet might be your thing, you should probably stop. I usually just actually indefinitely leave threads when I say I do, but I accidentally read your reply and needed to call you out on your bullshit strawman of absolute dismissal of everything, since it was so offensive. it's nice of you to not even attempt to acknowledge your bullshit reply's being bullshit, though. real fuckin nice. quality. quality conversation going on here. this is the shit indicative of a man actually interested in defending his bullshit, yeah? when you straight ignore the shit raised against you? quality fuckin shit, mane. everyone should want to "argue" with you since you prioritize defending your ideas so heavily, yeah?????
>>response argues about penetration again when nothing about penetration was said
actually just not going to respond to anything past this line, considering that, one, I DID NOT ARGUE AGAINST PENETRATION AT ALL, as LITERALLY no "argument"- not even a shallow claim of its being bad- waw expressed by me, and certainly no logic was proposed defending any argument that I simply did not ever raise there, but I go on in the very next line to address interpreting the vague paragraph of his I might have misunderstood as if he was referencing hyper itself, and not hyper insertions.
so how about you ACTUALLY read my fuckhuge replies of argumentative text that isn't even that ass-raping of an argument, ACTUALLY acknowledge the paragraphs of argument I raised and the logic I proposed to defend my arguments, and ACTUALLY respond to and attempt to rebut them you worthless fucking shitposting piece of fuck. Nigger. Kill yourself.
1/2
>>2044145
>>2044153
>>2047009
2/2
and stop fucking cherrypicking my out of context sentence of"idk", as if that is a full fucking representation of every argument and every path of logic I fucking proposed. I literally IMMEDIATELY proceeded that sentence with "idk how to explain it any better" in the exact same FUCKING paragraph, both of which are in the middle of a fucking paragraph, so if you weren't a cherrypicking motherfucker you would acknowledge that I'd actually raised arguments and supported them with proposed logic that you are 100% completely fucking ignoring, and I affirmed that I'd raiser those exact same fucking arguments in the very fucking sentence following that claim. so, actually kill yourself. I don't understand how this extreme cowardice can be rationalized by your shitty mind to be good. literally, you are too afraid to ever actually acknowledge my actual arguments, the actual logic I proposed to support them, and altogether the actual contents of my post, so you grossly-ignore ALL of it to strawman, and you fucking cherrypick a SINGLE out of context "idk" to fallaciously reduce my argument to, then when called-out on your absolute fallacious bullshit you do the exact same fuckin thing but now without ignoring LITERALLY all content in the post besides your cherrypicked, out of context "idk", to PRETEND to have something intelligent to say. but you are still grossly ignoring my argument, and now not only grossly ignoring it, but grossly misconstruing it in ways other than your cherrypicked "idk".
now's a good time to pull the "JOKE'S ON YOU I WAS ONLY PRETENDING TO BE RETARDED" card cause your shitposting is eo inexcusable.
I have to fucking split this post up into two because the "comment too long" error never moved the quick reply window until I clicked away and clicked-back, at which point I'd already tuped 2,600 characters, and reducing it to sub-2,000 wasn't realistic.
>>2047086
the multiple-post reply was unnecessary, and not pertaining to a discussion on hyper. it was just a consequence of posting on mobile without being paranoid. in truth the post being responded to was actually so superficial and lacking in actual content it was worthless. that was just two posts of, "wow, what a worthless reply. let me explain to you why your reply is worthless".
>>2047649
Nigga this is /trash/, don't like his fetish, don't look at it.
>>2047649
this is legitimately worse than just saying "joke's on you I was only pretending to be retarded". you are actually of the opinion that straight ignoring arguments or entirely misconstruing them arbitrarily is good, and that conveying that you lack the capacity to even actually acknowledge the true breadth of the arguments you entirely ignore/ misconstrue is good.
no words. but for everyone's sake, you should stop being a selfish, forever impertinent bastard and just stop posting, since your every word is exclusivr shitposting.
>>2047756
>being of the opinion that not agreeing with something means it wasn't read
>MY ARGUMENTS ARE SO SOUND AND LOGICAL THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DISAGREE WITH THEM
>YOU JUST DID NOT READ THEM
lol ok
>>2047790
That's not what I said. you're arbitrarily-miscomstruing my arguments again, and you'rr using this as a gateway to totally, forever ignore thr arguments I raised originally to others that triggered this strawmanning butthurt from you in the first place, but you've more tham made clear that you can do nothing more than strawman and arbitrarily-ignore arguments , so responding to you seriously again would be a waste of time, since there is no reason to have any faith in the words not falling on deaf ears when it comes to you.
literally the entire "conversation" with you has been you strawmanning while arbitraroily-ignoring arguments and my responding explaining how and where you did that. there is no reason to enable your bullshit. but at the very least you will respond to this while vaguely stroking your strawmanning, arbitrarily-ignoring cock vaguely in my direction, telling yourself you're doing something good, so, have fun. but bye. how selfless of you to derail this thread with your cowardice, bullshit shitposting that literally does not actually acknowledge the true breadth of any of the arguments they're meant to be in response to at all.
>>2047943
you literally just repeated the same thing about six times over
AND THAT'S WHY WE DISCUSS PORN ON BLUE BOARDS GENTLEMEN
>>2051064
What's a blue board?
>>2051654
not sure if serious but a "blue board" is what the community dubs a board that defaults to the Yotsuba B site theme, or "style" as the site calls it. a board that defaults to that does not allow nude imagery, whereas the ones that default to "Yotsuba" do.
>>2040155
>but human dicks on my furries is way nicer.
There are no words I can use to attempt to explain how disgusted this post makes me.
You should literally kill yourself.
>abloo bloo
>>2052053
>no dick
>>2052053
>>2052070
Truly, CyanCapsule is UNF.
He went with that because there were people telling him he should take Cyanide, strangely enough.
Why are dicks so perfect. My mind is stuck up on furry dicks all day long.
>>2040347
Damn that's hot
From that look on his face I bet he's 'straight' too
>>2040551
Yeah but that medial ring tho
