> imagine /trash/ without the HG threads infestation
>Trash without HG
>Trash without pony shit
>Trash without failed /co/ thread like SU, TLH or that wanabee japanese anime made in 3D so shit I forgot its name
A great trash
>>3253209
>People on /trash/ think there is some kind of standard here or some level of potential quality
We are literally the dump-board for the shit not good enough to go anywhere else or that gets kicked off of other boards like /co/ and /x/ and whichever because everyone else gets sick of us or the threads nuke themselves on their original boards. We're the ultimate 'containment board'.
There is no potential in /trash/, it is what it is and will always be as it was. If you come here expecting or wanting anything else, you probably should go back to the listed boards where any kind of complaints like this are going to hold any meaning.
>>3253209
I don't understands how it bothers people. I don't even know what goes on in those threads buts it's really easy to ignore them.
threads like this don't help
>>3253237
What I wouldn't give to have a /trash/ like that
>imagine /trash/ without ERP threads infestation
>imagine /trash/ without furry threads infestation
>imagine /trash/ without tulpa threads infestation
>imagine /trash/ without Zootopia threads infestation
>>3255121
/trash/ is /fur/ anon
>>3257862
not Hunger Game ERPs
>>3258500
Well, what do want you /trash/ to be like?
>>3253209
>i want /trash/ without >75% /trash/'s content
I mean if that's what you want in your ideal literal garbage board then whatever fills your shitter I suppose.
>>3253237
Remember when /trash/ was like that during the first few days of creation?
>>3258734
But what exactly does that entail?
>>3259039
page 10 not being clogged with HG threads that get abandoned at 180-210 posts
>>3253237
>Trash without pony shit
How could you be so cruel as to wish an eternity in /mlp/ on anyone?
>>3259105
/trash/ was so comfy before /mlp/ decided to make this their second home. And it's mostly the shitty people who came here too like drama autists
>>3259342
>/trash/ was so comfy before /mlp/ decided to make this their second home.
How is it ruined for you?
>>3259409
>and it's mostly the shitty people who came here too like drama autists
>>3259665
Specifically in those pony threads? How are your gauging this? It's sounds like you're pulling stuff from your ass.
>>3259039
/trash/ was slower and more comfy. Then HG and /mlp/ cancer came along and had to speed things up and drown out threads. Before a thread could be up for half a day without dying. Now you have to constantly check up to make sure your thread didn't die from 8 HG or pony fetish threads appearing in bulk.
>Trash not in /trash/
What do you think this board is for?
![[Protocol4]Arakawa_Under_The_Bridge_x2_11[1080p].mkv_snapshot_19.11_[2013.07.16_18.48.18].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dJNhWfj.jpg "[Protocol4]Arakawa_Under_The_Bridge_x2_11[1080p].mkv_snapshot_19.11_[2013.07.16_18.48.18].jpg")
stay salty
>supreme overload of HG
>>3260534
>Not using the right filename
Shit imposter
>>3260437
This.
>>3255131
>/trash/ is /fur/ anon
>most posts and image replies come from hungry gaems
>hungry gaems is on the front page more often than fur threads
>/trash/ is /fur/
This is a board dedicated to the novel about kids killing each other, you dumb nigger
>>3260573
I'm not a professional shitposter, it's just a hobby
>>3260602
Well you can fuck off with your newfaggotry.
>>3260595
Small active community of autists =/= the whole board
It's always the same people in those HG thread
>>3260628
if i removed that mask, would you die?
>>3260641
>Small active community of autists =/= the whole board
That also applies to furries
>>3260645
The based starman will never die.
>>3260659
Except that furry threads makes up for at least 60% of the whole board.
They're the majority, but they're dispatched so their threads aren't bumped as quickly as the scaly thread, the Hungry gaems or those failed /co/ threads
>>3260680
YOU RUINED THE MEME YOU FUCK NOW HIROSHIMOOT WILL KILL US
>>3260437
nigga, hg appeared on the first day of /trash/
>>3260681
Here is an idea.
Take over HG become their leader.
Then disband it, destroy it once you're done
>>3260700
>implying he wants to waste in the trash
stay mad
>>3260716
I don't care that much about HG threads, I just say that they aren't as big as one may think, just hyperactive.
I tried to play but honestly I don't see the appeal, even the roleplay isn't that good, it's mostly private jokes I guess
>>3260681
We both know that isn't true. If anything, hungrr games makes up 60% of the board. Do you see how many threads they spew out?
>>3260736
It's just the nature of the HG games themselves.
I have to admit it gets pretty cringeworthy at times
But we either stay on /trash/ or we go back to a (3+1)*2 chen board ruled by nazi leaders pretending to be animu grills and starfaces
>>3260747
They only stay on one thread unless some fuck wit decides to delete the current one.
I mean sure It'd be great if they learned how to delete their threads, but they're not that big of a problem, Let the autists play in the trash, nobody should care this much in the first place.
>>3260772
>and starfaces
I feel offended.
>>3260772
You said it, /trash/ is for everyone I guess.
It will be comfy as long as everyone respect everyone, even if it becomes super quick.
>>3260437
>more comfy
what did he mean by this?
>>3260787
Good idea, just delete threads when you're done. They just take place otherwise.
>>3260803
kill yourself sheamus i know its you
>>3260813
yeah, too bad even some of our hg fags keep complaining about us needing to go back to /b/ , but we kept getting banned there
Atleast we became besties with ERP
>>3260836
>He thinks i'm Sheamus
top kek
Post avatars and rate
>>3260875
Oh look.
Another place to post my shitty opinon.
>>3253237
>Trash without HG
I don't like it but it's been here since day one. the fuckers not spamming so many threads and going on autistic rampages would be nice though, otherwise I don't mind them.
>Trash without pony shit
I wouldn't want to ban ponyshit but realistically 99% of it could go back to /mlp/ if the autist janitor would just fuck off, and this board would be better as a result
>Trash without /co/ generals
for the love of god this, all of them could easily exist on /co/ and stop taking up space on this board. the only one being here I could maybe understand is zootopia.
all that being said,
>having standards on /trash/
though I do wish this place was like it was around december through february, it was the perfect speed and comfiness
>>3269363
This so much
>"filter" not mentioned once in this thread
Just filter the shit you don't like. It's that easy.
>>3269363
>not a word about furry cancer
yiff in hell.
>>3272141
The not /co/ generals are easily filtered. But I'd say only about 10% if the HG threads actually have HG or Hunger Games written, if you try to filter them on any other criteria you're going to get unrelated casualties.
>>3272149
hey, I may be yiffing in hell but you'll be permanently stuck on something awful circa 2004
that being said I think there may have also been an influx of uncomfy shitposters from 8ch's /furry/ as well as all that other stuff, but I don't really have any way to prove that other than the amount of shitposting rising and looking especially similar to the type of idiocy you'd see over there
>>3272141
it's not an issue of a filter so much as it is general culture and board speed
>>3272639
>think there may have also been an influx of uncomfy shitposters from 8ch's /furry/ as well as all that other stuff, but I don't really have any way to prove that other than the amount of shitposting rising and looking especially similar to the type of idiocy you'd see over there
I thought the same. Lately there have been a lot of drama in furry threads. Those fuckers can't accept that their shitty board is dying and they bring their cancer over here.
>>3272663
it's really disappointing honestly. I can't say I've ever been part of the furry 'community' since I value my anonymity and am a massively awkward autist, but some of the generals here were fucking great for me. they let you have that kind of communal experience and discussion without compromising on either of those two points, and it was amazing that they managed to stay so high quality on an anonymous forum.
now pretty much all the threads I go in eventually have somebody getting mad, and my favorite general has been seemingly irreparably maimed by it.
>>3272729
>my favorite general has been seemingly irreparably maimed by it.
The straight fat furry thread?
Yeah I saw, it was pretty bad, fighting all night over pointless issue.
I guess I'm lucky, all the threads I usually post have been pretty comfy up until now, but maybe it's just calm before the storm...
>>3272747
actually the ungendered fat thread, but when I looked in that one the other day it was way more insane than I've seen any of the ones I actively participate in, so that works too
and yeah, I'd say that compared to what I've seen in the fat threads and heard about from the drawthreads most threads here still seem to be relatively comfy despite increased shitposting. I wouldn't be surprised to see it all go further downhill though.
>>3253237
This is the dream.
>>3272782
Well I hope it will get better for your generals, maybe it's just summerfags.
And to be fair, it's just that the more popular fetishes get the most idiots too. I browse pretty slow threads, with maybe 50/60posters at best( when we hit bump limit) so maybe there's that.
But yeah, I hope /trash/ will slowdown at one point. Now, we just have to fight with our own arms and must not feed the trolls and shitposters from 4*2chan or /b/
>>3259914
Because people are still somehow triggered by pony shit 6 years later. For literally no reason. These same people likely post shit all the time that others don't like, but it's not a problem when they do it of course.
>>3272835
the big issue now though is that a lot of the slow threads are dying due to said increase in speed, and it's taking a bunch of the variety with it. and honestly, I just don't see it slowing down again unless generals start moving back to their boards of origin, and even that would only be temporary.
>>3272857
>These same people likely post shit all the time that others don't like, but it's not a problem when they do it of course.
god damn I hate this mentality. I wish /trash/ had actually gone down the route of being a cesspool of gross shit that everybody could manage to find something in rather than it being flooded by shitposters who unironically give people shit for having certain fetishes. hell, yesterday I saw a guy talking about his rape fetish and theb complaining about how diaperfags were "mentally I'll." it's fucking ridiculous.
>>3272896
>I wish /trash/ had actually gone down the route of being a cesspool of gross shit that everybody could manage to find something
It was like that at first.
>>3272919
I know, I guess I meant it more in that it would be codified into the board culture. I mostly use /mu/ so the closest thing I can think of as an example would be a non-shitposty version of the pleb/patrician dichotomy, where people were actively encouraged to explore odd stuff rather than it just being accepted. it would prevent the idea of fetishes being able to be "objectively bad" from gaining a foothold like it now has.
>>3272896
>I just don't see it slowing down again unless generals start moving back to their boards of origin
this
I just want more lewd furry text adventures, writing and discussions...
>>3280991
This, me too.
>>3280991
What about that new board, /qst/?
>>3281639
They don't allow furry I guess
>>3253209
If you want good content, you need to make it yourself.
If you want good conversation, you need to start it or contribute to it.
>>3284935
Too bad HG posters outnumber the other thread posters. It doesn't help that it's now the dead hours. If only there were some people on here who could make threads to remove those dead HG threads that have accumulated on page 10.
>>3259342
If anything, /trash/ now has less pony then at the start. Fuck off, furfag autist.
>>3293183
>>3293183
u salty
b u m p
>>3295634
>complain about how slow threads are pushed out of /trash/ too quickly.
>Bump a now useless thread.
Anon...
>>3295655
not that anon but I've seen a bunch of pretty much empty threads with prompts like the OP being bumped repeatedly
I don't really get why
>>3295655
but bumping prevents threads from being pushed out too quickly especially during these hours. So I don't get what you're trying to convey here.
>>3298279
Yeah but it only applies to interesting threads. This one doesn't have anything worthwhile to bring, we pretty much all agreed that if we want a great /trash/ complaining will bring us nowhere
