DAMN she looks good.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /toy/ - Toys
You are currently reading a thread in /toy/ - Toys
DAMN she looks good.
No midriff skin though.
>>5534263
I want. It looks fantastic.
I was at a store the other night and looking at some DC figures and there was a movie WW but it looked like fucking ass. Just fucking awful. The quality control on this shit is terrible sometimes.
>>5534286
>it looked like fucking ass. Just fucking awful. The quality control on this shit is terrible sometimes.
Sounds like it matches the movie perfectly, then.
>>5534299
Kek
>>5534299
you've watched it?
>>5534538
Zack Snyder's my father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate.
>>5534263
Is that the mafex? Hot toys? Something?
>>5534657
pak
http://www.taghobby.com/1-0/1-3/square-enix-2016%E5%B9%B47%E6%9C%88%E7%99%BC%E5%94%AE-play-arts%E6%94%B9%E3%80%8Abatman-vs-superman-dawn-of-justice%E3%80%8Bwonder-woman-14800yen/
>>5534667
>pak
AKA: Bait and switch?
Well, we still have mafex.
The toy has bigger limbs than the actual "Actresss"
>>5534805
So? An improvement.
>>5534550
Then what does that make him to you?
how much money will i need to waste for this Hotglue Hierophant
>>5535323
11,300 JPY
>>5534771
I'm not sure what you mean.
PAK is one of the more honest companies when it comes to promo shots. What you get generally looks like what they showed.
I can think of numerous examples where Figuarts and Figma showed something *completely* different than what they produced.
>>5534286
Was it this one? Saw this at walmart and couldnt help but laugh
>>5534657
>is that the Hot Toys
>>5535522
Why does it look like David Duchovny
>>5534771
No PAK has poor QC and bad articulation for the price and scale. The sculpting and promos are the one thing they do right.
>>5536260
I can agree on the QC, but what else are you comparing the articulation to at "that scale"?
Even HT frequently has shitty articulation.
>>5534263
>pak
I'm good senpai.
>>5534964
Absolutely Nothing.
>>5536264
I thought HT's problem was just that the clothes restricted it too much?
>>5536905
Sometimes, sometimes they use rubber "skin" or suits too. Alot of HT are insanely delicate to the point where leaving it in a dynamic pose for too long can actually damage the figure.
>>5534263
kek
They should have CGIed this figure into the movie instead of Gal, it looks better and is more expressive.
As a former Pak collector, only MGS figures, since I bought the figma milo de venus and the thinker I think Ill only collect those and figuarts . Pak are too big and some faces are bizarre to look at.
>>5537047
That table museum stuff looks pretty rad, I've been thinking of getting David.
>>5537050
And they are mate. Thinker is ver funny to pose. Venus is more complicated, the waist is limited but it is nice to pose it too. I highly recomend it. I already pre-ordered David and will to when vetruvian Man gets his debut in Amiami fronteira page.
Man these costume redesigns just look so bland and stupid. They don't even do anything interesting, they just tone down the colors and make it look like armor, which half of them don't need.
PAK's would be better if they would make their shit in a scale anyone cares about.
>>5537205
Fuck off, you autist. Scalefags are seriously fucking killing this board.
>>5537217
God this board is filled to the brim with autists getting triggered by autists. You're all faggots.
>>5537205
They'd be better if they were $70 cheaper, seriously what the fuck is with the price? Even by nip standards that's gouging.
>>5537230
americans are dumb and enjoy playing 60 dollary doos on pointless bideo games
>>5537233
This.
The kind of people that would buy a PAK are the same kind of people that trust vidya press and buy shit on the first week.
>>5537217
8-11'' is dumb sorry
>>5537264
They're toys.
>>5537280
>having an opinion on toys is stupid
Not him, but why are you even on this board?
>>5537217
>buying a toy to be a standalone piece
>>5537291
>having a stupid opinion on toys is stupid
Fix'd that for you.
>>5537329
Yeah, no. You're response was just 'they're toys', not some reason why scales are stupid. Nice backpedaling though.
>>5537300
So? I do that if I like something, not because I want to make it fit in with other stuff.
>>5537300
Not everything's about dioramas. I'll buy a 1/6 if I like it but no way in hell am I gonna start regularly collecting shit that expensive.
