WHY?

MAFEX fyi.

>>5294503
To bust hulk...that is why. That and its freekin magnificent.

>>5294501
I'm glad I didn't go for the figuarts hulkbuster but if this thing is $400 again I'm out

>>5294516
It's $80.

>>5294524
http://myfigurecollection.net/item/369387
>Price ¥27500
>$224

>>5294501
>>5294527
Looks like the definitive hulkbuster for the scale albeit a bit expensive. Especially for those of us who can't afford the $800 Hot Toys version.

>>5297647

is it 1:6 scale then?

>>5297755
27cm so it's a little under 1/12.

That does look nice

>release date: September 2016
What.

>>5294501
Not farmiliar with MAFEX figures. How would this fair against figuarts version in QC and articulation?

>>5300194
Shit.

>>5300194
Pretty much >>5300356. Some will say they're not bad because they're refusing to admit they bought bad figures but don't be fooled. They're definitely subpar.

>>5300097
Mafex always delay their shit. It'd be surprising if this actually gets released on time for once.

>>5300194
No die-cast, no LEDs. Also expect looser joints, and from the looks of it, lesser articulation.
But those issue aside, it will probably make for a good in-between from the BAF to the SHF.

>>5300356
>>5300581

I've had a different, though admittedly limited, experience with Mafex. I have their Amazing Spider-Man 2 Spidey and Darth Vader, and I really like them both. Spidey had a couple of loose joints that I tightened up with some floor polish and now he's great. Vader was fantastic right out of the box.

>>5300194
Only have Mafex Vader but it definitely makes me regret getting the SHF one.

Though I haven't heard anything good about the other mafex figures, other than the Vader being the definite version.

>>5300194
Batman 1.0 and 2.0 are utter shit. I don't know about the rest.