>when someone gets hurt and you get to roll your First Aid skill
>>48215420
>rolling First Aid untrained using a dump stat
>someone gets infected wounds and scarring
>>48215420
FAT BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRD
>>48215530
You know it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wz_f9B4pPtg
>>48215420
Hohoho...
>>48215420
those were the days
>>48215420
>when you have proficiency in a skill that is completely redundant outside of "you wake up naked in antimagic prison" scenarios
>>48216599
>because only diagnosing an illness or stabilizing someone is listed as an example for the medicine skill, it cannot be used for anything else
this image is just for shitposting funsies no?
>>48216599
>you ALWAYS wake up naked in an antimagic prison
>>48216599
It helps if your DM is using the optional "Injuries" table from the DMG, but no DM ever does so I guess that's invalid.
>>48216803
I beseech you to bestow upon me the origins of your sheared image
>>48216599
Like... I guess if your GM is an idiot who thinks hit-point damage is the only damage you'll ever take. I'm playing a character in a game right now who was trained to be a healer/alchemist and I've used the medicine skill to do everything from set broken bones, to identify the symptoms of someone under the effect of magical poisons.
>>48220319
Honestly, Medicine should probably be able to recreate (more slowly, of course) the effects of stuff like Restoration spells.
>>48220799
Yes and no. Like... healing crushed or broken limbs, sure. Healing a limb that's been completely cut off or something like a missing eye... not so much.
>>48220799
Personally I always let my players, if they have medicine trained, expend uses from a healers kit to heal for half their rank in the skill out of combat (so 10hp if they have skill trained to 20). Makes alot more sense than carrying around a bunch of wands of healing, and allows characters who can't use magic items to heal as well.
>>48220886
To be fair, it is possible to reattach limbs if the loss was recent and amputation clean enough.
>>48216803
>>48217379
What this noble scholar said
