>millions of traditional games
>99.8% of them are played with hands
>00.01% of them are played with feet
Can someone explain this to me?
>>47810326
They're about manipulating objects, which hands are better at.
Soccer is just for hipster faggots.
>>47810326
Anti-feet prejudice is the only explanation.
EQUAL GAMING FOR PODERASTS NOW!
>>47810326
>millions of traditional games
>99.8% of them are played with hands
>00.01% of them are played with feet
>00.19% of them are played without hands or feet
Can someone explain this to me?
>>47810326
>>47811802
>OP cannot into the percentages
Right, then, musclegirl thread.
>>47810373
>Soccer is just for hipster faggots
You shut your whore mouth!
Millions of girls aged 9 and under enjoy playing soccer as well ...
>>47810326
>explain
The other 0.19% are played by chimpanzees with handfeet.
>>47813483
>The other 0.19% are played by chimpanzees with handfeet.
I was under the impression that there was just a small but active gaming community of cephalopods who played with their tentacles.
The reason nobody play traditional games with their feet is because many people who play traditional games have nasty feet.
>>47813483
>>47813537
I love you /Tg/
>>47810326
I'd play with a traditional game with her feet
>>47810326
I'm sorry OP, but neo-chimpanzees are not a target demographic for /tg/ stuff.
>>47811802
>>47813537
>>47813483
>>47812241
Sauce?
>>47816433
Gunnerkrig court.
>>47810326
Hands are Handy
Feet aren't Footy
>>47816775
>Feet aren't Footy
Wrong.
>>47810373
>Soccer is just for hipster faggots.
>using the word hipster
>ever
please just let this word die
>>47817140
I give up.
Did you have that picture just sitting on your computer for years just waiting for this very moment?
>>47817600
I just googled for "footy feets".
>>47810326
Because feet can only kick. So its limited in nature. And everything with feets will be soccer.
With hands you can manipulated objects better, thus a greater varity.
>hand = more varity but less playerbase
>foot = less varity but a big playerbase
>>47817600
Lol
>millions of traditional games
>99.9999% of them are played in using 2-dimensional manifolds in a 3-dimensional space
>00.0001% of them are played using 3-dimensional manifolds in a 4-dimensional spacetime
>Can someone explain this to me?
>>47814907
>now you too can control ANTS with your MIND
>>47810326
>Using hands and feet
>Not using elbows and hips
>>47817717
>And everything with feets will be soccer.
Or not.
https://youtu.be/RPAubjLO1gg?t=175
>>47810326
The original game of hunting is done with just chasing a scared animal to death.
Running... something fa/tg/uys may object to.
>>47818069
>They killed the winning team
>>47818181
I was about to say that they'd love (the idea of) hunting, but then I actually read your post.
>>47818197
There is still doubt whether they killed the winners or the losing slaves, because they were always warring about and futbol slaves were around.
But yes, someone got killed.
Take this shit seriously, nigga!
>>47818266
by futbol I mean ball game.
>>47810326
"Traditional games" in the sense of this board doesn't exactly refer to games which have a long history (such as football and derived sports) so much as it is a catch-all term for:
Tabletop roleplaying games
Board games
Wargames/other miniatures games
Card games
LARPs
And lore/world building discussion for any and all of the above.
With that in mind, you're conflating "traditional games" with sports, which isn't a grouping anyone really makes, so your question is kind of nonsensical.
>>47818395
I wasn't trying to suggest that football is a traditional game in our sense.
![tumblr_npo5dbHzFI1u2e015o1_500[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/lFMo3io.gif "tumblr_npo5dbHzFI1u2e015o1_500[1].gif")
>>47818069
>>47817817
Umm...
We are kinda -in- 4-dimensional space.
>>47819249
>4D Space
Nope (almost) 3D space and 1D time combined to (almost) 4D space-time
>>47819315
How are both of those 'almost'?
>>47819401
I can sadly not find the article, but I remember that it basically said that our space is not 3 but 3 ± 10^-16 dimensional, which means that for everyday purposes it behaves like 3D but not at extremes
>>47819471
here is a similar article (though not the same topic)
http://phys.org/news/2009-03-spacetime-fractal-properties-quantum-scale.html
>>47819401
>>47819471
This. Ex:imagine spacetime as simply time and space seperately. We treat everyday as space and its 3 dimensional movement. Forward back, left right, up down(XYZ). Now think of how we experience time: forward. We technically only experience it as a .5 dimension addition to everyday life. this means our daily life is 3.5 dimensions and not 3. However beyond the 3 there are several other dimensions(between 7-16 more) we experience as much as .1-9 at extremes such as lightspeed movement or blackhole event horizons.
Mind you this is an extremely bastardized version but it helps you frame it in your mind.
If you had to think about it. The earth is a 2 dimensional manifold in 3dimensional space due to the fact we can only move in a 2dimensional manner on its surface. Technically it makes it non-euclidean elliptical geometry.
Ex:you start at the equator and make a 90 degree left turn towards the nothpole, you reach the northpole and make another 90 degree left turn, you're back at the equator and make another 90 degree left turn and you're back where you started. You just made a 3 sides square 90 degree corners and all. Technically you reduced the average 10x10' square into a 7.5x7.5' square per 10sq foot sharing the same space. Arguably you could keep doing this procedure and on paper reduce that whole 1/8th of the planets surface by 1/4th every time into oblivion.
