>The most prolific rapist of all time was likely born in the following century: _________
Can anyone help me answer this question? I need to know for my time-traveling Call of Cthulhu campaign.
21st
>>47776323
Whichever century you're prepared to have everyone travel to
I'm loath to ask why you need to know this anyway, ya creep.
>>47776323
20th
>>47776409
Have you seen the movie Time After Time?
I'm doing something like that.
>>47776323
There are no accurate rape statistics. Ever. So make it up.
>>47776323
OP, how are you defining rape? Its a concept that changes and varies throughout cultures. Are you counting men who coerced their wives pre-1980? What about women taken as spoils of war, which only stopped being acceptable in some cultures after 1950?
The 40:s perhaps?
>>47776323
Genghis Khan might actually be a strong candidate.
>>47776455
>OP, how are you defining rape?
Unlawful penis insertions into strange women.
There are 1.6 billion muslims in the world, what man could be more profilic than the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) who famously raped his young bride Aisha at six years age. Born 570 CE.
>>47776323
Late 20th. Just wait for it
>>47776517
Except Islam in contagious, not hereditary.
>>47776536
>Just wait for it
But the 20th century is already over
>>47776512
Ok, but which law? Many things would be considered rape today that were not in antiquity.
>>47776552
Yeah, but people born at the dawn of it are only 16-17 now and may still have much raping ahead of them.
>>47776517
I thought the story went that he married her at six, but waited till she was nine to fuck her? Am I mistaken?
>>47776552
>Late 20th. Just wait for it
He is implying the rapist is alive now and will be revealed to be "the most prolific rapist of all time" in the future.
>I need to know for my time-traveling Call of Cthulhu campaign.
Nice try.
>posting in a fetish thread.
>>47776323
Easily the late 20th or early 21st century. It'll just be the heterosexual man who looks at the most women, whether in person or on the internet, without getting their permission to cast his gaze upon them first. Each of those women has been brutally eye-raped by that nameless man. Hundreds, possibly even thousands of brutalized women every day, for the entirety of his life.
Hope you're proud of that legacy, men.
>>47776605
No, you're right. He was quite the gentleman.
>>47776504
What is it, the average person got 2% of his DNA from Genghis Khan? More than double that if you're from Russia or Asia?
He's the arch-rapist of all time.
>>47777536
So far.
>>47777296
With the new ruling against thighing, things might change on that front.
>>47777701
>new ruling against thighing
>thighing
The what? Intercrural?
>>47776323
1900-2000 because it had the most people in it, I bet?
More people = more chance one of them is the top rapist
>>47776540
>Islam is contagious, not hereditary
So, what you're saying is that Islam can be cured?
>>47777768
Yeah, especially when treated at early age.
>>47777725
When you marry a girl who's pre-pubescent, you can cause serious medical problems consummating it, like hemohorraging, broken pelvises, etc. So "thighing" was an acceptable substitute. Your new wife would keep her legs together and you'd stick your dick in her thigh and kind of hump until you came that way. Or, sometimes, her butt cheeks.
By "you" of course, I mean muslim men in the arabic world, where this is legal. In the West any of this would get you put away in jail for life, and rightly so.
Anyway, there was a recent fatwa from a prominent cleric on the practice, and whether it counted as consummation and whether it was a halal practice. Apparantly, it isn't, so now the speculation is that they'll go back to consummating marriage in the old-fashioned, life-threatening way. And apparantly just saying girls that young can't marry 50 year old grizzly men was out of the question, too.
>>47777768
With moderate doses of white phosphorus
>>47776323
It depends on if you define rape by the century's standards or not.
If each century gets its own standards, than probably the 22nd, shortly before the collapse.
>>47777842
What a profoundly diverse and wonderful culture.
ONS/EAR was in the 20th.
Statistically, more people have been born in the twentieth century than any other, so absent any good data on how common rape was it's a fairly good bet that any random high score was most likely achieved by a twentieth century dude.
>>47776323
Given the image, I'm surprised no one brought up Gengis Kahn
>>47776323
Is "Ancient Greece" a century
>>47778193
Well that's just foolish. It's not like you're measuring per capita or something, and few people in the modern era spend decades on a military campaign like they did in Genghis Khan's day.
Maybe it's really just some randy soldier who survived the 30 years war start to finish.
>>47776323
Probably a Mongol somewhere who just a gorillion Chinese chicks.
Alternatively, some Soviet soldier who plowed every frau between the Danube and the Rhine. Awful lotta rape in the aftermath of WWII. Most people assume it was Ivan, but reports suggest it was more often the Central Asian soldiers they started drafting once they started running out of white people to feed into the German meat grinder.
My money's on a Tatar. Worthless race, rape is really all they're good at. Hopefully the Chinese will remember this and ethnically cleanse Mongolia in a few years.
>>47779672
>My money's on a Tatar. Worthless race, rape is really all they're good at.
I'm told by the fish-people that they also make good sauce.
>>47776599
>people born at the dawn of the 20th century
>only 16-17
dear god the stupid.
>>47777777
test post please ignore
>>47782713
well it takes all types to have a traditional gaming board i guess...
>>47776323
20thits me
>>47776567
You're probably wasting your time. If they didn't already understand the problem with what they were asking, explaining it's not going to suddenly enable them to respond meaningfully.
>>47776323
Ghengis was born in 1162 CE (the 12th century) if that's what you're going for.
Otherwise just make shit up OP
>>47783218
Ghengis has got nothing on Gary. That guys is an asshole.
>>47777842
>lovers helping each other masturbate should rightly get you put in jail for life
If you're really going to try to convince me that Aisha didn't want to be consort to what amounted to an Islamic Jesus, you better try real fuckin' hard.
>>47776512
Wait wait wait, so unlawful penis insertion into ordinary women isn't rape?
It's either Genghis, Tiberius, or Muhammad.
Just depends on where you draw the line between rape and molestation.
>>47784021
of course not, only strange women dont appreciate unlawful penis insertions
>>47776323
Whatever century your players hail from.
>>47777296
He also liked cats. So much, that the muslims still torture dogs for fun.
>>47784090
>Marital rape is not a thing
>Incest is ok
>>47784294
I think you're taking this a bit too seriously.
>>47776323
Genghis khan
>>47777842
You could have just said "yes" instead of defining your made up term for it.
>>47781215
Your pun is dumb but not dumb enough to be funny for its dumbness.
>>47776323
22nd
>>47779469
>Given the image, I'm surprised no one brought up Gengis Kahn
Given the fact that you're anon, I'm not surprised at your absolute lack of ability to read the entire thread before posting
>>47776504
>>47777536
There's literally zero evidence for that being Chinggis.
>>47776323
Probably some Assyrian Bronze Age lord.
>>47784767
It's a real term, google it.
>>47785652
http://www.nature.com/news/genghis-khan-s-genetic-legacy-has-competition-1.16767
You must have a strange private definition of "literally zero evidence".
>>47785752
Although famously infertile, Julius Caesar was so well known for raping defeated enemies and their families that his soldiers had a song about it.
>>47781215
gb2 le reddit pun thread
>>47776323
Berlin 1945Nankin
and probably a few more. War turns people into beasts.
>>47776323
Rapist, or murderer-rapist?
The distinction is important.
What if we expand the meaning of the word to it's long-abandoned previous definition: "taking people" in any context?
>>47776323
12
Genghis khan
>>47776357
You think the most prolific serial rapist is 16?
>>47787592
>You must have a strange private definition of "literally zero evidence".
>>The variation that did exist in their DNA suggested that the lineage began around 1,000 years ago in Mongolia.
>>Genghis Khan is reputed to have sired hundreds of children
These are not evidence of any kind.
>>47776469
That may well be a real book, but if I were the first author I would have used a pseudonym.
>>47787592
If it's a real term, it's a redundant one invented by idiots. Saying "but I'M not the one who made this bullshit up" doesn't make it not stupid.
>>47776323
The one they invented time travel in
>>47784767
>tfw people don't know about intercrural
