Are magical realms okay when they're played up for laughs?
>>47177837
Yes and no
No.
>>47177837
Yes.but only if it is for jokes
Depends on the magical realm
Depends on the group
Depends on the setting
Probably not
>>47177837
I played a gay black dwarf bear barbarian that raped people for a one shot.
It was pretty funny, although the DM clearly didn't like me raping that Troll.
>>47177953
It would be a godo chance to get out some cheesy innuendos.
>I love warriors in full armor. They're so hard.
>I don't need somatic components to work magic with you.
>>47177862
that was quite a read
>>47177862
>was expecting The Aristocrats.
>instead there is only shame.
>>47179198
what? its a really nice clock.
look how big it is.
>>47177953
oh and something not related to the thread,you cannot get blue eye in that style of eyes for the male villagerI'm very disappointed in Nintendo, but that is to be expected from them right now.
but yeah, sexual innuendos are fun as hell, especially when you play with fucking prudish people.
>>47177837
You can parody magical realms for laughs, but a real magical realm probably won't be funny.
>>47179900
>i tell dick jokes in mixed company
>because fuck your decorum
>that's still edgy, right?
4chan is 18+ only, kiddo.
>>47177837
Depends on how big the girlcocks are
>>47181831
To be fair my wife tells dick jokes in mixed company.
>>47177837
Did the group have fun with it? If so, then yes.
>>47181910
>>47181831
>women are cool and funny when they break taboos but men are edgy and creepy
>>47182111
Nobody brought gender into it until you did.
>>47182233
I'd get into that gender, if you know what I mean.
>>47182233
Yeah learn what "mixed company" means. Go on, look it it, then come back to the thread.
>>47177837
If it's played for laughs then it's not actually a magical realm.
>>47182268
huh?
>>47182268
It refers to the audience, not the speaker. "I make dick jokes in mixed company" doesn't indicate the gender of the speaker, nor does the original response of "That's childish." Gender of the speaker wasn't a factor until the "bawwww this is unfair to men'" comment.
>>47182432
>>47182461
>Nobody brought gender into it until you did.
>>47182520
Do you get some sort of validation from being a pedant who deliberately misses the point? Am I being rused by a shitposter?
>>47182578
>deliberately misses the point
The point was that posting "deliberately offending people is hella fun" was a juvenile sentiment - just like posting stories about pulling your Magical Realm out at someone's table. Adults have sex IRL, so we don't need to fantasize about it with a group of panting neckbeards - and when underageb& faggots try it, it's just creepy. So, no. Creepster faggotry is never okay. No matter how funny you think your dick is, you're wrong.
>>47182578
The point, idiot, is that the social taboos for "mixed company" are the social taboos for men around women. They don't apply to women, just like they apply regardless of how many men the "mixed" company has.
>>47181869
It doesn't bother you when she mentions your sex life like that?
>>47177837
If you have to ask, then the answer is no and you should go get a fucking girlfriend already.
>>47182697
On the other hand, doing it with someone who gets embarrassed but not offended is fucking hilarious.
Especially when you know they're blushing because they're really enjoying thinking about it, and that they turn into a total freak in the bedroom.
>>47182701
Man, dudes are really obsessed with dragging gender politics into everything.
>>47182839
Wow, sexist.
>>47177837
What if I play mine up for horror?
>>47182839
Actually, this guy >>47181831 brought up gender politics if you follow the reply chain.
>>47182839
Maybe when feminists all fuck off and die men will no longer be justified in doing so.
>>47182520
>>47177837
I thought it was. Turns out our GM is very, very depraved.
>>47177837
Does MR have to be sex-related? I make a lot of references to the Holocaust and WW2 whenever I'm running a game, and a lot of the time people don't even get it.
Seriously tough, the only requirement for it to be ok is if everyone is fine with it, regardless if it is serious or not
>>47183030
Wow, men really are bad at controlling their emotions. Try being a little more rational.
>>47183121
>a feminist telling someone else to be rational
>>47183091
I would say you can have political magical realm and one could even say sexual magical realm is a subset of political magical realm.
I got so damn tired for awhile of reading fiction because it seemed everything was the author's hot political opinions + views on sex. Not even political opinions and sexual views I particularly found disagreeable, just really patronizing.
However, references people don't get isn't magical realm. "The dire jew latches onto your money pouch, minus 12 gold points" may be magical realm however.
>>47183203
>not wanting submissive libertarian fiction
>>47181831
Fuck you, my grandmother, grandfather, girlfriend and I spent a good part of yesterday telling dick jokes to each other and it was good family fun
>>47183203
>I would say you can have political magical realm and one could even say sexual magical realm is a subset of political magical realm.
And since I feel this needs to be expanded: I suggest the default, sexual magical realm is ultimately political in nature, because it intrinsically involves the public affairs of the campaign setting being warped beyond probability to satisfy the peccadilloes of the author.
Basically the overriding theme is taking something that should be private, making it VERY public, and making people act VERY improbable to satisfy your private peccadilloes. Politics and sex both fit.
>>47183277
If taken out of context then D&D does look like a very deranged ancap fantasyland, though this is more due to what makes a good game than political views (gold is tangible, physical conflict is tangible, sneaking and traps are tangible, death is usually binary)
>>47183316
>kingdoms and empires and city-states
Get that statist shit out before calling it ancap!
>>47183401
The usual assumption does seem to be that they are useless, NPC kings etc. are useless; the only thing that matters are how rich the PCs are, and any taxation or prohibition on what weapons the PCs may buy means the state is automatically in the wrong.
Presumably, say, a commie oriented RPG would still have capitalists in it, they would just range from outright antagonists to obstructionist useless retards with regards to the PCs, ie the role of the existing 'statists' in most D&D campaigns.
>>47183579
Good point. Plus evil empires are the villains. And it's mere semantics between adventuring party and adventuringCOMPANY
>>47183598
I usually use adventuring company, myself. Never really realized the possible crossover between military company and capitalist style company.
>>47183667
(in terms of the origins of the word)
>>47177837
Yeas
>>47181937
My fetish too.
>>47177837
Depends, are you saying it's played up for laughs when in reality you're trying to conceal your awful boner?
No?
Yes, you are.
It's bad.
It depends.
My magical realm is monster chicks, which is admittedly is one of the easier magical realms to insert into a fantasy game. I've got an NPC who constantly gets "kidnapped" by monster women, with the party being hired by his nobleman father to rescue him.
He's basically trying to get laid with something that will most likely either suck out his soul, eat him, or make him their slave for all eternity after they're done with him. So it's less that he's being kidnapped and more looking for monster pussy and getting into dangerous situations, but obviously the "kidnapped" explanation is the story the nobleman would rather put out.
Each of his escapades end up with him closer and closer to getting laid, but the party ends up "rescuing" him right before anything can happen, much to his dismay.
My group thinks it's hilarious, but your group might not. When doing something for humor, you have to think about what your group will find funny and acceptable. Obviously, you wouldn't make humor out of magical realm if you're playing with something like a church youth group, but when you're around like-minded perverts and degenerates, it's all in good fun.
>>47183190
thatsthejoke.jpg
>>47177862
Uh. I visit /d/ on occasion but that shit is slightly over the line i am used to.
>>47177837
Though i believe it could be OK in theory, i wouldnt want to be involved in such game.
>mfw my original point was Litterally do what >>47179312 has done in front of Mormon players.
>thread devolves in gender poltics.
People need to stop being so offended by dumb shit, I swear.
>>47187076
I mean, I do gebuibely believe that flavor of redpill fedora is pretty irrational, but you're right that the joke was just turning standard "ugh, women" complaints back on him. I gave up because he just kept rising to the bait so quickly it wasn't fun anymore.
If the players actually laugh an no one is uncomfortable, sure.
>>47187409
Gets depressing when you realize the other party actually takes it seriously, yes.
>>47177837
What if I play mine for screams instead?
>>47187235
/tg/ is incapable of talking about Mormons without going into an autistic shitfit.
>>47177837
Well, the terms in your post are so vague that answer loses a lot of its meaning.
>define magical realm
>define okay
and while you're at it explain why is not-played-for-laughs magical realm not okay.
Then maybe we'll have a thread that will nurture interesting dialogue.
>>47177837
If its non-intrusive, is not meant to be sexual, and the players are okay with it ahead of time, then it even be considered to be Magical Realm anymore?
>>47187706
Your players must love you
Once had a sex scene with a female DM who had a thing for minotaurs (playing a minotaur bard) front of the whole group. I didn't know these people, having taken the DMs number who was recruiting from a local game shop so I didn't care for them anyways. The line that started it all was some gnome bar lady offering us drink
Me
>baby you rolled a natural 20 on your seduction check and I don't have the will save to overcome it.
Pretty good game, the 3 other players were obviously u comfortable but who cates.
>>47187689
It's hard to discuss a religion in serious terms when your grandfather's grandfather was alive during the creation of their mythology.
See also: Scientology.
>>47188730
>retards from the bronze age are more credible than retards from 200 years ago.
>>47188787
Don't you know that repeating the same lie over and over again makes it magically real?
If everyone involved is fine with it it's not magical realm, despite what some parts of /tg/ may tell you.
Yes, absolutely. Magical realm is OK in general, until someone in the group says it's not.
>>47187181
>/d/
>over the line
Someone call the virgin police
>>47189004
I guess certain thing feel different in lonely darkness of my basement and in broad daylight and company of other people.
What are magical realms?
>>47189004
it could bewesternyou know
>>47189049
That'sindeed correct, fantasy doesn't equal to real sex and both can be enjoyable separately, and mixing them up doesn't always work out.
>>47183091
I fucking hate that show for wasting the potential of a viking vampire and his master, rooting out warewolf packs in the third reich.
It was such a fucking cocktease. all we got was one minute.
>>47188787
It's like knowing that something wasn't always around and just being raised with it and such a history of it you couldn't imagine it not being around.
The former lets you know that it's new and erases any idea that you might have that it's intrinsic, while the latter gives an illusion of hundreds of years of agreement. You can pass off anyone before that point as just not knowing enough to realize the truth anyway.
>>47188896
Also this. Magical realm, by its definition, is exclusive to the the GM and/or perhaps another player. It's something that's uncomfortable to force on the group.
If I took a group and promised them all sexy amazon women, and they all liked it, it's no longer magical realm.
>>47188787
Arguing with the wrong person, friendo. Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence. Still, it makes some internal sense why theists reject "young" religions while lending more credence to older traditions.
>>47189049
This. Some things are better kept secret and not looked at as more than a fetish or kink that you're slightly ashamed of. You might not even agree with all of it, or feel disgusted after the fap, or really like only certain specific details. /d/ can go crazy when you take a general topic and allow anything related in, across the spectrum.
Cuteness and vanilla sex, however, will stay attractive for a long time.
>>47189081
Putting shit you get off to into your games and making everyone else experience it.
If you are a DM that likes girls being sex slaves and you keep putting your party in situations with female sex slaves to get you off, it's a magical realm.
What matters is are the players ok with your magical realm shit.
>>47177862
I laughed so hard when I read that at first
>because that one player ended up refusing to have his characters head inserted into the woman's ass so that he could suck off the baby's dick when we reinserted it
FUCKING HELL
>>47189261
>Cuteness and vanilla sex, however, will stay attractive for a long time.
This man speaks the truth. Don't believe what some people may say: Enjoying vanilla isn't bad at all.
>>47188694
Minotaur bard... I've never seen one of those before.
>>47189399
What if I get off to my players enjoying the game?
No, it's not OK to laugh at my fetish.
I play a very adult game with my wife and our roommates who are dating. Very one takes turns dming every know and then. Always a few beers are involved and frequent petting. Shits pretty cash actually. Probably one of the best games I've ever played.
>>47189686
Then make an enjoyable game for them, I guess?
>>47189789
That's called swinging, anon...
>>47189811
There is some swinging involved but it only takes place around the table.
>>47189811
What are the rules? Do you get points? How do you win?
>>47189848
As far as the rules goes it's just 3.5. Someone usually wins every game, adventures like brothels and bar wenches. Shit comes up and we play through it.
Did the "magical realm" joke come from the KC Green D&D piss joke?
>>47189885
>it's just 3.5
But anon, in swinging wizardsare nerfed
I have a fetish for fairies and minigirls, so my magical realms are pretty normal for D&D tables. Nobody hate fairies right?
>>47189942
Yes
>>47189977
It might be just a coincidence but everyone has gravitated towards charisma based classes. No wizard in the party. As much of a joke as it is we use feats and spells from the book of erotic fantasy. I thought the stuff in there wouldn't add anything to the game but our scorceress dropped a spell that strips a person of all non magical equipment including clothes. Surprisingly useful.
>>47190031
>Onaholes with wings
Glad we got rid of those pagan abomination with the power of the lord.
>>47190031
Is it really your magical realm, though? Are they trying to romance humans, or is it an abnormally large amount of fairy races and cute little travelling companions who pop out of the character's satchel at the last minute with a potion to help them beat the boss?
>>47190140
They probably just bathes in cum and use their pixie dust to refuel balls knowing anon.
>>47190166
I am legitimately curious to see if he plays it straight or not. If he breathes a little heavy when I gently pat my fairy friend on the head with one finger and call her cute, it's not that bad. If he's stripping the wizard of his clothes and surrounding him with tiny naked pixies grinding against him, that's just kind of fucked up.
>>47187689
>>47188730
My orignal post that started it all was this >>47179900 which one fuckhead >>47181831 took the word "prudish" which can describe conservative people who can be religous person, and thought I said "women."
Protip: women can make sexual innuendo just as well as men, being or having dirty mind is not limited to what's between your legs.
>>47190140
>>47190287
I try to hold back my lewdness, so I just end up using them a lot as guardians and companions for some quests. And I use the Feywild plane in 5e a lot. I made up a lot of plot points there, just to have the excuse to use more fairies. And I made a lot of homebrew fairies.
>>47190166
N-nothing of the sort.
>>47177837
If you're just doing weird sexual jokes and everyone's laughing then it's fine.
Magical realms are never funny, because if you're just poking fun at the piss forest in a casual one-shot it's not magical realm. If your fetish is the piss forest, it's never just for laughs, and you've tricked your party into smiling at something that gives you a boner.
>>47177837
Only if the owner of the magical realm ends up in tears from the mockery
>>47177837
And how would you do that? I think it will depend more on your players.
>>47189789
I shouldn't be jelly but I want to mix swinging women and swords
>>47190592
Well then that's not magical realm then, that's just cute. If you counted everything you were attracted to as magical realm, no matter how you included it in a game, most people would constantly be in some form of magical realm.
>>47177862
This is what average lively channel looks like on f-list.
(Yes, the detail "lively" is a necessary qualification because overall average channel status is a dead wasteland.)
>>47181832
So big that they pass out whenever they get an erection
It depends on the fetish and how deep you go into it, if my DM has an amputation fetish I have no problem with him adding crippled girls, I can even tolerate him sexualizing and explicitly describing the mutilation of a NPC once in a while, but if he stars to mutilate PCs just to get himself off then it becomes unaceptable
As a general rule if the magical realm starst to affect the PCs it's a sign you've gone too far
>>47195986
That's sad, not funny
>>47177837
If you have to ask, the answer is no.
>>47177837
Yes
If it's funnyOr sexy
