What deck(s) do you play?
Are you going to GP Columbus?
As always, counterfeit users are not welcome here.™
>>47134081
>tfw my edh decks have more value than any legacy deck
>tfw my format is stronger than ever and has full wizards support.
>>47134081
>Poorfags need not apply Edition
>Implying I can't just steal a legacy deck
>>47134081
ITT:
>proof that legacy is dead
>>47134443
ITT: proof that /tg/ is filled with poorfags
>>47134877
actually /tg/ is filled with expensive money-sink hobbyists so why is legacy the only thread that is so decrepit and dying?
>>47134139
I love EDH, but fuck if some people aren't total manchildren when it comes to it. Be prepared to be called satan himself if you dare interrupt someone's big play. Fuck no, I won't let your entwined Tooth and Nail resolve dipshit.
I get that EDH is a place for splashy, wacky stuff, and I love it for it, but please let something other than creatures: the tappening be a part of it sometimes.
In my experience, it's the standard/EDH-only crowd that whines the most, the legacy-players usually bring the most fun to the table.
>>47134081
>>What deck(s) do you play?
UB reanimator hereand dredge
>>Are you going to GP Columbus?
No, on account of being yuropean. Thinking of going to the next stop of BOM though, if I can get some byes at the next local trial.
Also, japanese > foil imo
>>47134081
>What deck(s) do you play?
ANT. I got the pieces before the price spike on LED and duals, so still a poorfag.
>Are you going to GP Columbus?
No probably not. Don't have time.
>>47135649
Edh is my format. And locally I've found groups that play the way I do (for the most part) but on these boards holy fuck.
I don't play any infinite combos or MASS land destruction. I play magic to play, not sit out and (for the most part) I've been lucky enough to find players with similar playstyle. /tg/ makes me think everyone I don't know plays MLD and combos ASAP and if they don't they are casual faggots who cry about everything. Why is it so black/white here?
>>47135701
>japanese > foil imo
Your opinion is correct.
Pic related, you can guess what I play in Legacy.
>>47135644
Because the /tg/ demographic would rather spend $4000 on plastic figurines than cardboard.
>>47135644
Because I don't need a support group to make me feel better about my hobby
>>47137433
Really weird build of UW D and T?
I like Russian cards, Cyrillic looks pretty cool. Foils are pretty shitty in general.
Just finished my playset of forces. Feels good.
>>47139592
Good choice. When EMA drops, they'll go up as people realize the old art is the best art. Also, that the influx of new FoWs won't meet demand.
>>47139751
Same, new force art looks like even more generic "waves hands with blue shit coming out" art. In the original card, the guy looks like he is actually struggling, and giving it his all. It was a unique take on the usual counterspells art. Pretty disappointed Terese fell into that trap for blue cards art.
my legacy decks. first Pox
>>47141938
and then Doomsday
>>47141957
I've actually since changed the Doomsday list. Dropped Maniac, Chromatic Sphere and land for 2 Lotus Petals and a Chain of Vapor, I think it runs a lot more smoothly and gets faster wins.
>>47141957
>fake Badlands
>1 fake Usea
Well, at least you're trying.
>>47141957
>>47142006
Scratch that, all 4 of your duals are fake.
GTFO poorfag.
>>47141957
>>47142243
AND your LEDs are fake. Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting.
>>47142261
Mmmm I don't think those LEDs are fake.
>>47142261
At least 1 Sea and the Badlands are real as well as the LEDs. Honestly, I've always been a little unsure about 1 of the Seas but I'm pretty sure it's real. I got them long before the more recent huge wave of fakes. At any rate, there is no way you could tell from my low-quality phone pic, but I know it was bait anyway.
>>47142261
The fact that 3 of 4 LEDs are obscured almost completely leaves me to believe you are retarded.
>>47143271
Not the other guy but there's an easy way to tell: look at the black frame separating the frame of the card from the white border. It should be a well-defined, solid line. If it's fuzzy or the rosette/dot pattern is part of it, it's a fake.
>>47143398
I'll keep that in mind, thanks. With the old cards there's such variability in print quality it can be hard to tell.
>>47134081
> What deck(s) do you play?
LED Dredge (aka real dredge) and Death and Taxes
>Are you going to GP Columbus?
Yup, gonna be playing death taxes with hopes of making at least top16
>What deck(s) do you play?
A sub-optimal meme deck
http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/tumbling_downavimp4gifdec/
>Are you going to GP Columbus?
I wish, but unfortunately I have a job.
>>47143537
I'll have my D&T list finished in time, (1 karakas, 2 ports, 1 wasteland) but I'm not going to take that weekend off. It's wedding season at work and I need to be on-hand.
What's your list look like? I'm leaning towards 3/3 maindeck mangara and spirit of the labyrinth because stone raining people with mango is my shit and fuck brainstorm decks.
You're going to have to play for the both of us at Colombus though, so if you get camera time just go ahead and stone rain some nerds on my behalf. Thanks, friendo.
>>47134081
>What deck(s) do you play?
ANT all day erry day. I really need to swap my second volc for a second usea though.
>Are you going to GP Columbus?
Nah, local meta is very bad for combo in general. I know I should build maverick but I can't get the lands for a price I'm willing to pay.
>>47145774
I used to play a super average list aimed more for the very combo centric metagame at my lgs, but this is the list ill be taking to the GP
> http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/08-05-16-death-and-taxes/
pic related (Warping Wail) is one of my favorite new cards btw, i think it has tons of potential in D&T and my testing with it so far has very favorable
>>47146283
I strongly advise using Mango if you're running Karakas, Flickerwisp and Aether Vial.
Here's my list. Thinking about running another Cavern but Wasteland is still a thing and we're already really heavy into nonbasics.
http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/08-05-16-death-taxes/
>>47137720
Is that a joke, or are you being serious?
>>47137433
I just found out that Japanese Terminus doesn't cost all that much, thinking of picking some up one of these days.
>>47139592
>>47139751
>>47141806
Same, it really is the best time: I only spent 40€/piece, which is fair imo. Format defining cards like this will only go back up, or at least stabilise, even if WotC in all their benevolence decide to print it in every EMA after. The only shame about Alliances FoW is the limited number of languages it was printed in.
>>47143879
what the actual fuck
>>47141957
>upside down sleeves
>fake cards
>mismatched/ugly art
>white border/black border mixups
So much is bothering me in this pic. Yet, Doomsday is cool enough for me to look past that.
>>47134081
>decks
Goblins, TES, Grixis Delver
>GP
Nope, but I am going to GP Prague and MKM Frankfurt next week. Will probably play TES at MKM and see how that goes.
>>47146283
>>47145774
mycurrent list. I havent got to play it in awhile due to work. forgot to picture the 4thalia and four mothers
>>47136095
4chan is a counter culture imageboard, and thus has a lot of contrarian posters. Also posters here seem to have a very extreme sense of "us" vs "them" mentality.
>>47147386
Despite what that that one ass clown said, none of my cards are fake under the closest scrutiny I could give. Incidentally, the upside down sleeves and mismatched art is precisely to trigger pepole who get unreasonably worked up about such things. It pleases me.
Wow what's up with all the DnT players on /tg/?
>>47148941
DnT is a cheap deck by legacy standards, so expect it to be popular.
I'm a poorfag and I know burn sucks in Legacy, but I have a lot of the cards for it already in my pauper deck.
How important are fetch lands for a mono red burn? That is obviously the biggest cost next to Goblin Guide.
Any of those fakes look good enough to play? The local place allows proxies.
>>47148996
If you don't play grim lavamancer, you shouldn't run fetches
>>47148929
When you say it "triggers" people I'm assuming you mean they point out how shitty your deck looks?
>>47139751
Old art sucks. I just have it cuz is the one the chinks sells
>>47149465
I really don't understand why people don't like the old art. It seems really evocative of the card to me.
>>47149377
That and it seems to genuinely bother some people. They mention it multiple times in a match, get more fidgety than normal, egregiously misplay after pointing it out. Obviously doesn't bother some people, but it's kind of alarming how many people get seriously flustered because my deck doesn't adhere to their ocd requirements.
>>47148996
>https://youtu.be/SvseDNbzPtM
Latest batch, you can look other vídeos too
>>47134081
>playan
horseshit swingy decks like MUD, Colorless Stax, Soldier/Werewolf/Mogg Stompy - only own complete 75 of Werewolf Stompy, need Wastelands for MUD, Karakas' for Soldier Stompy and Imperial Recruiters for Mogg Stompy in descending order of importance, colorless Stax needs a lot more unfortunately
slowly building towards Demon Stompy but I highly doubt I'll ever own a complete 75 of this because I have no interest in buying Lilys or Chains of Mephs and my interest in Magic is gradually waning
I'm firmly of the opinion that MUD is superior to Memedrazi Stompy
>GP
nah, I'd love to see a Legacy GP in 'Straya but I wouldn't be surprised if I've sold my entire Magic collection by that point
>>47149486
I can actually say the same about old art
>>47149348
Everyone always hates on the card, but every list I see runs it. I think it's slow and doesn't interact well with the deck or sideboard at all.
I just don't get why every list runs it and everyone says it's not a great card. What creature do I replace him with?
>playing
Lands, MUD, Enchantress, ANT, Belcher, plus a few more I can't remember.
>Columbus
Not American.
>>47149596
It really depends on what else is in your list. Flame rift is underplayed
>What deck(s) do you play?
punishing maverick
>Are you going to GP Columbus?
nope hopefully going to prague though
>>47148941
>>47148974
I play D&T specifically because it has game against Brainstorm decks.
>>47141806
Sorry to burst your bubble but original FoW art was for a red card that got cut from the set, not a super-creative take on a counterspell art.
>>47134081
Elves Reporting in. Can't go to Columbus because it's in between some important professional exams I have to take. Planning to go to SCG Woostah in July and probably Eternal Weekend in October though.
>>47147978
Wow, two Spirits? Most people I know only run one. The rest seems like a pretty standard list.
>>47148996
>>47149348
Also, makes your Blazes worse when you don't run fetches.
>>47149606
This pic never ceases to make me smile
>>47150076
True, but the working title was Stop Spell, which seems counterspell-ish to me. Perhaps meant to be a red counter, so the art is still fitting for a counterspell.
>>47134877
/tg/ is full of poor gags who bitch about card prices as well as netdecking scrubs who have little to no understanding of card power or metas besides looking up the most recent top8. As far as MtG goes, this board is awful for everything except flavor discussions.
>>47150363
Truth, although there's really very little quality Legacy discussion online anywhere. The Source is a cesspool and leddit is mostly modern players asking what to buy.
>>47134081
>As always, counterfeit users are not welcome here.™
Why?
>>47150427
Because we don't need poorfag neets shitting up our tournaments.
>>47134309
Thats how I got my Modern, legacy, and vintage decks.
Its amazing how many dorks leave thier shit unattended. Leaving full folders on the floor lol. None of these shitty stores have cameras or anything lol.
I just lied about all that but it's crossed my mind once or twice. Damn this dumbass expensive hobby.
unban Hermit Druid please
>>47150444
>Legacy
>Tournaments
Kikkity kek. To kick out counterfeit users is to divide legacy players on /tg/ even more, and as a dying format you can't afford to do that.
>>47150464
>dying format
This is what poorfags actually tell themselves to feel better about not being able to play.
>>47150472
You keep telling yourself that because you don't want to feel bad about your purchase
>>47150472
My purchase worked out pretty well, I play a full Legacy FNM every friday and a capped 1k once a month.
>>47150363
>I hate people who netdeck cuz they beat my janky tier shit hombrew
>>47150681
>not being able to win with brews
only competent players should be playing brews
>>47150561
I play a weekly and a quarterly, and never have to deal with standard kids or modern neckbeards
I'm trying to decide how to into legacy, what are you opinions on
-MUD
-Imperial Painter
-LED Dredge
Right now I'm leaning really heavily towards MUD.
>>47151696
Just proxy first to see if you like how the deck plays, that way you won't regret buying into something you ultimately might not like as much as you thought you did.
>>47151696
MUD is a pretty cool deck with a lot of interesting options. If you want to have a good deck for the current metagame, Painter might be the better choice. Dredge is always playable, but it can be pretty frustrating to see graveyard hate.
Playtest them on Cockatrice first. Legacy is about fun and practice, and if you don't enjoy the deck you shouldn't be playing it.
>>47151837
I already took that step, and I'm having a great time with MUD. However, I'm also really enjoying Imperial Painter due to the nature of the combo; and LED Dredge is just so good.
Deck paralysis sucks.
>>47149606
Mein negro
>playing
Lands, Enchantress, Parfait, Omni-Tell
>>47151892
Painter has the highest room for levying play skill, that's my recommendation
>>47152080
Valid point, I'll see if Imperial Recruiter gets an Eternal Masters Reprint. That's like 75% of the deck's cost.
>>47151696
i enjoy it
>>47151696
Enchantress or DnT
>>47150561
I play legacy fnm with a proxied deck
>my opponent is playing delver, half foiled
>his deck is probably worth more than my car
>not only am i playing with proxies worth literally nothing, im playing a nondeck, abzan living wish midrange
>i turn 1 chalice on 1, he forces it
>turn 2 i cast another chalice
>he gets visibly upset before saying it resolves
>he won't concede, so it takes me a while to win
>grind out a win in game 2 as well
>mfw people spend thousands of dollars just to lose at magic
>>47152126
>this fucking shit right here
hey well at least there's no karn
>>47152231
I enjoyed using Ugin more.
>>47152203
Uh, why are you proud of the fact that you're cheating at magic?
>>47152268
Ugin is better for the deck anyways because you can -X away all colored threats.
>>47152309
>he thinks the value of legacy cards is legitimate
>>47152309
He's not cheating retard. Just because you spent a lot on your deck doesn't mean he's cheating. It just means you're a dumbass who makes poor life choices.
>>47152309
>cheating
jesus christ are you fucking retarded?
>>47152344
>>47152353
>using proxies at a sanctioned event
>not cheating
w e w
>>47152372
it's not cheating period, it's also not foul play on the store's part if their wpn rep doesn't hear about it :)
>>47152203
Losing to a double chalice draw is something most decks will do. Winning 1 game is not the same as winning every game.
I get pretty tilted when games end with no meaningful decisions being made on either side.
>>47152421
I don't really understand why so many people are willing to shell out huge sums of money to build and play these boring control decks.
>>47152417
Stores get prize support covered by WOTC for running sanctioned events. If they allow proxies in sanctioned events, they lose WPN status and generally go under
>>47152445
would you rather shell out huge sums of money to build and play these dudes-turn-sideways decks?
>>47152470
Yes, at least combat is interactive. Control is solitaire light.
>>47152502
>this is what green players actually believe
Alright folks I have been playing loam Pox for a year now and I want to expand. Planning to invest into punishing loam and lands. Both require lots of the same cards and both are in the same price range. Question is which one do I buy first?
>>47152470
Some people enjoy slamming a card and seeing if the games over on turn 1. I don't fault them, but I prefer playing decks where your games offer you the opportunity to outplay someone
>>47152512
I have a friend that get mad at me for playing Pox and he insists his elf deck is "interactive" and says it's an aggro deck before combo.
>>47152516
Buy a tabernacle with your tax return
>>47152512
Yeah dude, just play Statis. Your friends will have a great time. I mean, why not? Any control deck is just the same principle watered down. "Oh, you wanna' play your cards? No! Isn't this fun?"
>>47152549
It can be, depending on the build
>>47152421
I mean I definitely can't win vs delver over 50% of the time with this particular deck, that is for sure
>I get pretty tilted when games end with no meaningful decisions being made on either side.
legacy might be the wrong format for you
>>47152564
See that's the problem. I don't know if it's a big cripple buying lands without tabernacle or if it stills runs good like Pox does without it. I was thinking of punishing loam because no tabernacle. Wut do? Any experiences playing lands with out tabernacle?
>>47152606
>he can't deal with control
>he can't spell Stasis
maybe you should go back to modern with the rest of the failed abortions LOL
>>47152463
.... yes
that's why i said, it's fine so long as our wpn rep doesn't hear about it. which they won't.
>>47152672
Oh no, a typo!
What kind of person are you? Do you look at a card like Chalice of the Void and think to yourself, "Wow, this looks like a fun card. I can't wait to subvert one of the game's fundamental mechanisms. Won't we be having a great time?"
The guiding principle of control players is basically, "Fuck you!"
You don't want me to play my cards. You don't really want to play, you just want to inflict your terrible personality and need for dominance on a victim.
>>47152632
Yeah brainstorm isn't a decision intensive card at all
>>47152728
I'm sure your store is ok with maybe going out if business.
>>47143537
I own Reanimator, Storm, Merfolk, RUG Delver, Dredge, and Enchantress. I've played on camera at SCG opens.
Nothing like getting told you're bad when most of the posters here can't put together an entire list.
>>47152791
>waaaaa stop playing the way you want to play
are you so bad you don't know how to beat control?
>>47152645
It's honestly not very good, man. Glacial chasm can work, but Tabby is absolutely crippling to aggro early game.
>>47152791
>assmad casual player sees Chalice and has flashbacks to that time his friend's older brother played his 30counters.dec against his craw wurm tribal
>>47152859
Punishing loam it is.
>>47152606
>playing competitive Legacy for fun
I've got some bad news for you.
>>47152645
Lands is a lot worse without tabby. I won't say unplayable, but certainly a lot less powerful.
Oh shit son I quoted the wrong post.
>>47152803
Was meant for
>>47150681
>>47152800
the only thing that is going out of business is paper legacy, lmao
>>47146669
i might add one in the sb, maybe replace the serenity for it, or maybe something else. My local meta is mostly combo, elves (lord help me), and delver variants, so prison/taxing effects have always had to be my main focus
>>47152800
>keep the good cards
>put away the bad ones
WOW so difficult
>>47135644
Because there are far better forums for discussing the format? MtG in general, too.
>>47153006
Why are you even in this thread if you don't play legacy?
>>47153038
I am here to make fun of you.
>>47152203
>Proxy tournaments
That's nice of your local homeless shelter to get DCI-Sanctioned for all the street kiddies.
>>47153006
you forgot
>pop a fetch to shuffle
>>47153093
yes yes, that's the "put away" in "put away the bad ones"
>>47153038
I do play legacy
>>47153077
they're not sanctioned, I'm not that guy talking about the WPN or whatever
proxy tournaments are great though, basically the only medium in which this format is alive other than modo
>>47134081
>tfw i have this card
>>47148941
Cant speak for everything, but I personally have always just loved the whole idea of the deck: making it harder or even impossible for your opponents to cast (not even resolve, but CAST) while not-so-slowly beating them down with a bunch of "underdog" creatures.
And after sideboarding, you can go full toolbox with enlightened tutor for any of a ton of relevant and sometimes game ending cards like
> Spirit of the Labyrinth, Ratchet Bomb, all the CoP, Ethersworn Canonist, Rest in Peace, Serenity, Grafdigger's Cage, Phyrexian Revoker, ect
All in all, its a fun deck that rewards players with knowledge of both the metagame and all of the many interactions in your own deck
>>47148941
dnt is for contrarian faggot poorfags who don't actually even want to play legacy. they think they can build their sub 1k deck and win, but the secret is that dnt is actually shit and can't beat a competent player on a blue deck.
>>47153038
Because people feed the trolls
>>47152946
My opinion on the matter is that netdecking is a good place to start, but if you go to a tournament and don't know what cards are in your deck, you're a bad player.
>>47152372
>If you don't pay the same as i paid for my game you are cheating
>>47152203
You lost the second you revealed a counterfeit card.
>he cheats at Magic
>he still loses
>>47152502
>Yes, at least combat is interactive. Control is solitaire light.
Control is the epitome of interactiveness
>>47153931
i lost? guess that's why i won first place and got $30 in store credit eh?
i feel like you're channeling that delver players' butthurt. what's the matter, have you also lost to a proxied deck with your thousand dollar pile because you're not actually good at the game?
>>47150316
my meta is filled with blue decks, they enjoy their removal as well. this list has done me pretty well so far. i won 2/3 local tourneys i went to.
one getting wrecked by omnitell, painter, and a bad draw against miracles.
>>47137433
Does anyone know where can sleeves like these, where the border graphics on the front side of the sleeve, be found?
>>47153152
i feel the deck has a good chance to win tournaments as long as you play smart.
>>47148941
i enjoy playing it cause it's control, and i get to beat down and have some fun with card interactions. plus its a cheaper yet still very viable legacy deck.
>>47153125
>FNM
>not sanctioned
Choose one.
On another note, proxy tournaments are good and healthy for the format, since shit ain't getting reprinted... until summer.
>>47155663
>stores aren't allowed to host magic events on friday unless they are sanctioned
are you actually, unironically retarded
>>47155707
Sorry, I guess I'm mistaken. At our LGS, FNM = sanctioned play, either limited or constructed. Nobody comes around to play casually on fridays.
>>47154136
I think you're talking about KMC roses.
>>47154091
>thousand dollar pile
What Legacy deck is only $1000? Is that how much you sent to a shoddy Chinese printer for your counterfeit cards? Such savings!
>>47154091
Only lost a single game to a kid citing/abusing a certain Competitive REL in a casual game prior to its inception so when he said something was "gay" he lost the third. He was also an EDH cheater, using counterfeit cards from his inkjet.
>what deck(s) do you play
Port/Waste decks, full foiled/fbb;
DnT, Goblins, Imperial Taxes and also Grixis Delver when I get sick of t1 combo decks ruining my fun. Also Slivers because that deck is so bad but also so fun.
>are you going to gp columbus
no because ausfag :(
>>47153152
I always play Vendilion Clique decks, and clique/spirit is a great interaction.
Clique/ notion thief is better, but I've only ever gotten that off a lotus
>>47159300
1/10 obvious troll is obvious
>>47153003
Wickerflisp's a cunt.
Quick /tg/, what would be the best chaos draft with everyone using the same X-Y-Z packs
>>47161667
ABUR/unhinged/homelands
>>47161667
Rise of the Eldrazi / Lorwyn / New Phyrexia
See if anyone manages to draft Twin
>>47161667
RoboMaro/RoboMaro/Unhinged
Is belcher doing well a reaction to the fair decks coming out more
>>47162864
I think it's just getting good draws and opponents (and playing well) for a whole tournament. Belcher can always win a match, but have to be consistently lucky with your starting hand. Once in a while, it happens. Pretty sure there were enough decks with FoW around, but maybe Eldrazi did help to make them fewer.
What amazes me more is the 78 card Elfball deck in the BoM top8.
>>47162864
usually yes. if more people start playing stuff like goblins, dnt etc. no counters or storm. and you can go off before they drop hate/thalia, counter spells etc etc. belcher can wreck in an unprepared meta. same with dredge once grave hate isnt being in the sides. (rare, but it happens)
>>47163720
>78 card Elfball deck in the BoM top8.
link please
>>47163890
http://www.bazaar-of-moxen.com/en/urlrw,40/main-legacy-decklists,c317.html?event=18&evt=18
Pretty interesting top 8 and meta, the BUG list played 4 Thing in the Ice and no goyfs.
>>47163948
The European meta is usually pretty cool. I haven't looked at the storm decklists yet, but the grixis delver list that was first coming out of the swiss was really interesting. I don't like that it added a land and cut the only 3 drop, and the sideboard looked weird (envelop for card availability reasons maybe?)
I like that MD Decays don't leave you cold to chalice or counterbalance. I ran a bunch of games with this today, I think I like the flexibility in your chalice meta
4x Delver
4x Deathrite
3x Young Pyromancer
2x Gurmag Angler
1x Vendilion Clique
4x force
4x daze
2x spell pierce
4x brainstorm
4x ponder
3x gitaxian probe
4x bolt
2x decay
1x dismember
8x blue fetches
2x trop
2x volc
2x usea
4x wasteland
SB:
3 cabal therapy
2 surgical extraction
2 painful truths
1 abrupt decay
1 ancient grudge
1 invasive surgery
1 flusterstorm
1 grim lavamancer
1 forked bolt
1 pithing needle
1 pyroblast
Any ideas for the sideboard? Is Sylvan Library maybe just better than painful truths?
>>47164041
I will definitely pack 1-2 MB Decays just because Chalice kills you otherwise.
I put one Echoing Truth in my board to sweep Empty the Warrens and Marit Lage. I love library, don't have it in my 75 but I'd prefer it to Painful Truths. But then I haven't really played Grixis Delver competitively yet. I want to try Jitte but I'm not sure if it's that useful.
>>47164155
I've been on Grixis exclusively for a couple months. I don't think that equipment is the right direction for the deck. You don't run many threats, and the threats you do run don't need help. I also think Jitte seems very slow: I'd prefer a darkblast or a forked bolt in that slot.
I prefer to proactively stop ETW and Dark Depths. The BOM list had a loam in it, which I at the same time love and hate. The whole BOM list looked built specifically to fuck up eldrazi, miracles and Lands. I usually try to build more balanced sideboards, but I get it.
I also hate the 4th git probe. I think it's easily the worst card in the deck, so I'm trying to run business instead. So far, most of the time the second spell pierce has done a lot of work for me. Cutting the therapies from the main really cemented that for me as the right direction
>>47164223
Will probably use Darkblast instead. I remember losing hard to Jitte on Pyromancer tokens, but I played Goblins and he was on Stoneblade (I think).
I'm using Stifle at the moment, but since I haven't really played a lot I couldn't say whether it's great or if Spell Pierce works better. Next week, I'll play Storm at MKM Frankfurt and hopefully get a good look at the meta for GP Prague.
I still have Therapies mainboard, but they might be bad against Eldrazi. Will probably swap them for the Decays and a Dismember.
>>47163750
Dredge can wreck face even through hate though if the pilot knows what he's doing.
>>47163890
thx
>>47164999
im a moron, thx are for >>47163948
Any Miracles players here? How do you guys feel about the lists floating around that are jamming Nahiri and Emrakul? I tried it in a 4 round side event yesterday at GPNY and it felt kinda sweet, if not just a little clunky. It's definitely a house in the mirror, but I'm not sure if it's worth continued testing.
>>47148941
I like the deck because it has decent matchups across the board, is skill testing, and Aether vial has got to be my favorite card ever.
>>47146669
I cut mangara from my 75 a long time ago. He was just too slow for me. I ended up running a mainboard councils in his place.
What do the other DnT players in here think of SoTL sideboard? Is it still worth running?
not mine, but UNF
>>47168491
>>47169390
that one is called Parfait. It's mono-white combo-control. RIP+Helm oneshot exiles the other guy's deck.
>>47161858
Never stood a chance.
>>47169937
Wasn't being literal, more like: Does someone actually play that in 2016? Given it may steal g1 off dredge and oops but it's overall a worse miracles.
>playing reunimator
>loot an iona and a land into the trash bin
>sneak and show player thinks I just dumped my big dumb and goes for the turn 2 show and tell
>he flips over an emrakul
>I flip over blazing archon
>at that moment I channel my inner pepe and spin it around for him to read
>proceed to draw go for 10 turns until he casts jtms
>I force it
>he forces my force
>I daze his force
>he spell pierces my daze
>I misdirect his spell pierce
>he scoops
>he doesn't say anything but I can tell he mad as fuck
Hnnng
Maverick bros WW@?
DnT bros welcome too since we have similar cards and strategy. I actually played DnT for a long time.
>a pile of shitty green cards with a good matchup against blue decks
THE ABSOLUTE MADMEN
>>47170209
Why would he spell pierce a daze
>>47164328
If you can tutor up a jitte it's great, but the card doesn't flip delver, is very mana intensive and does nothing on an empty board.
I'd probably run therapies in a combo heavy meta, but decays in a fair deck/chalice meta
>>47170459
Because imy dumb and typing too fast. Yes spell pierced my force and forced my daze
Can a burn deck without grim Lavamancer be tier 1.5?
My local stores only hold Legacy night with proxies allowed. No one really has the money for this shit. I'm wondering who exactly is buying expensive cards enough to warrent the costs. In real markets it's supply and demand, but I highly doubt that's the case with MTG cards.
>Even this shit thread has more posts than the Pauper thread.
JUST
>>47171210
>but I highly doubt that's the case with MTG cards.
It's still the case, the important factors are that supply for a lot of cards is never going to increase, but demand hasn't stopped increasing yet.
Today i learned a lesson playing enchantress: don't be too gredy or you can deck out yourself
Should i splash blue for laboratory maniac in case that happens again?
>>47171387
No just don't deck yourself, remember if you play green sun's xenith you can cast it fail to find and always have at least one card in your library.
>>47171210
There's a lot of demand for legacy cards relative to the supply. The market for them tends to be older people, so spending a couple hundred on some cards isn't a big deal, especially when they're collectable
>>47171387
Just run Rip/Helm or Emrakul.
>>47171210
Local college holds full proxied legacy, but some of us alumni like to really build the decks. Local shop has legacy every other week alternate with pauper.I have oops in the same sleeves. Makes the new guys at the college sweat.
Unban Balance
>>47173873
Unban Hermit Druid
>>47173950
Unban Demonic Consultation
>>47174052
Unban Windfall
>>47174134
Unban Gush
>>47174328
Unban Wheel of Fortune
>>47174391
Unban strip mine
>>47174466
Unban Earthcraft
>>47174567
Unban Fastbond
>>47175356
Unban Mind Twist
Unban sol ring
Have any if you folk built those budget Doomsday decks? How good is it? I have a real legacy deck, but something casual for fun wouldn't be bad.
Grixis Delver checking in
>>47166834
I still like losett's lists best
>>47177604
List?
>>47179087
Strongly considering Grixis Delver as a new project, Young Pyromancer seems so much fun.
>>47179087
>>47180563
Is the green splash common nowadays? Not super familiar with the archetype.
Also, what are those tokens?
>>47180578
>>47180563
All lists have at least 1 trop. The most common list runs only 1 trop, then no green spells except maybe one Decay off the board.
Lists with 2 trops and more Decays in the main started getting prevalent when Eldrazi took off. The deck is a bit soft to a Counterbalance and Chalice 1, so having a maindeck way to remove them is good.
The tradeoff is that the deck is less good against combo decks, theres no more room for maindeck Cabal therapy.
The decks really fun to run, and has good game against everything except lands. Its possible to win, but its an uphill battle.
>>47180578
RK Post tokens, I've got some of those classic art tokens that Im going to mix in. I have 3 different Pyromancer decks, so they all need different tokens.
>>47180122
Legends miracles still just seems worse than regular miracles to me. Nahiri miracles seems like its added one dead card to the deck, but Nahiri isn't bad. I'm not sure if its worth having to play bad cards in your deck though
>>47181262
Legends miracles is most definitely worse than regular miracles but I like playing with flash creatures and reusing their effects with karakas. It's morefunto me. Besides my "meta" consists of 3-4 decks.
I haven't seen much about Nahiri miracles tbqh so I won't be able to really give a calculated response.
>>47181296
>>47181262
Also I don't really like Emrakul and Nahiri in miracles because I feel like it fucks with countertop too much
>>47181305
I feel like if you can avoid having blank cards in your deck, you're all the better. Emrakul is a blank card if drawn, I really don't like that
>>47181296
I like the 4 predict 0 win con version of miracles, but that's probably the single worst build.
>>47181346
>I like the 4 predict 0 win con version of miracles, but that's probably the single worst build.
It is the funniest though. People become really mad when you're just durdling away and stopping them from doing anything,
>>47181357
I like terminusing away a snapcaster, then getting to the point where you tap 8 to use your fifth snapcaster of the game to flashback a terminus.
>>47181403
>swing 2
>play snap, flashback terminus so I dont deck myself.
>>47177604
I assume you're talking about sac-land doomsday. It's not great. Super vulnerable to wasteland, and loses easy kills without LED. It's better than straight up sac-land tendrils though since it's more flexible. If you're desperate to play storm in legacy there are worse options but you really should just save up for LEDs.
>>47177604
Fake leds are like 3 bucks
>>47179087
i prefer grixis control, but i also just want an excuse to play fact or fiction.
>>47182925
Am I supposed to trust chinaman with my PayPal address?
>>47184000
Yes
Or buy from aliexpress and don't ask retard questions
>>47184000
>Trust with pp address
Are you genuinely retarded?
>>47183550
... Is there any way to fit Psycatog in that deck?
>>47150453
>tfw military
>tfw never tell anyone my name and no one ever asks
>one of these days I'll just grab some autists binder before I change stations again
>>47186863
>MFW you get blown up by a towelhead
>>47186884
I'm taking your cards downrange with me. I hope they burn alongside my corpse.
>>47187051
you'll be burning for years you fat welfare queen LOL
>>47164041
No Tasigur
>>47187175
The idea of hell brings up an interesting question.
Can jews play red spells on Fridays?
>>47187223
Why would you play tasigur?
>>47187223
angler is better
Ban rip
Ban leyline of the void
Dredge will rise again
>>47190862
So Hitler how have you been?
>>47191373
Woah man, don't compare this cockgobbling faggot to my friend Hitler.
Hitler did nothing wrong.
>>47150459
Unbanoath.
>>47191462
If Hitler were here today you'd know he would build a pimped as fuck dredge deck. Test foils and miscuts and even signatures on his narcs
>>47191852
Of course he would.
But our glorious Fuhrer would never want an environment where he wins without contest!
>He'd just be a good enough pilot to win through hate.
>>47190862
>>47191906
Those cards aren't common, or even the best against dredge. I'd rather have a Deathrite and a Surgical Extraction.
>>47190862
Feeli'n bad you get your ass kicked by girls?
>>47190862
>Ban leyline of the void
You're not even a Dredge player.
>>47186884
Don't get mad. It's your fault for leaving your shit unattended.There's simply no helping the African genes.
>>47192714
I think thats the joke. The guy that keeps posting that bullshit probably cant even tell you what cards are in a Dredge deck
