4 Heroes are
>Sigmarine
>Sigmar Priest
>Human Barbarian
>Dwarf Warrior
Bad guys are all Tzeentch, Screamers and Warriors and that.
It's going to be expensive and probably a black mark on the name of Warhammer Quest
Are we talking Hero Quest or Warhammer Quest?
Because you posted Hero Quest.
>>47129450
>sigmarine
>DURADIN FYRESLAYER
no thanks
i had a lot of fun with warhammerquest back in the day, especially great was the flexible/modular ruleset, which let you include just as much roelplay as you wanted.
>>47129487
>Sigmarine
>Fyreslayer
>Ealf
>Seraphon
>>47129450
>>Sigmarine
Yeah, no.
I want the game because it's Warhammer Quest. I don't want to give GW money because it's fucking Age of Sigmar. What do?
Are Silver Towers from the 40k? I remember them being a flying unit in Epic for chaos (Daemon Engine) don't remember anything about them in WFB.
>>47129450
>Warhammer Quest
>After a gruelling rotting dungeon, dodging traps and slaying Skaven, the undead your brave warriors struggle for days across the countryside, fighting off bandits, disasters before making it back to town where you head into the alehouse before fighting off a Navy press gang you pray at the temple before buying more arrows at the weapon vendor
>Warhammer Quest Silver Tower
>After ascending an impossible tower made of dreams, lies and mystery fighting beings of light and energy you travel across time and space to head back to the God King Sigmar's orbital planetary space station, manned by ancient Star dragons and legions of immortal demi god Sigmarines.
It's... it's just not the same
>>47129680
Don't buy the main game, but buy any expansion packs to it that don't relate to the AoS setting.
>>47129450
I posted in a thread last night, a good friend of mine has a full Warhammer Quest set of every official and unofficial mission set and models, and by models I mean every possible combination of monster you can get he has.
Level 1 - 3 Snotlings and 2 spiders.
or
Level 10 - 5 Bloodletters, 10 Chaos Dwarf Blunderbusses, 1 Great Unclean one, 1 Liche Lord,
I cannot fathom why they did not make this before AOS took over, in the Old World, they'd have made a goddamn fucking fortune.
>>47129909
This is literally He-Man.
>>47129980
What? Is there going to be non AoS expansions? Source?
>>47129954
Yeah I don't like the abstract baubles of reality colliding in the ether of time wierd fantasy setting of AoS at all. I wouldn't like it if it had nothing to do with Warhammer. The fact that they gutted and killed WFB and the Old World to make this pile of shit just adds insult to injury.
>Warhammer Quest Silver Tower
At first I thought it was just OP baitting..
>Google Warhammer Quest Silver Tower
>It's happening
Why, oh fuck why GW??
>>47129680
Buy one of many dungeon crawl board games from other companies
Descent and Dungeon Saga come to mind
>>47131219
>Dungeon Saga
It was more promises than reality. And I have all that came with the kickstarter.
>>47129954
The second one isn't aos, though. I have a feeling that you only know aos from trolls and what you assume is there, not from what you actually read.
>>47130635
>Why, oh fuck why GW??
Why get so rustled over a game?
>>47129909
No female heroes? Not even a token elven ranger?
>>47132008
They already met their diversity quota with the priest.
>>47129909
If you took out the naked dwarf (looks stupid), the sigmarine (completely out of place) and put some clothes on the barbarian, i would be hype as hell. As it is, the Old World died for this abomination
>>47132096
>If you took out the naked dwarf (looks stupid)
Shut the fuck up, Slayers are an adventuring staple in Warhammer.
>>47132096
>remove naked dwarf
>put some clothes on the barbarian
>remove muscle armour man
Feeling insecure hhhmmmmmmmmmmm?
>>47132125
>three foot tall mohawk
>flaming tattoos
>'fyre'slayer
>dumbass micro-spear-axe with a blade too wide to use for anything
>>47132179
Change naked dwarf idiocy, remove the entire concept of sigmarines for ever, and put some clothes on when in a dangerous, cold place full of enemies. Or, y'know, imply implications of homosexuality, thats cool too
>>47132125
>this looks stupid
>shut the fuck up, this has looked stupid for decades!
>>47132207
Oh boy, you really are insecure aren't you?
I don't think Fantasy is the genre for you, almost naked guys play a big role in a lot of it.
>>47132276
>no refutation other than repeating the same point
>which is nothing but 'well, you're sure insecure, arent you!'
go back to shitposting in the /40kgen/ with your mental equals
>>47132294
Oh come on, how can you not see it?
Why do you find naked men so distasteful?
I propose that you're a faggot in denial and so you're forbidden lust awakens and makes you feel uncomfortable.
For straight men half naked guys are no big deal and are a common element in Fantasy.
>>47132253
>This look is iconic to the setting
>CHANGE IT TO SUIT ME
No better than a sjw.
>>47132008
There is a female villain. A Tzeentchian crystal princess
>>47132476
Wrong.
She was in an unrelated story.
>>47132492
Then who was rumor?
>>47131974
Why not? We are on teegee.
>>47132008
GW have no idea what a females are.
>>47132071
>They already met their diversity quota with the priest.
kek
>>47129954
I don't know man, that second one kind of sounds like some Gauntlet game that if made by competent people could be hella hardcore.
>>47132848
>Gauntlet
Now you just triggered my Nostalgia boner man..
>>47132848
The rules set already exists it's just been out of print for 15 years. I'd prefer they not fuck it up.
>>47132253
>this looks stupid
>shut the fuck up, this has looked awesome for decades
Every time they take something from the 80s out of Warhammer or 40k, it becomes a little more bland.
>>47132125
To be fair, Fyreslyers are the abortion of Slayers.
>>47133189
That's not fair at all, visually they are almost identical. In fact they are exactly the same in the one aspect that was being picked on, their nakedness.
>>47129981
The only people who play Warhammer are rich kids who don't have any money concerns. The proper way to exploit them is to encourage them to play 10,000 point Warhammer games. Having a game that would use a tiny number of models is senseless.
>>47132462
It was already made shit in AoS dumbass.
It is an unfunny parody of slayers of old
>>47129680
Buy it second hand off ebay thats what I plan on doing for those Tzeentchagors
>>47133212
slayers wear pants faggot
>>47133413
same, some of the tzeentch models may be good for realm of chaos but fuck knows the game and hero models will be trash tier
>>47133486
>slayers wear pants faggot
Sometimes.
>>47133486
but they wear no hats
>>47133500
I'm worried the tzangores will have all the problems that ruined the new horrors
I'm honestly surprised they haven't tried to cash in on Vermintide and make a warhammer quest out of that
>>47133590
Probobly would have sold quite well and attracted people to the hobby more but gw hates making money, they only like to try to make money
>>47133653
I guess bug business sense is just beyond me
>Tzeentch getting more relevant in 40k as the enemy of the Space Wolves
>Tzeentch getting his own board game (as antags anyway)
IT BEGINS
>>47133815
The gaunt summoner was one of the not aggressively horrific aos minis too so maybe there is hope well get some nice minis
I miss old horrors
>>47133863
>The gaunt summoner was one of the not aggressively horrific aos minis
Oh come on, none of them are horrific.
So which Warhammer Quest: Silver Tower thread is the official one?
>>47132008
OMG, how fucking problematic.
>>47133949
Official
4chan
>Pick One.
>>47133923
>all of the fyreslayers
>archaeon and the varngaurd
>The Dragon riding sigmarines
>ork boars I'm sorry grunttas
Some are pretty bad
>>47133923
You are so wrong it hurts.
The only mini that hasn't been conplete trash is that new orc warboss, and even then he's only good to use as an easy base for mega armor conversions. He's more expensive than Ghazzy though, so I doubt he'll be more popular.
>>47134029
All of those are at very worst okay. You can perhaps point out thing you dislike about them, but none are even bad.
>>47134074
They are "I wouldn't willingly play this tier, esspeciallly at gws price"
>mirrored cad slayers
>visual vomit
>monoposed and deformed
>same
>>47133923
>sigmarines
>mirror dwarfs
>actually every dwarf in AoS
>all the monsters
>aand some khornates
>>47133212
>visually they are almost identical
GW's new art direction has folks that don't understand the older aesthetic and equate it to EXTREEEEEEEEME.
These are the people directing graphics interns.
Yes, it is a problem.
No, "but you're just a grognard" is not a valid counterargument.
>>47134066
>The only mini that hasn't been conplete trash is that new orc warboss
Nah, everything has been at least decent.
>>47134140
>>mirrored cad slayers
They're not even mirrored, they're symmetric, but not that symmetric.
>>visual vomit
A little busy with that scheme.
>>monoposed and deformed
Almost all big kits are monopose, and the model is not deformed.
>>same
Lower jaws aren't great, but over all the models are good.
>>47134198
Sigmarines are down to taste, there is nothing wrong with their sculpts.
Nothing wrong with Khorne stuff or monsters either.
>>47134476
>>47134066
>>47133923
>>47133863
Fuck all of you and your shitty opinions.
>>47134459
>No, "but you're just a grognard" is not a valid counterargument.
How about you're just a retard?
The only thing more extreme looking about the Fyreslayers is that they've got tattoos.
>>47134476
You don't have to support shit.
It's ok. You don't have to tell yourself that the feces you bought for dinner is actually decent. You can just stop buying the feces.
>>47134476
>They're not even mirrored, they're symmetric, but not that symmetric.
Adding a key to one hand doesn't mean it wasn't mirriored in CAD. It just means you knew that your dumbshit boss would notice if you didn't add -something- to make it less obvious that you spent a grand total of thirty minutes on one model.
>>47134509
>The only thing more extreme looking about the Fyreslayers is that they've got tattoos.
The headdress/helmets that are taller than they are, in your opinion, are not ridiculous?
Because the WFB Slayers had big crests, yes, but the model focus was still the dwarf, not the hairdresser or milliner.
Or whatever bastardised profession produces those things.
>>47134561
>Adding a key to one hand doesn't mean it wasn't mirriored in CAD
The fact it's actually not perfectly symmetric does though. It is simply not symmetric enough to be CAD mirror.
>>47134580
>The headdress/helmets that are taller than they are, in your opinion, are not ridiculous?
No, not for a Fantasy setting. Especially not when it's part of a decades long legacy. Slayer have big crests.
>Because the WFB Slayers had big crests, yes, but the model focus was still the dwarf
Hardly, Fantasy slayers were mostly their hair and their beard.
>>47134615
They literally are perfectly symmetric with a few details slapped on top
>>47129680
Get older Warhammer Quests?
>>47134675
Do you just have a shit eye?
Because they're not.
>>47134459
This. It doesn't feel like Warhammer anymore, and that's someone who's been buying Citadel miniatures since the 80s.
>>47129534
gotta squeeze all those copyright enforced names in there somehow
>>47129909
i dunno, the barbarian reminds me of this guy
>>47134685
Are you serious
>>47134476
I wish i could live off dogfood and tell myself it was "good enough" I would save a ton of money.
>>47135033
Thats about as symmetrical as it comes, minus the axe and key, done to save face.
>>47134685
BTFO
T
F
O
>>47129909
Tzaangors?
>>47135033
>Are you serious
>>47135084
>BTFO
Very serious.
You can differences on each side that simple would not be if it were a mirror job. The beard is not an exact mirror, nor are the legs or the eyes amd his crest is slightly off centre.
Is he symmetric looking? Yes. Is he actually mirrored? No.
So how about you actually learn to look instead of meme.
>>47135141
You've never 3d modeled have you
>>47135033
Jesus fuck the beard is *literally* mirrored.
>>47135172
I don't think you have.
If it were the case that they mirrored it, it would be a more perfect mirror.
>>47135213
No, it's really not.
>>47135033
>>47135141
>>47135214
>mirror your model
>pull details around for a little bit to make it ever so slightly asymmetrical
>add some runes and different props in the hands
vs
>model the exact same thing nearly perfectly again
I'll give you hint as to which one of those happened.
It's not the second.
>>47135278
Now if you'll bother too look you'll notice it isn't even exactly mirrored.
>>47135308
Look harder. There are inconsequential differences. Not detail differences that are added after the fact, but to the actual structure of the model. Differences that have no reason to be there other if the model was simply mirrored.
>>47135278
>>47135356
Did I miss any?
>>47135472
His hat is off centre in the no mirrored version.
His eyes are different.
His legs are not perfect mirrors.
>>47135472
oooh your trying SO hard. have a (You)
>>47135588
>>47135599
>It's n-not mirrored
I've never seen AoS people try that one, they really are trying hard to white knight for their shitty game, huh.
>>47135599
One of these is taken from the GW site, the other has been mirrored in MS Paint. I have then omitted all of the non-identical runes, and added the dagger back onto the belt.
Can you tell which one was sculpted and which was mirrored?
>>47135830
The bottom one. That little bit of metal chain on the right is a bit diffrent on the top and the sigil is mirrored.
>>47135830
You mirrored the lower one. I determined this not by looking at the sculpt, but by examining flaws and artifacts in the paint.
See if you can find some unpainted examples and try again.
>>47135900
>>47135830
FUCK THE WEAPONS ARE DIFFERENT.
MK 2 GO
>>47135922
This is another issue. How much mirroring is being covered up by the paintjob? I've seen miniatures with the same sculpt painted very differently and taking on different looks.
>>47135821
It's literally not mirrored though.
>>47135830
Top is sculpted.
>>47135929
Right is sculpted.
Not particularly hard. One is an exact mirror, while the sculpted one has differences, for example in his crest, in his eyes, his moustache and the way he holds one arm slightly higher.
>>47131756
I dunno man... what part isn't AOS ?
>>47135278
DURADINNIDARUD
Not-a-mirror Anon : you're hilarious, mate. I can't even tell if you're a troll anymore!
>B-but, look! There is a difference! Clearly it's not a mirrored miniature!
I bet you think Greg Land's work is not tracing, because clearly he didn't just photoshop the sources, he actually redrew them, right?
>>47137096
>>B-but, look! There is a difference! Clearly it's not a mirrored miniature!
There differences that you would intentionally put on, like the runes.
But there are also differences that you would not intentionally put on, like random beard strands.
It's not mirrored.
>>47137152
This is a special person
>>47137898
Maybe you could just admit defeat with a little grace? Wouldn't that be novel.
>>47137960
Could say the same to you.
>>47138223
You could, but then every time I post it's to counter your arbitrary attacks. I've shown that it's not actually a mirror and you just try to jettison shit at me.
>>47134682
I have the orginal and print outs and proxy minis of all the expansions.
>>47138428
>I've shown that it's not actually a mirror
You must actually be memeing
>>47138918
The term you're looking for is "shilling". He's shilling. He's a panicked GW astroturfer.
>>47140177
I really don't think paid gw shills exist.
I'm pretty sure they are red shirts and fanboys who /doitforfree/
>>47140312
Redshirt checking in. $12 an hour not enough to shill off duty
>>47140351
I think it's more the redshirts who tell themselves that the company they work for isn't clearly going down the shitter who feel the need to white knight for it when people point out said odyssey
>>47140493
Maybe if this was a "career" I'm young and in college. This is just a way to make extra money. I have 2 scholarships which are paying most of my tuition and room & board.
>>47140520
I've seen 40 year old manlet redshirts. That's who I picture.
>>47135830
Top one is real.
Am I right
>>47140711
>>47129909
>>47135085
No really lads, is that what they're turning beastmen into? Because if so I actually really like it.
