Why doesn't your setting have sophisticated, high society Rabbitfolk?
Mostly because it doesn't have any rabbit folk whatsoever.
>>46294738
because I#m not an autistic neckbeard faggot
>>46294738
Because it doesn't have rabbit folk. And if it did they would conform to all the stereotypes of the Irish in the 19th century and would be treated as such. Even orcs would be above them.
>>46294738
It does.They're also turboracist assholes.
Because I like to think my setting has some measure of quality still bouncing around in it somewhere
>>46294738
Rabbit hunters.
>>46294738
It's a cool idea but I go no furrier than Kobolds.
Beastfolk are a slippery slope.
>>46294893
>I go no furrier than Kobolds.
Considering all kobold material regularly circulated over /tg/, rabbitfolk are actually LESS furry now.
>>46294893
>>46294929
Oh, and
>hurr durr, they're no furry, they're scaly, we're better than them!
It's the same exact fucking thing, you degenerates.
>>46294893
They are, but if you just keep them more beastlike than human-like in terms of appearance I think it de-yiffs them a lot.
>>46294946
worse because furries don't have that thing about superiority complex to them
>>46294929
recent events have led to a massive flare up in bunny furbait
>>46294738
Cuz im not a fur fag and if they did live in a world I was DM they would die and befored to act like the animals they are.
>>46295009
to each his own, but take that to f-listModeseven stuff is the best
>>46295017
*be forced
If I start lifting things from Redwall my group will start expecting the pornographic descriptions of meals and then Game Night will be replaced with potluck dinners
>>46295009
So far i have been mercifully spared of this stuff. I'll give it another two months before it becomes unbearable.
>>46294988In my setting i went exactly the opposite way. There is a justification, and the setting isn't exactly the most serious anyway.
Because rabbit folk would be more in common with the workin poor because of their massive reproduction rate and tendency to screw everything that moves.
>>46295074
>my group will start expecting the pornographic descriptions of meals
>Year of our Lord 2016
>Not doing pornographic descriptions of meals
Get with the times, gramps.
Because anything related to rabbitfolk has the same "that guy" aura about them that kobolds and (to a safer extent) elves have. It's a shame too cause I kinda want to try making a world where all races are just different animal heads on human bodies with their own cliched cultures. This is my punishment for letting furfags into my tabletop group.
>>46294738
It does have rabbitfolk. They're slightly below human intelligence, are incapable of feeling pain, and have very short life expectancy. A good chunk of that is a result of injuries from stabbings or gunshots that get infected due to going unnoticed, but even in ideal conditions they wont live far beyond 30. They're called lagomorphs in some areas and walker rabbits in others, but it's a misnomer, they're not related to rabbits at all, but their appearance and diet is very reminiscent of one.
An oddity about them is that they can only reproduce with their own breed. This results in emigration or celibacy being a controversial issue among them as it can result in specific breeds going extinct or becoming endangered.
>>46295074
>getting way into comfy details like food
>players bringing homemade food to games
I fucking wish my players would get that comfy. At best one brings chips and lemonade and so far despite my attempts to interest them in cooking and other luxuries via descriptions and minor morale bonuses they insist on living off hardtack in bedrolls. It took one player three games to remember his three-letter name. Holy shit end my life.
>>46294738
'Cos fook ain' self-'spectin' sort wanna give two rat-cocks a' bain'a high-falutin' pisswater ruffleneck Inna firs' place, mate? Alla'em types, suppin' onner own wattery nightsoil an' callin' it Ea's own teat-cream, while us honest sorts is down 'ere, keepin' 'is High'n'Firstly's city chuggin' along in the see an' small.
Nah, fuggem all, the whole lotta ostriches. They gots the titles, but we got the power, aye?
(Basically, OP, a race of lagomorphs like Pic Related populate the slums, the near-slave 'black crew' workforce that keeps the whole city actually functioning while the higher classes go about their everyday lives. So fuck yeah, rabbitfolk engineers.)
>>46295311
You. I like you.
>>46295311
>lagomorph
Stop that.
>>46295287
May I interest you in this article?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scurvy
>>46294738
Because I'm not a furry and I only include beastfolk in my setting when I want something bestial and antagonistic.
Dressing up anthropomorphic animals like posh nobles and treating them like humans doesn't serve any purpose in a setting besides stroking your gay furry boner.
>>46295425
I'm sorry, is using the correct taxonomic term somehow a problem? If they were birdfolk I would've called them avians, if they were dogfolk it would've been canines. Something wrong with my word choice, eh?
>>46295425
Who's that brawny man?
>>46295522
Only furries get that autistic about their fictional animal people terms.
You're bascially announcing to everyone that you masturbate to cartoon rabbits.
>>46295576
All veterinarians and biologists confirmed for massive furfags. My mind has been opened.
>>46295576
You're the autistic one mate, making a song and dance about someone saying "lagomorph". Using terms like that is common when naming or describing fantastical races based on animals.
I have no idea why people are adamant to not having best races because "it's furry."
For fucks sake, are you really so worried that you'll become a furry for simply having a beast race? As if the GM is casting some dark spell by adding anthro rabbits?
>>46295576
Or he just knows the taxonomic terms for rabbits and hares?
>>46295592
That's an entirely separate context you gay animalfucker, I even specified fictional animal people expressly for you but you went and decided to be dense anyway.
>>46295628
I just like them because I find them neat. Casting them as fey or nature spirits who conform to human, or the mortal races rules is kind of neat.
>>46295639
I said it as well but it took him two people to start being a bitch.
>>46295628
It's just furry-hysteria, much like the pedo-hysteria of the 90s or the casual gamer bogeyman. I remember someone calling Animaniacs "furshit" once.
>>46294738
>Ironclaw second edition art
literally a bait thread
>>46295708
Wait it is? I have never even looked at Ironclaw, I just know it exists. Good to know though.
I'm not a raging faggot
>>46295628
It's not because I'm worried I'll become a furry, it's because I'm not one.
I don't feel any compulsion to include animal people in my games beyond the few types I think are cool, like porcs or werewolves.
>>46295646
>That's an entirely separate context you gay animalfucker,
But not separate knowledge.
>>46294738
I don't like animal-people in settings. With rare exceptions, they don't do it for me, and the le furry meme has a way of asserting itself in games.
>>46295200
>are incapable of feeling pain
fucking why
>>46295816
agreed. My setting doesn't have dragonborn really. It's not that I feel repelled by them, I just don't see a need for them. Same for rabbitfolk, eladrin (elf 2.0) aasimir, catfolk, most folk, and the moon.
I will take a furfag over an anti-furfag any day of the week however.
>>46296069
What need do you see in regular elves/dwarves/haflings/etc?
>>46295465
On one hand I really want to do this. On the other, if my friends absolutely can't get my friends to like comfy settings I probably shouldn't force it. I'll let my preferences take the back seat for now and if they seem to be losing interest in downtime planning I'll see what I can do again. Good idea though.
>>46295736
Ironclaw 2 had pretty cute art.
>>46294738
Because they would be annihilated by the unlikely alliance of the sophisticated high society Necromancer Romans/frenchmen who are protective of their stylistic niche, and the Jewish Mongol Gnolls who simply find them delicious.
>>46295576
...So wait.
You're telling me, on a public image board dealing with a hobby where people are routinely called out for dressing up as elves, carries, wood sprites, walking trees, trolls, dragons, goblins and a nonillion other possible beings in order to go off into the woods to bash on each other with foam padded weapons and perform bad improvisational theater for their own entertainment;
Where people will argue for literally months on end over whether one fictional being from one fictional universe, if properly adjusted to fit within the rules of physics for a second fictional universe, would be able to overpower a second fictional being from a third fictional universe, and whether it is the second universe's set of physics-rules which are at fault for that failure;
Where we will spend hundreds, even thousands of dollars to purchase hundreds of tiny, unpainted figurines and the materials to in turn labor for weeks, months in meticulously detailing every little emblem and mark in painful exactness, only to turn around and scrap the entire set a few months to a year or so later when a new update comes out;
And finally, where we have actually taken the time to not only mathematically calculate how many spider-sized objects can fit into a female drow's vagina, but have done so not in the name of perversion but in sheer bloody-minded scientific curiosity;
With all this, you are honestly asserting the only possible reason a person could be so concerned over a piece of terminology is fetish-related?
Good god, anon, I wish I was that easily turned on that anthropomorphic animals did it for me.
>>46295017
>>46295060
*Because *I'm *furfag *DMing
>>46295576
>making a witch hunt out of furries to look normal
Because beastfolk are non intelligent, and nearly extinct in my setting.
>>46296093
other then variety (cause that's important but not enough reason for a race to have a major presence)
descendants of genetically engineered humans for various purposes
Halfings- small, friendly. less resources, less social strife
Dwarves- sturdy workhorses
Hobgoblins- Soldiers
Elves- humans changed by magic over many generations
Orcs- Angrier soldiers
Kobolds- I confess I just really like Kobolds
Now if a palyer wants to play a rabbitfolk or something, I'd probably say yes as long as it isn't op, but they won't be a major race.
>>46296093
This is a good question actually, if the stories that had spawned modern fantasy had Rabbits and Deers and Badgers and Goats instead of like, Dwarves and Elves and shit, would the tables be turned? Would the guy bringing an elf to the table be yelled at for making an "Oh so perfect women waifu herpderp" or the guy trying to play a Dwarf get debated at for why a Dwarf wouldn't work or make sense?
>>46296325
>a Dwarf wouldn't work
Bitch. Dwarves work twice as hard as the average human.
There is not a single dwarf on /jp/, because dwarves would never embrace truNEETdom.
My Rabbitfolk live on the moon, nippon-style.
>>46296403
>There is not a single dwarf on /jp/, because dwarves would never embrace truNEETdom.
I feel like that's a contradiction, though. The reason Japanese NEETs are so famous over there is because they have a culture that emphasizes work heavily just like the elves, so if your comparison is apt there would actually be loads of NEET dwarves posting on 2chân or whatever the fuck about those pretty tapestries the elves made
>>46296465
They live about the 'mundane' earth and see themselves as upperclass society.
>>46296325
So Redwall coming around some decades earlier, then?
Although perhaps that has more roots in fables and fairy tales, which are filled with animals that are anthropomorphized to varying degrees.
>>46296403
I take it you haven't played Dwarf Fortress?
Those lazy bums need to stop dancing in the pub and get back to work.
>>46296497
NEETs are famous?
I wasn't aware of that. Most every Japanese works hard, and the guys who collect sexy figmas even more so because those are expensive as hell.
>>46296403
I mean like mechanically/biologically, Not actually work ethic wise. My bad for not explaining.
>>46296497
"Channel" is "Catten" in DF Dwarvish, at least, so perhaps 2cat?
I swear to God that I didn't make that pun on purpose, I only realized it as I typed it out.
>>46296525
Perhaps "infamous" is a better word. Every culture has freeloaders, it's just that you don't hear that much about them on account of them not accomplishing much.
>>46295708
Ironclaw is a solid system, mechanics are consistent and will stand its own against vast majority of "mainstream" P&P RPGs.
>>46296610
>Every culture has freeloaders, it's just that you don't hear that much about them on account of them not accomplishing much.
Anon pls, I'm europoor and our "cultural" freeloaders get mention in news pretty much every day.
>>46295078
Explain your Rabbitfolk further
>>46295192
Bruh, all you gotta do is blame Google. Just say you wanted to try something, anything different, and decided to roll with it, literally. Just chucked some dice or let a fancy Excel formula pick from a list, then run with it.
>>46295200
How'd they come to be?
>>46296253
Why is that, homiesaurus?
>>46296498
Seems like they're set up for a fall.
>>46294738
>Sophisticated, high society rabbitfolk
Mine live in a heavily mountainous region which is fundamentally ungovernable beyond the local level and spend all their free time practicing martial arts and fucking. Sometimes at the same time.
Not high society, but fairly Lugaru.
>>46294738
I'm not into beast folk, they're either furry bait or just a lazy way to create new races. If I did have rabbitfolk though, they'd be based on Max from Sam & Max Hit the Road.
>>46295592
Did you really think they weren't?
>>46296193
underrated post
>>46296610
>"Channel" is "Catten" in DF Dwarvish, at least, so perhaps 2cat?
Is that a pun? I mean, it has "cat" in it I guess
>>46297055
What led to that and how many other races do you have?
>>46294827
Why does this work so well?
>>46297520
They got their asses kicked and ran away.
Not many races, actually. There used to be a lot more, since every Fae who wanted a shot at power made his own species to act as minions, but most of them died out within a couple hundred years when their boss picked a fight with the wrong guy.
The bunnies were actually an experiment who got abandoned. One of the Fae was seeing about taking herbivore species and turning them into soldiers, with the idea being that not only would they be easier to feed, bloodthirsty instincts wouldn't be at risk of taking control. Fae, as a rule, can't actually create anything new; they aren't powerful enough. They had to work with what was already there, so you got a lot of animal people.
His conclusion with the bunnies was that they worked best without guidance. He left them with some basic military knowledge (since this particular Fae was trying to cultivate a reputation of not being a total dick) and buggered off to try and establish an underwater empire with carp.
>>46296193
How many spider-shaped objects CAN fit, then?
I'm adding in rabbit folk, but also a few others like badgers, weasels/ferrets, and maybe squirrels too. But I want them to all be in the same general race or grouping, I don't like adding in too many unnecessary races.
Because they've permanently replaced halflings in my D&D games instead.
>>46294738
Because beastfolk are all tribal and shit.
While the rest of the world is high society the rabbitfolk still eat their young/shit and die from stress 24/7.
Most common cause of death? Running away so fast that they snap their own necks.
>>46297608
Because two of the main American stereotypes of Irish in the 19th century was that they lived in dark, squalorous places and reproduced ceaselessly.
>>46294738
Because my rabitfolk are more focused on shooting down intruders (including other rabbits) than having manners or codes. Being cowardly but numerous creatures they have no course of survival than being aggressive and throwing themselves at their numerous enemies in great mass.
>>46298623
Sounds like Redwall.
>>46298916
>Irish
>minor family get-togethers number ~25
>reunions require careful coordination, nametags, and catering
>have blankets over the windows to keep the sun out
God fucking damn it, I'm a racist sterotype.
>>46298968
Are there other beastfolk? Is it a world war or the like?
>>46297724
>How many spider-shaped objects CAN fit, then?
Approximately 134 spiders (or spider-sized, spider-shaped objects) if we're using only the vagina, roughly 356 if we include the uterus as well, and around 8,300 for a fully inflated, pseudo-pregnant drow matron.
Again, all figures are only rough estimates, as the exact dimensions and volumes of the average drow matron vagina, uterus and womb in comparison to a human female's have not been canonically set out.
>>46299079
Either that or a prolific vampire.
You know, its kinda weird how rarely you hear about a vampire that still has the racist views of the age he grew up in, even if he's been asleep for centuries.
>>46295576
Or he's just played Sam and Max games.
>>46299131
If they're evil, I just mentally adjust them as treating humans as being so far beneath them that its not worth considering (sure, a bullet ant hurts more than a fire ant, but as long as they're not swarming you still just squish them.
If they're good and aren't given a philosophical basis for not indulging in that sort of thing (IE; having converted to buddhism), I peg it as lazy writing.
>>46294738
Rabbit's meat is as tasty as cat's one.
>>46299222
That rabbit looks like its going to unbirth them.
>space setting
>space rabbitfolk, mixed with dwarves
>not very welcome of outsiders, constrained to a few dozen system tops
>love of heavy armor, ships are heavily armored and shielded and power armor is common among ground troops
>the above resulting out of being repeatedly hunted by other species
>the clan fighting didn't help eitheractually aren't rabbitfolk and are more comparable to space mimigas in appearance
>>46299370
So are there still other space empires who want to eat them?
Is in Engglesh a proverb "to fuck like rabbit"?
>>46299466
If I were to make a proper setting out of the random ideas that pop up in my head and linger for years, yes.
>>46299486
Sorta. "To fuck like rabbits" is the saying.
>>46299098
>Other beastfolk
Plenty. We have the standard array of cats, wolves, and foxes in addition to rabbits, penguins, lemurs, and crocodiles. There are also humans, shape-shifting gene-splicing hivemind blobs, and coalition of various alien species. The current setting is scattered across several solar systems where an uneasy peace has been stewing after a series of proxy wars that lasted nearly a century between the two largest superpowers. I've been developing the setting and mechanics recently.
I made this setting ages ago, back when I was in elementary school. Inspired by the antics of Zoo Tycoon (where penguins could beat down fully grown zebras in a fight due to a glitch) I created a setting with several of my friends with a series of animals creating civilizations on earth in remote areas. Over the years I refined it, made dozens of non-operational games, and finally built one that worked. In high school I made a working RPG hybridized of Mount&Blade, D&D, and several other random RPGs. Then I went to college, roomed with a furry, and now I'm in over my head. I hate so much of this stupid fandom, but every so often I find something that I like and it makes me feel sick.
Here's the fun things about furries, some of us start out innocent enough. Then eventually we find that the internet community that has similar interests. This leads to an internal crisis when we come to find the truth that nearly everyone online with an interest with anthropomorphics has a bit of a problem.
>>46299131
What does a vampire care for the labels the cattle place on themselves? The only reason a vampire has to be racist is that certain blood tastes better or worse than others.
>>46294738
Only the most sophisticated, highest society variant.
>>46295592
It took you this long to realize that?
>>46294738
I like cartoonish, borderline silly beastfolk races. Probably because I grew up in the early 90s and half (or more) of the cartoons I watched featured these kind of characters. Ducktales, Ren & Stimpy, Tiny Toons, Samurai Pizza Cats, SatAM Sonic. Hell, I even read the Archie comics series for that one. The list could go on and on.
What I cannot stand the realistic animal heads on human bodies thing. Not to knock anyone else's taste, but that shit makes my stomach turn. I find it weird and out of place and I avoid it like the damned plague.
>>46300240
Your taste is shit.
The first picture is clearly superior and has less of a furry vibe due to its less-cartoonish quality.
>>46300435
Nah. Literal rabbit's head swapped lacks style and panache. It's just the head of an animal on a human body. It looks terrible and quite frankly is just lazy design.
Look at that face: Where's the character? Where's the life? It looks like something a bored taxidermist would shit out and call art.
But hey, you're entitled to your opinion. Lets agree to disagree and you can take your soulless rabbit headed mannequin and have yourselves a ball. Oh and if crying furry makes you feel better about your garbage taste, I'm glad you've found something that helps.
>>46298968
>>46299997
>The current setting is scattered across several solar systems where an uneasy peace has been stewing after a series of proxy wars that lasted nearly a century between the two largest superpowers
... this sounds like Albedo. Minus the humans and aliens. It was strictly focused on the political rather than it being a backdrop.
>>46300845
And the right looks hella generic
>>46300435
>>46300845
>>46303324
What both of you need to consider is a tasteful mix.
>>46303352
Alternatively, Pookas from Odin Sphere.
With magic being so powerful in the setting, some butthurt magic user turning a powerful country into a bunch of scaredy rabbitfolk would be easy to shove in.
>>46294738
CATFOLK UBER ALLES UNTERMENCH BUNNYPEOPLE GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91usV5DPzSI
>>46303402
I prefer my rabbitfolk less scaredy and more "going to kick your face in if you call it a cute bunny again"
>>46303435
Got ya covered, fampire
>>46294738
Clearly, there's only one source of inspiration you need for a bunny society.
I tried working in a cliff dwelling rabbit species that were specialized jumpers during world creation but the GM hated it.
>>46295576
Something tells me that a certain someone is projecting their closet furriness over a Burmese tapestry site.
>>46294738
Because my settings are good and therefore lack anything-folk, you degenerate.
>he doesn't have militaristic birdfolk
>>46303556
What else did the GM allow?
>>46303660
Standard DnD races, but with switched around cultural aspects. Noble seafaring orcs, magical humans, pious dwarves, savage eastern influenced elves. Shifters were thrown in.
>>46295576
I learned the term from Final Fantasy.
In the original release that's what it was called.
It's called Mysidian Rabbit, now, but in my heart it will always be "god damnit I fucked up the slots again".
>>46299131
When you are an immortal, super-powered guy (or girl) that looks awesome when not looked at through a mirror you have little reason to be racist.
There may be some habitual racist resentments, but over the years they'll wane and die as you just plain lose interest in them.
It's not even that humans are below you. It's that psychologically speaking you have no need to blame others for your failure of a life when you're a success story.
That doesn't mean that racists are failures. It means that it's insecurity that makes people act on racism.
>>46296030
I have no idea.
>>46297000
Evolutionary branch of rodents that gained sapience a few thousand years after humans.
>>46294738
Becauase I'm not a furry fucking fetish faggot
>>46300435
>hating on Usagi Yojimbo
Yeah, us two are through, pick up your stuff and leave.
>>46303402
The Red one looks high as hell.
>>46294738
Because they were probably killed off by the elves.
>>46303607
Fuck, with a picture that inspiring I'm considering having a race of ultra-patriotic eaglefolk.
>>46299222
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umezn9sD2cY
HURRR HURRR HURRR!
>>46306947
>pic related, its their god
>>46300845
>>46303324
>>46303352
Shit taste confirmed. Shittily scrawled cartoons are the reason everyone hates the non-sexual furries as well.
Because foxes are smarter
>>46307024
Hell no - that's their FEARLESS LEADER. Like Father from the movie Equilibrium, 'Samuel' is a role passed down the generations with those outside the inner circle never realizing thanks to the power of body-alteration magic.
No, the Eaglemen worship only one thing, and that is FREEDOM! *cue patriotic muzak*
>>46303534
My Heart has joined the Thousand
One of my friends stopped running today...
>>46307171
>that face
He's giving her the knot
>>46307449
No, he's just got a mean case of resting smug face.
>>46294738
They used to be a proud, militaristic and industrious nation but isolationism and more then a century of peace had led to a massive lack of development and so when the invasion happened at the hands of the Four Courts, they were ill prepared to defend themselves and they found their warrior spirit broken.
Much of their culture is gone now. Nothing more then so many photos in books of exotic lands.
Now they are second class citizens at best in their own lands. Any uprising meets a swift and bloody end.
The once great temple of the Morning Sun, the centre of the rabbit religion, is now a memorial hall, tables piled mountainously high with the skulls of those beheaded. Their life scrimshawed across it, ending with their crime against the four crowns.
A few years ago though, a massive group of dissenters had gathered, raided a military fort that had many of the Royal Navy docked at and after more then a day of bitter fighting, they had stolen half the fleet and sunk those they could not steal.
Since then they raided several ports, focused on crippling the rest of the royal navy and collecting as many of their fellow rabbits as they could before setting off to claim a new land as their own.
Far to the south, where the weather has just started to drift from the tropics, they landed on a landmass missing from all the charts, maps and atlases.
Here they have started anew.
Unfortunately history has a sick sense of humour and now the Rabbits have began to displace the native populous.Alice in Wonderland/Looking Glass setting where the Rabbits are inspired from the Chōjū-jinbutsu-giga scrolls and now our DM is throwing in The Rabbits by John Marsden and Shaun Tan.
It's actually been a rather fun campaign so far even with the heavy-handed 'Colonisation is Bad' message our DM keeps pushing.
>>46294738
Beware the Alien, the Mutant, the Heretic. Ave Imperator.Yes, we're playing Deathwatch.
>>46303430
I hate to break it to you, but that's a dogfolk.
>>46294738
Because it has crazy ass desert-dwelling death cult hunter gatherer Rabbitfolk instead.
One will protect you, the rest will try to kill you.
Choose
>>46308975
Obviously Fran. They gun get fucked up.
>>46308975
I recognise the middle column, Twei and the pokemon.
Who are the rest?
Anyway, I'm going with Officer Judy Hopps of the ZPD.
Not only is she quite a competent police officer, she'll have access to further resources and my status as a Human in the Zootopia universe makes me a curio at the very least which means I'll be getting further protection from other sources.
Or otherwise it'll be Twei just because I'm quite certain she's the most powerful on the list by a massive order of magnitude simply because she's from Touhou.
And thus, the only real choice.
>>46309160
Bunnie, a generic Animal Crossing villager
Sue, Cave Story
Panne, Fire Emblem Awakening
Bonnie, FNAF
>>46294855
I kinda like this idea. Hardcore Nazi Rabbitfolk fascists with a strong emphasis on eugenics.
>>46297000
>Explain your Rabbitfolk further
It's a wuxia game where humanity descended from chinese zodiac (and a bunch of smaller, shittier animal spirits). So everyone looks mostly human with some animal features and bias towards a certain Kung Fu style.
Rabbitfolk are... weird. They don' t have especially strong kung-fu tradition, preferring to overwhelm their opponents with numbers (and boy, do they have numbers), nor they are particularly interested in Wulin, but you can be certain about one thing - if somewhere something is going down, there's always at least one suspicious pair of floppy ears behind that.Courtier arts OP, nerf plz
>>46299486
It's 'to breed like rabbits', meaning 'to reproduce very quickly'.
