>Suddenly /tg/ loves sucking GW dick again.
You guys are tools.
So we should unconditionally hate them despite them now doing exactly what we've been yelling at them to do for years?
>>43609815
>OP is a tsundere cunt
baka senpai
>>43609815
"You're copy will be with you soon?"
I'm not a native English speaker, and I usually can turn a blind eye to typos and shit, but... Damn. Is this even real?
>>43609815
>> FTFY /tg/ loves GW sucking /tg/'s dick.
>>43609873
>GW shipping clone avatars to all their players
Pretty good desu
>>43609873
Given GW's record on correct use of the English language, it's certainly plausible. These are the guys who can't figure out that the singular of 'dice' is 'die', after all.
>>43609815
>Geedubya referring to their customers' reactions
>Geedubya referring to discontinued products
>Geedubya referring to long-term future plans
>these plans actually sound good
I want to believe, OP, but... I can't.
>>43609815
Well, still waiting for plastic sisters ... But it is a good start.
>>43609815
The salt done to my Sisters of Battle can never be undone OP. Would cast my own models if I had the equipment.
>>43611284
>>43611385
Maybe in another box set? They said Betrayal at Calth was the first of many.
>>43609815
I'd literally take actual shills over the faggots who just spam the board with GW hate. If you hate something, just cut it off entirely. It's not like I waste my own time and everyone else's time by shitting up /v/ and M:tG threads.
>>43609815
Fuck off faggot. I will suck their dicks if they bring back gothic kits.
Resin recasts and ten million dollar PROPAINT cruisers are the worst shit.
New necromunda and blood bowl are also things that I desperately desire.
>>43609815
>caring this much about a company
If the company does something good then yay. If the company does something bad then boo.
That's it.
>>43609815
There's that generalizations again.
>>43609815
>GW Literally Does Everything The Fa/tg/urls Want
>This fucking faggot
>"Muh war on GW!"
Suck a million cocks OP
>>43613583
Holy fuck your dumb and buttflustered
What bullshit is he suppose to cut through, that a company that makes toy soldiers is bringing back old games? Jesus fuck, for someone who seems to dislike GW you sure have a passionate hard on to talk.
>>43612635
>New necromunda and blood bowl are also things that I desperately desire.
With one page rules.
>>43609815
Not everyone. I don't care what they do. I'm done.
>>43612635
I want those things as bad as you do, but let's be realistic here, if you get your hopes up before seeing the final product you're just setting yourself up for bitter disappointment.
GW doing good things is nice in theory, but it remains to be seen if they can actually pull off a specialist games revival without shitting all over everything in the process. New Blood Bowl won't means shit if they ruin everytihng that was good about it in the process, which they have a gift for doing. Given their record for the past decade they don't get the benefit of the doubt anymore.
>>43609815
>you're
>>43609815
>AoS
>not popular
>oh shit, what do we do blokes pip pip crumpet tea
>OPEN THE VAULTS, BEGIN OPERATION GROGNARD
Fucking flies to shit, all of you. They will ruin all of your nostalgia with this remade shit, mark my words.
>>43609815
Try again, there are more than few people seemingly content to continue shitposting about GW. People who can't get their minds around the concept mentioned in >>43612600
>>43617443
This was in the works before AoS, which hasn't even been out long enough to gauge an assessment of.
/tg/ and other sites know jack fucking all about how GW operates and yet continue to pretend like they're experts on the topic.
>>43617543
>shitposting
Yeah, how dare someone dislike GW game-deaign and talk how bad their rules.
>long before AoS
They starts AoS design after 8th ed. first year.
>/tg/ and other sites know jack fucking all about how GW
Then tell us about how they operates redshirt.
>>43609815
>Blood Bowl
Of course they're going to bring it back now that Blood Bowl vidya is a hit.
>Necromunda
For people who want to play Dark Heresy with real miniatures. No other reason.
>Battlefleet Gothic
Since the game is coming out.
This is predictable.
>>43617765
>Blood Bowl vidya is a hit.
>less than 500k sales
>hit
Laughing_Todd.jpg
I simply don't trust GW.
This isn't oldskool GW, it isn't the old gang who made those classic games; pretty much every good, enthusiastic designer has moved the fuck on to create many other games for other companies.
This is the GW that made DreadFleet. This is the GW that made Age of Sigmar.
And it's not as if those old games are even really dead, they still have more active player bases than many new and actively supported games, because they already have a fan-base plus there's a fuckton of models floating about for them; either old models on ebay, proxies or recasts. And the rule books were updated for years so most of them are in a pretty good state mechanically (not like the last print version of Necromunda where they forgot a proofreader).
This ain't worth a bucket of piss as something to be hyped about.
>>43617765
Should be aware that these are only prospects and that what exactly they're going to be working on hasn't been confirmed.
>>43618106
>This is the GW that made DreadFleet. This is the GW that made Age of Sigmar.
No it's not, those are products of the GW Design Studio while these games are going to be headed up by FW.
>>43618134
>while these games are going to be headed up by FW.
Nah it will be new GW division with SOME FW guys, could be second noname team, while rest works on 30k.
>>43618106
>About 6 months ago I learned there had been a major reshuffling of the inner circle of GW. The GW Alan was replaced with the FW Alan in recognition of the ever-increasing sales on his part. GW Alan had been an aggressive proponent of no points in AOS, throwing out the system devised by Jervis. He also prevented the different codex writers from collaborating in order to protect his own ass. Alan Bligh on the other hand, if you've read the 30K books, was a more level-headed and well competent person.
>I predicted massive changes in GW as a result. I can't imagine something bigger than specialist games returning. I'd expect them not to come back to your stores for a while more, as the apparent trigger (Alan Bligh) just came into his own recently. I hope I'm wrong and they come out soon though.
>During Long Night, much of GW's domain was lost to foreigners and heretics. But now Bligh has revealed himself. We embark now on a great crusade to take back what is rightfully ours, what we always deserved but never received
There is still glimpse of hope.
>>43618275
>There is still glimpse of hope.
I will believe it when I see the product.
For now, nothing has changed. The old games still exist, they can still be played, hell they are being played, and they're pretty good (except Inquisitor but that's a whole mess of problems).
>>43609815
I have never hated GW though.
Despite their sometimes questionable business decisions, they are still the best company on this market, with the best overall products.
>>43618521
Yeah that's why their models looks so bulky and clumsy.
>>43618579
>Yeah that's why their models looks so bulky and clumsy.
U wot m8?
>>43609815
But so many other companies have moved into those niches with better rules and models. Why should I play Necromunda when there's better games already? Spartan Games is flourishing in the wake of Epic and BFG.
>>43618612
>>43618579
GW is very capable of making elegant looking minis when needed. You shouldn't confuse a bulky and clumsy looking aesthetic, than spesh muhreens for example have, for lack of ability to do other types of models as well.
>>43618579
The new model designers are garbage. Stormsurge, Centurions, Taurox, etc, all look like fucking garbage.
>>43618683
Agreed kastellan is shit, but harlequins, assassins, magos dominus, skitarii are great.
>>43618612
>>43618634
And now redshirts goes to google infinity, avatars of war, banelegions, ragging heroes.
Also all WHFB releases looks fat, except WE.
>>43609815
>Necromunda
I hadn't read that.
HOLY SHIT NECROMUNDA
WOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOO
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>43618715
Harlequins is just the same as old, but with more stupid poses.
>>43618735
>stupid poses.
I think that you have critically missed the point of the spesh murder clowns.
>>43609815
>You guys are tools
I never understood why people use this term. After I learned what it meant, it seems like the kind of phrase tools would use.
>>43618748
Stupid means clumsy, which try to looks cool.
>>43618780
No, stupid means stupid, you dipshit.
You don't get to redefine words.
>>43611570
Will they also give us new rules/models?
>>43618780
>Stupid means clumsy, which try to looks moe
>>43618805
And here is comes GW 3d sculptor.
>>43618887
Learn to English dude
>>43618887
Is calling everyone who disagrees with you a GW worker the only "argument" you have?
>>43618916
Says the man who trying to use "I love this models, that's why this model looks better tham infinity" as argument.
>>43618952
Except I never said that at all, you stupid fuck.
>>43610759
Anon, it is alltrue
>>43618964
>using DE as example
But at least you imply this.
>>43619021
Maybe in your deranged head. You are the one who brought up Infinity in the first place.
>>43619065
Yep I brought and ty, when redshirts begin spam.how good GW models, while even elves looks more fat than Infinity humans.
>>43619194
Too bad that the animesque aesthetics of Infinity look like total shit.
>>43619194
>a guy posts 2 deldar models.
>WAAH! REDSHIRTS, REDSHIRTS!
Jesus christ how butthurt can you be?
>>43617837
Fallout 4 sold 1.2 million on Steam, so yes 500k sales for a significantly less well-known/hyped game is pretty damn good.
>>43609815
If this makes the Blood Bowl scene more active, I'll suck the entire company dry, yeah.
I was really hoping that with BB2 Cyanide would recognize that Player Customization is key to the game experience, but there's basically none present.
Left me a little bummed that the only practical way to play Blood Bowl lacked such a critical feature.
>>43609831
There is not yet any evidence of these games being in any way, shape or form good.
Until then we should reserve our judgement. Of course the mindless GW drones will not be able to do that.
>>43618134
>No it's not, those are products of the GW Design Studio while these games are going to be headed up by FW.
Same shit, different name.
>>43618275
6 months ago AoS wasn't in stores and its features not public knowledge.
>>43619214
>animesque aesthetics of Infinity look like total shit.
Only if you love muscular male more than female.
Also, infinity have more sci-fi/space opera, than totally anime elements.
>>43619226
>GW: GW models best onarket, look at DR
>Anon: ifinity models have better proportions and detalization
>GW: lol so butthurt
Infinity stuff looks good, but here are my complaints:
- All the studio paintjobs have that same blending/weird tacky colors + olive drab/NMM style. Not really a fault, but their studio style is not to my taste.
- Mono-pose metal
- Expensive price per model
- Game requires a lot of terrain
- Is not as popular as X-Wing/40k/Warma
- Too hard to pick a faction (not really a con either)
- The cheesecake, while I don't dislike, is getting tiresome. And it's all the same huge asses jutting out in bodysuits. Give me some bikinis and titties or something. I am not an assman nor do I have a bodysuit/latex fetish so it doesn't do it for me.
- Stupid little robot animal mascots. Do more mecha/robot/mini-tank minions and mascots.
>>43619683
The fuck are you spouting?
The deldar models were posted because some fucker claimed that all GW models look "bulky and clumsy". Only after that, did some butthurt fag bring infinity up.
>>43619707
$36 monopose plastic clampacks.
Sure they're easier to kitbash than metal, but still.
>>43619735
>mfw Infinifags always cherrypick GW HQs
Try looking at basic infantry or taking average model range prices. Otherwise I might as go "hur dur you pay HOW much for a TAG?",
>>43613871
Not that anon, but I will just be happy if I could get my own mechanicum fleet without having to deal with the bullshit prices from the assholes from ebay, they are worst than GW only because the littleships are oop.
>>43619707
>Mono pose
Still each unit have different models with dofferent poses, unlike warhammer and warmahordes.
>price per model
Still cheaper to play than 1k 40k.
>terrain
Well yes, it,s more interesting than jus move you models forward and throw doces untill you or opponent lose all models.
>>43619766
Yea but he'd counter by comparing a TAG which is in the highest price range for Infinity to any single model over $60 for 40k.
Which is lots of stuff.
>>43619735
That's for special characters and HQ's. Yeah they're expensive but they generally look bad ass and great on the table to boot. You only ever field 1-2 anyways.
You can get 10 Marines for sub 40 bucks. That's less than 4 bucks a model.
>>43619719
>The deldar models were posted because some fucker claimed that all GW models look "bulky and clumsy".
DE models looks good only among space marines.
>>43619766
I don't even like infinity. I just think it's rich that a guy who'll pay $36 for a monopose plastic dude or $4 dollars for a single space marine is gonna complain about a monopose metal dude.
>>43609815
>OP acting like he doesn't love sucking dick.
We got a ruse master over here boys lookout!
>>43619795
It's cheaper to play because Infinity rules favor lower model games.
I mean it's cool it works for you all, but when I saw Infinity played I just thought "where's the armies? All I see is a few dudes?"
>>43619707
>All the studio paintjobs have that same blending/weird tacky colors + olive drab/NMM style. Not really a fault, but their studio style is not to my taste.
Probably because CB only has like one painter.
>The cheesecake, while I don't dislike, is getting tiresome. And it's all the same huge asses jutting out in bodysuits. Give me some bikinis and titties or something. I am not an assman nor do I have a bodysuit/latex fetish so it doesn't do it for me.
CB is a small privately owned company and I believe the person behind such things is one of the founding members, making it easy to get away with.
>>43619836
>I doesn't need gameplay
>I need more dices
>>43619836
The thing is you can play Infinity's rules and use cheaper miniatures or just something that's not even a miniature to save money.
You buy whatever miniatures you like and can afford, who cares which one's "cheaper" that's fucking stupid if you're not buying miniatures you want. Just like people who buy models they don't like to cheese the newest flavor of 40k.
Infinity also takes way more to setup than other skirmishes due to all the terrain you need. And if you want the board to look good? That's even more work since then you gotta have ACTUAL terrain that's painted too, and not just paper walls.
>>43619810
If money is no object, why wouldn't you complain about mono-pose? What does price even have to do with anything?
Let's say I have $1,000 every month that I'm too stupid to put into stocks, so I waste it on toys. Why do I care if something is $36 if it's what I want, over something that's $12 that I don't want?
>>43619851
That's not it.
40k has a very low model count version too called Kill Team. And it's like "We could play kill team with 5-10 models...or we could play a full game with 6 squads and multiple vehicles..."
It's different game play wise. Fielding a squad versus fielding an army are completely different games. Which is why I shake my head every time 40k v. Infinity is brought up because at the core they are insanely different games. It's not about Infinity being bad, it's just Infinity can't offer what 40K offers and kill team will never match Infinity at their game (low model count)
>>43619883
>That's even more work since then you gotta have ACTUAL terrain that's painted too, and not just paper walls.
Nah, it's still cheaper than realmgate or bastion.
>>43619883
A big problem with Warhammer40k is people don't use enough terrain. Warhammer40k SHOULD have as much Terrain as Infinity, but for some reason people just don't get it. I play with almost as much Terrain.
My group plays with actual painted ruins and it's hard not to be able to move 6" and not find cover from *something*. It actually feels wrong when something doesn't get a cover save it happens so rarely.
>>43619894
I never told you that you should be playing Infinity.
If you don't want to buy it, don't.
I just find it funny that you'll complain that one brand has expensive metal monoposes, but your brand which has more expensive plastic monoposes is OK - because it's your preferred brand.
>>43618106
Surely the whole appeal of this news is new minis? If the rules are shit (and I agree, they probably will be) just play with the old rules.
>>43609815
No OP, you're the tool.
Those threads are 60% "this is cool but I'm afraid they'll fuck it up".
>>43610658
Might be more of convenience when death is big part of the game and rules.
>>43619931
>buying GW terrain
Infinity doesn't even have its own terrain. They have to source it to Microarts, who can only make MDF. It's pathetic on both sides, so glass houses.
>>43620184
>I didn't buy GW terrain
>lol infinity is shit because they didn't have their own terrain
Also, it's not so hard to print terrain.
>>43618748
I never realised that guy in the left corner was pic related.
>>43620281
>needing to buy a 3D printer to print terrain
>not just scratchbuilding it
>implying a game that needs tons of terrain doesn't have any terrain ISN'T pathetic
https://youtu.be/4UNAjik9S80
Duncan is doing FW videos now. It's all true.
>>43620659
Holy crap, you are right.
>>43619683
> he unironically thinks GAMES WORKSHOP pays people to go to 4chan to make them sound good
Whew lad, bit worried for you t b h. Face it, random people disagreed with you on a Mongolian hawk hunting chat room.
>>43620686
What is division of labor in a modern economy, for $500, Alex.
Let the people with years of experience and overhead at terrain make terrain, and everyone pays less and makes more money, even the Miniature company since they can only gain more customers when terrain is cheap.
>>43620686
>>needing to buy a 3D printer to print terrain
kek
>>43609815
>FW reworking epic
FAAAAAKEEEE
>>43620686
>>43620960
I have actually printed a few small structures and doodads and the process was pretty smooth.
>>43620988
What the fuck are those big parts for?
>>43621039
The actual warlord of course
>>43621054
I didn't realize that it was that fucking huge.
>>43609873
This is an impromptu poster typed up by a store manager once GW said they could announce it in store. It's not an official official statement.
>>43619795
>Still cheaper to play than 1k 40k.
Only because you use far less minis.
Costing less for less isn't an achievement or praise worthy.
>>43609873
>GW communicating with it's customers ever
>>43618723
I pray for Mordheim.
>>43619950
No, not everything is about miniatures.
Have you tried getting people to play an older version of a game when a new one is available? It's practically impossible as people are conditioned to automatically think newer = better. Very few people have any idea of what makes a game system good or bad, and are more likely to just stop playing than have to re-learn an old version of something.
>>43609815
On wired... Possibly legit?
>>43618723
Don't forget that GW have already fucked up Necromunda once before with the execrable Necromunda Underhive.
Re-release Warhammer Quest and you'll have my attention.
>>43609873
I'm triggered by people saying "your" when they really mean "you're". This.. I feel nothing.
>>43611385
the equipment needed is bathroom silicon, acrylic paint, legos, vaseline and something to cast with like liquid resin or molten tin
>>43609815
Definately don't love GW. A return of specialist games for me if maybe I can find people to play again. I already have a Necromunda Golitah gang painted and ready. I already have a Blood Bowl Dwarf team painted and ready. i already have a Man O War Dwarf Fleet ready. I could go on but like many here you get the idea. I will download the pirated rules books and maybe buy a few used miniatures but I won't be running out and buying the new box set if it is another GW over priced deal which I am sure it will be. You can play GW games and not buy their crap new at retail.
>>43622275
It's from GW itself.
It's definitely legit.
>>43609815
Idk. I hate pretty much everything about GW, but making HH more accessible, and bringing back specialist games is bad?
>>43627238
Yep.
>>43617443
Jeez man, give it a chance before you declare its all garbage. Yes GW are fucked up in a dozen different ways..
But theyre bringing Necromunda back and all you guys can say is that 'its gonna be shit' ?
Lighten up anon.
>>43617765
Youre so eager to be negative that you dont realize everyone can see youre talking out of your ass. Everyone but you that is.
>>43627238
Well, there's a slim hope that GW did run out of shit that was sheduled by Kirby and the new CEO is actually taking the wheel now.
>>43627325
>give it a chance
>5th ed, after all this SMshit: oh come on guys 6th ed. will be better just give it a chance
>6th ed.: just give it a chance, 7th ed will be better
>ET: come on guys, just give it a chance, I am sure AoS will have good rules
>>43618275
Thats the spirit!
I like this post, and I like you. Have a wonderful evening anon.
>>43618275
please let this be true
>>43627375
And what do you know 7th ed was better and AoS does have good rules.
>>43619214
I have MRRF and Corregidor forces, neither looks anime. I also like GW's models. Lifes too short to hate on toys anon.
>>43627526
>And what do you know 7th ed was better
For tau and eldar.
>and AoS does have good rules.
Only if you like "forge narrative".
>>43618717
Those all offer models that are not nearly as customizable, or are not customizable at all.
>>43627375
Im talking about specialist or box games. You are talking about 40k and AoS. They are two very different things.
The latest version of Space Hulk is the best one yet? Why should I assume BFG and Necromunda are going to be shit?
The glass is half full anon.
>>43627714
Not that anon but in these circumstances, they're effectively the same for pointing out GW's recent track record since the old staff moved on.
Which overall is not good.
The glass contains liquid equal to 50% of it's volume.
>>43627714
>They are two very different things.
It's same developers.
>The latest version of Space Hulk is the best one yet?
>last Space Hulk release was just oimited edition of previous edition
>Why should I assume BFG and Necromunda are going to be shit?
Because GW needs money.
>>43627756
>table top ruleset with a 100+ page rulebook
>specialist/boxed game with a dozen page rulebook
>effectively the same
Ok.
>>43627823
>miniature wargame type products GW has produced in recent years.
>incomparable for the sake of showing GW's capabilities to produce decent content
u wot?
>>43627526
>AoS does have good rules
Okay, anon you got me 10/10
>>43627818
>It's same developers.
It's not, but I guess people can't be fucked to do research of their own and learn that the GW Design Studio and FW Design Studio are not the same thing.
And before anyone starts any bullshit about them both likely being subservient to higher ups, said higher ups haven't told FW how to do their job yet and there is no indication they're going to start doing so anytime soon.
>>43627948
AoS has some failings, but it also has some nice stuff as well. You have to look at it on its own merits and realize it's not meant to be similar mechanics wise to Fantasy in any way, shape, or form.
>>43628048
>It's not, but I guess people can't be fucked to do research of their own and learn that the GW Design Studio and FW Design Studio are not the same thing.
FW is now GW division.
>AoS has some failings,
>entire ruleset is totally broken
kek
>nice stuff as well.
Yeah, I love rules for summon spells.
>>43628082
FW was always a fucking division of GW, but that doesn't make it the same thing as the GW/Citadel Design Studio.
GW proper is composed of the GW/Citadel Design Studio, the FW Design Studio, and BL. All of which are mostly autonomous by all accounts.
>>43628245
>FW was always a fucking division of GW,
It was autonomous subdivision, now they will be ubder direct control.
But I'am sure, shiteaters like you will enjoy to see taurox and space marines in space marines in HH.
>>43628245
Just ignore this retard. His reasoning is off, and I suspect hes a bit off himself.
>>43616575
>but let's be realistic here, if you get your hopes up before seeing the final product you're just setting yourself up for bitter disappointment
Look, simply reprinting the rules and making some of the miniatures available again would be enough for me to be excited.
I know they can print good tokens/cards/board pieces
I know the plastic casts are rock solid
The rules.. don't really matter. Everyone uses the (already proven) old/fan-edited shit to begin with.
>>43611284
>mfw plastic Sisters of Sigmar before Sisters of Battle
>>43613871
Who cares, we have rules.
We need models.
>>43628329
>Look, simply reprinting the rules and making some of the miniatures available again would be enough for me to be excited.
>I want to buy overpriced old models in finecast
>I know the plastic casts are rock solid
Fucking kek.
>>43628353
>my religion forbids me to use non-GW models and also I am shitty hobbist
>>43622201
Me too.But I'd better buy Sisters now, because $100 for 20 minis will be cheaper than the new GW ones.
>>43628423
>implying there will be sisters release.
>>43627375
End Times was good, until Khaine.
Nagash was fucking excellent barring the Worfing in lore, and combining the Chaos armies wasn't bad since it fixed Beastmen.
>>43628440
>End Times was good
>I love brainless magespam
>>43628416
Sorry, the ONLY good Sisters proxy models are still months from release and nothing else captures the Cult or Carnival aesthetic properly.
>>43628440
Beastmen was a mistake. Hordes of Chaos shouldn't have been split up.
>>43628469
Warhammer has been Magespam since 5e.
End Times: Nagash did nothing except fix Tomb Kings, the single most underpowered faction in the game, and reduce the need for fuckhuge Core necause money by being able to invest more in lawnmower characters.
>>43628416
Is it really too hard to understand that is someone is playing a game set in the 40k, Fantasy, or BB universe that they may want models which share the aesthetics of those universes? Models do exist which try to capture said aesthetics, but depending on your personal preference they may not be up to par.
>>43628475
This.
Although the best Undead lore came after the split, crunchwise they need to be one faction too.
>>43618275
NEVER DOUBTED FOR A MOMENT
>>43628403
GW has stopped doing new stuff in finecast for a while now. If we get minis they'll be new plastic kits or FWs proper resin.
>>43628889
Recent lizardmen were finecast.
>>43618275
>He also prevented the different codex writers from collaborating in order to protect his own ass
i've been out of the loop with GW stuff for a wee while now, so this is my first time hearing of this and I'm genuinely having trouble comprehending what the fuck I'm reading in that sentence. It's just... how? How on any level does prevent collaborative efforts within the company help anyone?
>>43628986
I am also curious. Last genuine GW news I heard was them telling investors only a small number of customers play games and prepainted minis and vidya are for toy companies rather than model companies.
>>43629034
>model trains
>>43629113
Yeah, the guy who reported it is an economist that attended an investor's meeting and said everything short of calling them retarded monkeys.
>>43628978
Because they were just repacks. GW hasn't produced anything new in Finecast for anything outside of LotR/Hobbit since the 6th Edition Eldar release.
>>43629034
Pretty sure that was an off the cuff comment.
>>43629159
I like how all those neckbeards swarmed said article when the investor who wrote it probably couldn't give two fucks. Also if he really though that low of them I'd imagine he'd have pulled what little money he had invested out.
>>43629417
He didn't invest anything with them. He went to a meeting designed to bring people to invest in it and was shocked by how badly they make decisions and how they bluntly admit they don't do market research. Which is completely ludicrous for any consumer product company.
Did you even read the article?
>>43628978
Those weren't new. They're repackages of finecast of sculpts done in metal originally. GW hasn't done anything new in fincast since the Farsight enclave shoulderpads with the 6e tau codex.
>>43628889
>If we get minis they'll be new plastic kits or FWs proper resin.
Or they just start selling old models in finecast.
>>43628403
>I want to buy overpriced old models in finecast
I want to buy plastic BFG cruisers
I want to be able to point casual friends towards the plastic BB starter
baka desu senpai
>>43632036
>I doesn't need rules, I want throw 3+ to win
>>43631997
It's pretty unlikely. GW has pretty much abandoned finecast much like they abandoned metal a few years ago.
>>43632669
>GW has pretty much abandoned finecast much like they abandoned metal a few years ago.
Seraphon release.
>>43633082
Repackage
>>43618213
>>43618134
FW hosed up every rules attempt to work in the Specialist games, though. Every fucking time.
>>43634910
So?
I quit GW at the beginning of 2014. Various reasons have kept me away.
>Thinning codices with increased prices, actually removing content rather than adding it
>Price hikes
>Time to built and paint and play
>Space to hold the figures
>Rules now being restricted to bundles
>Multiple shit CSM codices
>Copyright nazis
>Age of Sigmar
But this boxed set was ALMOST enough to bring me back in. A few times now I put 2 boxes of Calth into my basket before closing the window down. Amazing offer...
...but then I'd be using them for a shitty codex (Night Lords), I'd then be buying the helmets and shoulders from forge world (too expensive), painting, glueing (too much time), and having to expand the armies. It's just not worth it. Good job though GW on pushing the boundary with more specialist games. You might win me back again.
>>43636105
>>Thinning codices with increased prices, actually removing content rather than adding it
>the page count has gone up and are hardcover
You know, it's already tiresome enough to hear you faggots whine about literally everything, but could you at least whine about actual real issues?
>>43609815
>>43618723
>>43618106
Worst case scenario, there'll be some excellent plastics + terrain to nick and use with old ORB or CE or something.
Like I really don't trust GW with rules for shit as the above anons have said, but some nice plastic Necro or Mordheim would make me hella happy.
>>43636152
page count up = more photos of their display models
Oh look, an anon being a cunt. Colour me impressed
>>43628334
But there is no Sisters of Sigmar in Mortal Realms.
>>43636164
You only need the rules from the codexes. Everything else is just needless filler. Why do you care about it?
>>43636164
>whining CSMfag whining about CSM in a thread not even about 40k
>getting butthurt that people are sick of his butthurt
>double butthurt
>double whining faggotry
>follows up his whine with another whine about people being cunts
Daily reminder that moot was right about EU/AU shitposters. At this point it will be justified if SoB and CSM never get anything good again, just to spite their shitty playerbases.
>>43636196
>says eldarfaggot with OP rules
>>43636196
wow, you sure showed me... in your head
>>43636206
Tiers are for queers. Play by skill, brah.
>>43636164
Considering the prices haven't changed for a few years it's at least a little good.
More of something for $0 extra.
>>43609815
No Gorka-Morka, no sale.
>>43636265
DLC Faction books with little in them
£35 for books where unit entries disappeared because of Chapter House whining
Random tables galore
Formations appearing to make you buy more shit you don't need (pleeeease take a unit of possessed / mandrakes / etc)
Codex becoming obsolete in 24 months
Nah, I look at a Pathfinder book, or a flames of war book for value for money. Not a GW codex.
>>43636216
Go back to whatever shithole board you crawled out of with your crappy image responses.
>>43636348
wow, you sure showed me... in your head
>>43627238
>bringing back
Just have a look at video games to see how well remakes of fan favo(u)rites by comparatively large corporations turn out.
>>43627375
Oh but it will be different this time. GW still loves us. They would never do this to us again. They promised!
>ITT: Extremely butthurt people who feel way to invested in a company try and dissuade people who just want something interesting.
Let me compare GW to any other Model company.
>Overly expensive plastic
Oh look, bottom line is all of them are fucking con artists who have faults, GW is just the biggest.
I know the Anti-GWers find it hard, but people don't need to buy EVERYTHING from GW, we're not FORCED to.
It's just when I want to make an army of fantasy dwarves, the only people who offer a decent range of good models is GW. I use them for DnD, WHFB and just a hobby to paint.
Why are people so fucking angry at GW anyway?
>>43636196
This is the purest concentration of M.A.D. I've seen in quite a long time. If humanity could harness the power of your impotent rage, we could avert a potential energya crisis for about 50 years.
>>43636912
>GW
>interesting
/0
>Why are people so fucking angry at GW anyway?
The same reason why people angry at EA.
>>43637025
>GW models
>No interesting
>Comparing GW to EA.
Are you just that angry Warmachine slav?
>>43637090
>>GW models
>>No interesting
>Taurox
>interesting
>>Comparing GW to EA.
>implying GW is not EA/Activision/Ubisoft clone in wargaming
>Are you just that angry Warmachine slav?
What?
>>43637090
>>Comparing GW to EA.
he's not wrong you know
>>43610074
>FTFY
Fuck off.
>>43637179
Given the recent news that pic isn't so relevant anymore.
>>43637090
>angry Warmachine slav
they're called Khador
>>43637319
Or it might end up the way of Man 'o War -> Dreadfleet. Only time will tell.
>>43637319
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hihEhsdwiIk
>>43637391
Dreadfleet is actually pretty good. As a wargame replacement for man o war it sucks.
But just on its own as a board game its fun. People just expected different.
>>43637440
not for the cost they were asking mate
>>43637440
Minis were nice. Flavor was alright. Rules were way too much on the random side. And I say that as a Mordheim player. Unlucky draws from the damage deck could mean the ship is out of action or crippled beyond all hope in a single round.
I love how GW is bringing back specialist games in order to ride that cashcow that the videogames will bring in, just to probably trash them away in case the games suck
>>43637440
>But just on its own as a board game its fun.
>bad rules = fun
>>43637319
Just remove Necromunda, Epic and BFG.
I don't know anything about infinity rules, how bad would they break if you tried to scale up the number of models on the table?
>>43619933
>Warhammer40k SHOULD have as much Terrain as Infinity
Yeah no, that's going to far. I agree that 40k players tend to use too few terrains, but last time we tried using an infinity table we immediately give up when we realised we couldn't deploy even a chimaera, let alone use it.
>>43618715
I kind of like the kastellans. It has that rocketpunk, war of the worlds sci-fi flair.
>We are the space robots. We have come to protect you from the terrible secret of space.
>>43628473
>proxy models
They're practically fucking recasts.
Hell, the logo is the same and the treasure markers are crystal fragments of the moon fallen to earth.
I'm pleasantly surprised they got away with that.
>>43636179
You are everything wrong with GW's side of this hobby today.
Please die.
>>43628503
>fantasy
>aesthetics
>>43609815
But we're tools with plastic Heresy models for reasonable prices.
>>43638662
>reasonable
>for space marines in space marines
>>43638690
I can't hear you over the sound of all this Maximus.
