Why don't Europoors have the Third-place playoff?
why not handle draft picks from african teams to the worst euro teams
WTF THEY DON'T? I was expecting a Germany-Wales match
>>69349358
>you're the second worst loser congratulations
Because it's actually a serious match
>>69349434
>second worst loser
>>69349434
It's good
1. For the bantz
2. For a nice light-hearted match, unlike the final
3. For the golden shoe dispute
4. To make a little more money
5. For the bantz
have the euros ever done that?
the gold, silver, bronze system is more like an olympic thing. there is only a champion in a championship.
>>69350131
>have the euros ever done that?
They did in 1960-1980
>>69349358
>having two teams of sad loser players play for no trophy in a game nobody cares about
I wonder why
Can't afford it. Did you see all the empty seats today and this whole Euro?
>>69350216
this is objectively wrong, the players are still playing for money, the difference between 3rd and 4th place should be a couple million euro
>>69350181
1984 too, I think
>>69350270
>implying Yuropoors can afford it
They have to spend billions of euros every month on refugees, there is no money for a 3rd place match
South Korea gave themselves fourth-place medals during their own World Cup.
The more you know.
>>69349358
we ain't sugar coating it for losers.
You lose you lose GTFO. None of that feelgoodery here
>congratulations you were the best of the losers!
>>69350475
Then why does the World Cup have it?
>>69349358
Quite a lot of people wants to have it back, but the jews wants a few more shekels sent their way before they allow it.
>>69350517
because the wc is a minor meme tourney open to all kinds of shit teams who are happy to get a pat on the back and a sticker for being losers
>>69350635
>meme tourney
Then what the hell are the Euros?
>>69350635
Look, I know you're still mad about 5pa1n, but you need to let it go.