>Player A scores +4 points
>Player B scores -2 points
>Player B wins
kill yourself
Sounds like OP is a Stableford fag.
The golf scoring system is indeed not very intuitive. Especially with all the random naming.
Tennis has dumb scoring system too.
>>69233066
how? works perfectly fine imo
>>69233142
>arbitary jumps in points
>0 (love) - 15 - 30 - 40 - (deuce) - (advantage)
Why not just call it it 0,1,2,3,deuce, ad?
>Arbitrary number of points/games/sets/matches/tiebreaker points needed to win
>4 points to win game
>6 games to win set
>but 7 points to win set in tiebreaker
>2 or 3 sets to win match
>>69233235
Of course it's insane, it's system from medieval times when every neighboring town had different measurements of pikes, hoes and stones or whatever.
Golf's scoring system makes sense t.bh.
Par is particular number of shots, less than that -ve score more than that +be score. Less shots the better.
>>69233235
>American talking about dumb numeric systems
>>69233401
yeah but three in switzerland is still equal to three in france
