Which US state produces the best athletes?
Texas 2 b h
depends on the sport
California & Texas. This is debatable given the Olympic medal count, but as far as breeding athletes for our sports, as in American football, Baseball, and Basketball, it's those two.
>>69223363
Really? but that's a hick state
>>69223317
wyoming
California
California
Followed by Texas or maybe Florida.
Sheer population has a lot to do with it. California produces easily the best baseball and basketball. Florida has the best (american) football. Texas has both top tier football and baseball.
For punching above their weight, it would be Pennslyvania or one of the southern atlantic states (Georgia, Virginia, the Carolinas)
Ohio
>>69223433
>hick state
"No"
>>69223317
Minnesota: Brock Lesnar
>>69223433
It has a hick culture but it's one of the largest states
>>69223433
>being this ignorant
Stop listening to the internet.
The states that neglect education and put all their budget into sports.
>>69223317
virginia, specifially the 757 area code, has produced a lot of top athletic talent
>>69223508
This. Pennsylvania is always the dark horse in the race. I say this as a Texan.
>>69223533
Bork is from South Dakota, Fritzel.
>>69223558
>educating your plebs
ISHYGDDT
>>69223508
The Carolinas have produced a lot of good basketball talent, pretty underrated desu
>>69223636
why are the english so shit at sports?
>>69223636
>the literal states of Delaware, North Dakota and Rhode Island
When you are losing to fucking Alaska in medal count its time to secede from the union because you ain't good enough
Really makes you think
>>69223760
That students from other states account for such statistics? Doesn't really make you think.
>>69223703
they're bretty gud at the sports they invent though!
>>69223317
Jew York/Commiefornia
>>69223724
Losing to Wyoming is more embarrassing, desu.
Only valid stats would be the place of birth of Olympic athletes, not universities, because athletes of those universities were likely not born in that state.
You would have to then take that data and convert it to "per capita" for each state to account for population differences.
No such statistics exist.
iowa
>>69223938
>muh per capita
Not everyone is trying to be a World class athlete, there's more to life than sports unless you're a nigger.
Alabama, and it isn't even remotely close.
>>69224011
I'm not him but per capita would be better because it would show how many athletes come from a state proportional to its population. without that its obvious the highly populated states will produce the most
>>69224079
Obviously but not every state focuses on producing said athletes so it would still be pointless to have such statistics.
