WHO WILL TOP THE RANKINGS AFTER THE EUROS?
Probably something like this
1. Germany
2. Chile
3. Argentina
4. Portugal
5. Italy
6. Colombia
7. France
8. Wales
9. Belgium
10. England
>HOW DO THEY WORK??
>>69140005
>england
>anywhere in the top 50
>Argentina not losing a game
>dropping from 1
keep dreaming billy joe jones
>>69140005
England doesn't deserve to be in the top 10 after this.
>>69140005
>England higher
Uhh
>>69140081
>>69140055
>>69140084
Sorry, I'll post the 50-100 page for the USA if you want
>>69140152
The US should be around 15th, England should be about 20th
>taking fifa rankings seriously
WEW lad
>>69140081
they lost to Chile last Sunday
>>69140214
>4th place copa america = 32nd in the euros
Wales will replace Belgium's spot?
A teams total number of points over a four-year period is determined by adding:
The average number of points gained from matches during the past 12 months; the average number of points gained from matches older than 12 months (depreciates yearly).
The number ofPoints that can be won in a match depends on the following factors:
Was theMatch won or drawn? (M)HowImportant was the match (ranging from a friendly match? (I)How strong was the opposing team in terms of ranking position and the confederation to which they belong? (TandC)
These factors are brought together in the following formula to ascertain the total number of points (P):
P = M x I x T x C
The following criteria apply to the calculation of points:
M: Points for match result
Teams gain 3 points for a victory, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for a defeat. In a penalty shoot-out, the winning team gains 2 points and the losing team gains 1 point.
I: Importance of match
Friendly match (including small competitions): I = 1.0
World Cup qualifier or confederation-level qualifier: I = 2.5
Confederation-level final competition or Confederations Cup: I = 3.0
World Cup final competition: I = 4.0
T: Strength of opposing team
The strength of the opponents is based on the formula: 200 – the ranking position of the opponents. As an exception to this formula, the team at the top of the ranking is always assigned the value 200 and the teams ranked 150th and below are assigned a minimum value of 50. The ranking position is taken from the opponents’ ranking in the most recently published World Ranking.
C:When calculating matches between teams from different confederations, the mean value of the confederations to which the two competing teams belong is used. The strength of a confederation is calculated on the basis of the number of victories by that confederation at the last three World Cup competitions (see following page). Their values are as follows:
CONMEBOL 1.00
UEFA 0.99
AFC/CAF/OFC/CONCACAF 0.85
>>69140005
Chile should be #1
>>69140251
>losing to Iceland, drawing against Slovakia and Russia, only beating Wales
vs
>beating Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Paraguay, losing to Colombia and Argentina
>>69140236
a 0-0 draw going to penalties is not considered a loss because even FIFA knows not to award anything to what is essentially a mario party mini-game, and fact is Argentina actually gained points from Chile by defeating them in the group round.
>>69140251
We should be ahead of Rossiya and Checks but Wales, Croatia and Poland deserve to move up.
>>69140299
>losing 2 games
>lost 1 game
americans aren't known for their soccer knowledge !
>>69140284
Nah
But on a second thought, Belgium is #2 so who knows
Wales are gonna shoot up, possibly top 5.
>>69140352
no, the ranking is over 5 years or so
>>69140302
>what is essentially a mario party minigame
I would love to see games decided with a round of Chump Rope
>>69140214
Sorry, hold on a moment. England are undoubtedly awful, shit in every aspect. But as sure as the sun will come up tomorrow, the fucking USA team are worse in every way, so take that burger out your mouth and shove it up your ass you cunt!
>>69140005
>10. England
>14th in the world
>24 countries in Euro
>no Dutch
Fifa rankings really are stupid desu senpai. Or do friendly wins against euro qualifiers give extra points?
>>69140337
The US lost 2 games because >we advanced to the semifinals and then played in the 3rd-place game as well.
UNIRONICALLY THE TOP 10 TEAMS IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW
1. Germany
2. Italy
3. France
4. Chile
5. Argentina
6. Wales
7. Colombia
8. Croatia
9. Spain
10. Poland
>>69140437
>the fucking US team are worse in every way
Yet our team has performed better than yours in the last 6 years.
>>69140469
this
>>69140453
yes and you are currently ranked >31st and you wont >go up >that much >because you didnt win >the cup
>>69140337
>winning 3, losing 2=9 points
>winning 1, drawing 2, losing 1=5 points
Plus you lost to fucking Iceland.
>>69140005
these positions don't change that much, it would take unreal scores from someone like Wales against top teams to get in a top 10 position that quickly, a 3-1 against Belgium works for them for instance, even if it's easier than a possible simple 1-0 win against France, because Belgium is on number 2 and France isn't even on the top 15
it really matters who you play, too, so Euro squads will tend to still dominate and rise forward but not by so much since the major names are going down sooner, which means most of the points will be awarded not as much for the individual matches, but for the two finalists and the champion
the FIFA rankings aren't so reliable, but neither are they like /sp/ meme rankings, if I was to guess it would be something like
Italy
Chile
Argentina
Germany
Belgium
France
Portugal
Colombia
Spain
Brazil
>>69140493
Of course. I'm just saying that the ranking is inaccurate, England's national team is worse than the US's at the moment.
1. USA
2. Wales
3. Iceland
>powergap
4. spics
5. yuros except Onglong
(not ranked) Onglond.
>>69140382
Yes, but greater weight is given to more recent results. Winning (at least) 4 tournament games is huge points, and they were top 10 not that long ago with just doing well in qualifying
>>69140527
We played against stronger opposition, which gives you more points
>>69140527
yes but does that bridge the gap between 11th place and wherever USA is? no. England will stay ranked higher than >us
>>69140549
>bra71l top 10
absolute kek
>England
>top 10
>>69140567
Do you honestly care about the accuracy of FIFA Coca Cola rankings?
>>69140586
>literally an idiot "le 71 meme xD"
I believe understanding how these rankings work is over your inbred head
>>69140566
>stronger opposition
>losing to a dentist
>>69140637
Do you honestly believe wouldn't beat the USMNT?
>>69140684
Iceland wouldn't beat*
>>69140566
>Stronger opposition
Argentina (1st), Colombia (3rd), Costa Rica (23rd), Ecuador (13th), Paraguay (44th)
vs
Wales (26th), Slovakia (24th), Russia (29th) and Iceland (34th)
None of your opponents were even in the top 25.
>>69140469
Portugal BTFO by wales
>>69140005
>england 10
Kek unironically worse been worse than us for at least the past 10 years
>>69140549
in what universe would Brazil's current NT possibly be top 10
>>69140469
Colombia was pretty underwhelming at Copa America desu
>>69140469
>wales
>croatia
>poland
>>69140684
I didn't before. But after seeing you guys struggle so much against Russia, fail to score against Slovakia, and lose to Iceland, I think I'd be optimistic about a possible US victory.
>>69140717
Dont talk to him he literally got eliminated by a part-time dentist
>>69140717
this
/sp/ meme loving fucks don't seem to understand FIFA rankings aren't accurate as-of-now best teams in the world, but a sum of points by beating the best ranked
>>69140554
well they of course will go up, but i dont see them makeing it to the top 5, unless they win the tournament
the other teams in the top 5 simply have done well over a longer time period
its pretty pointless anyway as this ranking is retarded and anyone knows it
>>69140717
>Slovakia 24th
>None of your opponents were even in the top 25
did you proof read that? fat bastard
>>69140717
*top 23
>>69140795
I wrote "top 25" before going back to check the rankings to make sure, then forgot to correct it. Either way, England didn't exactly face any powerhouses.
>All these people obsessed with england
You guys need hobbies.
>>69140709
They wouldn't
Are you unironically rating a team with literal amateur players and manager? USA defeated Ecuado, who are top in the CONMEBOL qualies (ergo better than Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Colombia, etc)
>>69140838
>literal amateur players
Terrible meme. All their players are professional.
Also their manager is Lars Lagerback, who has decades of managerial experience, the part time dentist is joint coach.
Iceland fully deserve to be rated.
>>69140214
m8, Englel may be shit. But you can't just come out and actually imply USGAY is anywhere even near the top 20.
>>69140895
>this damage control
>>69140740
refer to >>69140783
Brazil has a large sum of points from recent friendlies against well-positioned teams: 3-1 on France, 1-0 on Chile, 4-1 on the USA, etc.
that's why it is on seventh, and I even predict it will go down because other teams might get more than 200 points which will bump them up and Brazil down, and that's the difference between Brazil and current tenth place Austria
>>69140914
we're like 22 in the rankings and we're probably going to move up
19th, Id say
>>69140914
Well we're def better than you
>>69140964
theres easily 10 better than you though, and losing to ecuador will hurt your standing even more
>>69140966
31st, probably move up to 30th
>>69140992
there might be, that's not the point of the thread, the list I posted is what I think the FIFA rankings will be like
People are hyping up Wales just a little bit too much.
They have been meme'd this far. Came out of an easy group, played an easy team in the knockouts and just punished a really really fucking shitty Belgian team.
Hate to say it but the moment they are put up against a good team that aren't playing like complete shit they will fold.
>>69140914
Why not? We comfortably beat Ecuador, ranked 13th. We comfortably beat Costa Rica, a team in the top 25. We also beat Paraguay, a team supposedly more on our level. Our only losses in the Copa America were to Argentina and Colombia, both very good teams.
>>69140973
I don't think so honestly. England have had a really shit tournament and the manager is too scared to get rid of dead weight like Rooney. Once someone new comes in the dead weight of the "Golden Generation" can finally be gone for good, as Rooney is the last remanent.
Before the Euros started England were doing great.
>>69141056
>Hate to say it but the moment they are put up against a good team that aren't playing like complete shit they will fold.
good thing that wont happen untill the final
Colombia better not be top 10
>brazil below a team that has actually never won a single important game in this century
keep dreaming britbong
>>69141209
Tbqh I'd be damn surprised if whoever they face in the semi-final play as shit as lelgium. That was honestly worse than I've even seen England play and Wales were still lucky to not concede another goal.
>>69141206
>Before the tournament started England were great
It's been that way since 1966
>>69140469
Belgium unironically had better results to be above Croatia. Can't rate conmecucks since they oversaturated their memecup into de facto irrelevance.
>>69140469
I must say we're robably ~15-20 now but our young team and our brief, 5 second long shitty-taka in the last match is making me hopeful.
>>69141263
They face Portugal, i watched 2,5 games of them and the quality of play is atrociuous
>>69141273
We're the best team in the world when it comes to friendly and qualification matches.
Tournaments.... not so much.
>>69141358
This is easily the worst tournament i've ever watched if we're judging it by quality football.
Hope Italy wins it for the sake of football, but a wales win would be cool.
>>69141206
>Before the Euros started England were doing great.
kek, this reminds me of when Inzaghi (at the time Milan menager) after a series of losses said: we do very well in training, or problems are the games
>>69140553
US4
>>69141406
it's just that all the team that play well were on our side of the table, Spain, us, Germany France were all good more or less, Croatia too but they forgot how to play after the groups
>>69141370
are you wales senpai?
>>69140994
experts at playing minnows, maybe
>San Marino and Estonia
>>69141419
A similar thing happened in the NFL with the Chicago Bears, back in 2014.
>Coach Trestman: "We looked great in practice"
>Team loses 50-0
>Coach Trestman: "We looked great in practice"
>Team loses 50-10
>worst consecutive defeats in literally 100 years
>"We looked great in practice"
>>69141468
Nope, England.
Wales are showing that they're good at tournaments at the moment.
If England were to play USA tomorrow in an Exhibition game England would probably win pretty comfortably. If it was a game in a tournament that would be different as England don't perform under pressure.
>>69141628
>England would probably win pretty comfortably
>no manager
>rooney still playing
>history repeating itself
hmmmm....
>>69140005
Chile won't pass Colombia or Argentina, they all played the same number of matches
Our Journalists said that in the very best case we would end in 3rd position, so i dont care really.
>>69141935
>chilean journalists
>reliable source
kek
>>69140005
>Win a Continental Cup
>Stay in the same place you were before it started
JUST
They should play 4 on 4 after extra time instead of penalty kicks
>>69141686
He's saying that England would win comfortably if there was no pressure, and he's absolutely right. England are better than us at every position, but when they play in a tournament it's like somebody puts lead in their shoes.
>New Zealand
>Rank 147
Thanks OFC.
>>69140055
fpbp
>>69140005
1 - Germany
2 - Argentina
That shouldn't be changed until next WC. And Chile should be 3rd. And maybe the Euro winner 4th if it's not Germany.
Who cares about the rest.
Argentina has 150+ point lead on anyone, only Germany or Belgium can overtake if they win Euro. The problem is Chile lost in group stages and only drew in the final so I don't think there is any way for them to get ahead of Argentina unless FIFA awards points for a trophy instead of match results.
wasn't Portugal around 2nd or 3rd not too long ago? we've been shit since 2004
If Wales get in the top 10 that would be my life made.
1 Iceland
2 Iceland
3 Iceland
4 Iceland
5 Iceland
6 Iceland
7 Iceland
8 Iceland
9 Iceland
10 Fucking Iceland
why are we so low
>>69140469
>putting chile and argentina below the "good" euro teams cause "muh uefa"
Nigga, we all know the are just under germany, Italy didnt even qualified group stáges and france has amazing players but a Kinda plays like an african team
>>69142306
Paraguay could have won the copa america in Argentina besting uruguay in penalties. They could have been the champion without literally winning any game and they wouldnt advance shit in the table
>>69147301
Because friendless for two years barely gives points
>>69140005
>one goal wonder James, Failcow, Jackson Martinez + 8 literal who's is the 3rd best team on earth
Has this ranking accurately predicted anything ever?
why the fuck is austria so high? Fucking austria is a top 10 team in the world? These are so baseless and stupid
>>69140005
>lelgium #2
>>69147343
Nah, Chile would lose to Italy and France. Argentina now, too. Live in the present please
>>69141341
That exchange of passes in front of POR goal was great, sadly there was nobody there to finish it.
I want Poland playing like that for the whole 90 minutes in 2018.
>>69149831
Have you seen the poor level of the Euro? I think Chile or Argentina would rape any of us.
>>69141358
their quality play may be atrocious but their defense is imles above belgium
>>69150281
>le four defenders in a vertical line face
>>69140551
Very clearly at that too. No way would Americans lose to dentists.
1. Germany
2. Chile
3. Argentina
4. Italy
5. France
6. Colombia
7. Wales
8. Portugal
9. Spain
10. Belgium
11. Uruguay
12. Croatia
13. Brazil
14. Poland
15. Iceland
>>69140005
>10. England
Talk about delusional.
Do the rest of us need to laugh at you more?
>>69150583
hes probably one of the idiots who were spamming ITS COMING HOME threads before the euro started. Fucking idiots.
>>69140469
put Colombia out of top10, that team is shit
>>69140152
USA BTFO Ecuador, they have to be top 20
>>69140469
>Wales
>Croatia
>Spain
>Poland
gr8 b8 m8
>>69140469
meme list, go fuck yourself mate
>>69140005
>en2-1and
>>69140005
They work in a pretty dumb way
>all games approved and overseen by the fifa couny
>point multiplier depending on the tyme of game (x1 for friendly games, x2.5 for a WC or conftinental cup qualifier, x3 for confederation cup games, x4 for WC games)
>gain points by winning (more if you win without penalty shootouts)
>small multiplier depending on the other team's ranking
The real problem is that the multiplier based on the other team's strength/ranking does little to nothing because when two good teams play against each other, there very rarely is a large score difference and in the case of friendly games or qualifiers/group phase games, there are a lot of draws, while a team that often faces saller ones will have an inflated rating because they will win consistently and the rank multiplier won't do much.
that's how Belgium ended up team of the year. they walked all over their WC and Euro qualifications by playing against Andorra and other teams of this sort of caliber.
>>69140005
Also, the ranking has not been updated since the beginning of the Euro, andwon't be until it's over.
