now the warriors blew it are the heat still the team of the decade?
>>68727511
Early 2010's Heat and Spurs
Late 2010's Cavs and Warriors
If Heat gets KD, things can change.
>>68727511
patriots have one super bowl title, same amount of titles that every other winner has in the 10's.
>>68727511
> Blackhawks
LA Kings t b h
>>68727563
>kongs
lol no
>>68727511
>not calling it team of the teens
what the fuck is wrong with you man? baka desu senpai
>>68727511
>yfw Eastern Conference will be great again
Hate to say but it's still the Blackhawks for me
hmm
>>68727526
>KD on heat
Shampionshipsh'sh over.
>>68727511
Lebron james is the team of the decade
>pats
Ehh. It's close. The Seawaks have a valid argument to be in there. I think there is plenty of time left for the NFL ago have a 10s decade team.
>>68729631
this. replace the heat image with lelbron and replace the pats logo with goodell.
>>68727511
The patriots and blackhawks logos are problematic desu
>>68727526
>>68727594
>>68729264
KD just watched James bring a ship to his hometown and will want to do the same
He's going to the wizards
>>68727540
No shit, so then you go down the list to see how they win the tiebreaker with the other teams
>Patriots in 6 years of 2010's
1 Super Bowl Championship
2 Super Bowl Appearances
5 Conference Championship Appearances
6 playoff appearances
75-21 regular season record (.781)
>>68727563
What are u autistic. Hawks all day. Kings blow just like LA.
Seattle over NE.
>>68733229
super bowl or bust.
>>68727511
There is no NFL team of the decade yet. Nobody has won twice.
Pats were easily the team of the 2000s but they don't have it yet for the 2010s (though I wouldn't be shocked if they claimed it this season)
>>68735917
>flag
Fuck off back to (B)B.C.
>>68736218
You could make the argument for Seattle since they have had equal amounts of playoff wins and did it in a more competitive division... but Pats are a still a solid choice so far
Why is the Miami Heat logo a ballsack?
>>68738106
they were inspired by the World Cup trophy.
>>68727511
>>68727563
What people fail to realize is that the Blackhawks only won the cup once with the highest goal differential, and they only beat philly by a difference of +1! Meanwhile, the Kings have been +27 and dominant in their cup winning years.
Goal differential is probably the best measure of dominance.
>>68729702
So does the Buncos, but >>68733229 made a good argument. Still, I agree, there's still plenty of time left.
>>68739598
>Goal differential is probably the best measure of dominance.
I think cup wins is the best measure, anon
