So, tell me why we won't win it all in 2017?
Tim Duncan's gonna go full Manning mode if he doesn't retire.
The same reason they didn't this season: Silver.
OKC took 34 more FTAs than SA in the semis. It was never gonna happen.
>>68349127
Yeah but we have LaMarcus to take his place, who is more than capable of handling his share of the work
Too old
>>68349301
They said that in 2013 and 2014
>>68349222
In year 1 of the Leonard-Aldridge era, they won 67 games
I don't expect anything less than 70 wins next year, especially with FA's flocking here
>>68349396
And? They're even older now.
By the playoffs, the average age of the team will be closer to 35 than 25.
LaMarcus is declining, Duncan can't run or jump anymore, Manu is nearly 40, TP is nearly 35, Pop is going senile. Face it, they're done. They won't be serious contenders again until 2020 once Kawhi hits his prime and they've hopefully signed and drafted a new younger core
>>68349092
>their marque player is 70 years old
>the warriors are better
>okc is better
>LeLbron already confirmed 2017 champ
>>68349666
>LaMarcus
>declining
What?
>>68349840
He'll be 32 by next year's playoffs, he's past his prime senpai
>can't even make it out of the second round
Because of the imminent Warriors three-peat
>>68349092
Duncan and Parker have officially reached washed status. They can't defeat time forever.
>>68349888
LaMarcus is in his prime.
This was his first year in the Spurs system. He will be better next year
>so tell me why we won't repeat, we brought everyone back and Kawhi's going to enter his prime
>honestly, we added David West and LaMarcus Aldridge, Kawhi's getting even better, there's zero reason we won't win it all, 75-7 and 16-0 guys
>s-seriously it'll happen this year I swear
>>68349092
Because Silver wants a new dynasty, he went so far as to sabotage LeBron's career, why would he give a shit about the Spurs when they can't meme chuck?
>elderly
>kahwiso ball
>lamidrange post up dinosaur aldridge
>>68349092
Because it's not 1999 anymore. Enjoy your 10 years of irrelevance as you attempt to "rebuild".
because meme chucking makes the league more money so they rig it for those teams to win
>WHO /75-7 & 16-0/ HERE?
>>68349092
>all your core players and even main bench guys are aging and on the brink of retirement
>can't get past OKC
>still stuck in an iso ball mindset with Aldridge
LOL I hope none of you faggots are Blazers fans, because you were begging for LMA to come back to your shit team
>>68349092
Because the elderly generally make poor athletes. Half the roster needs walkers
>>68350140
>salary cap explodes
>Golden state splurges on barnes/ezili so full
>OKC splurge on KD
>SAS only contender with real cap space
>oh hey there mike conley
>how's it going joakim noah
>assemble team of autistic defensive specialists
>shut down entire league with defensive rating of 45
>win the chip with the slowest pace in history of NBA
its happening bros
>>68349092
Because they suck. Pop is an overrated meme, lamarcus is soft, kawhi doesnt want it enough and the good spurs are too old
>>68349092
Because we will.
>>68349092
Because there's this thing called stef kurree and apparently it can shoot 3s pretty well
>>68354828
You mean the same dude who went down 3-1 against the Thunder?
>>68354845
Yea that's the guy
>>68354845
You mean the same Thunder that beat the Spurs?
>>68354880
Yeah, but none of the Thunder's wins over the Spurs were convincing
>>68354924
Westbrook could take a big steamy shit on the Spurs any day of the week
>>68355068
So the Thunder has a ring?
The Golden State Warriors
>>68354924
Lmao, you're fucking delusional.
>>68355306
How am I delusional to point out that in the first year of the LaMarcus era, the Spurs won 67 games?
>>68349092
You'll be dead of old age in 2017
>win it all
>there is only 1 title to win
>>68353187
>Pacesr
>be filled with mediocre talent boosted by a coach who is probably top 5 in the league
>started fading because the roster kept getting worse and worse but managed to be in the playoffs still
>instead of finding good talent, the FO fires the coach that made them relevant in an off-season that good coaches are hard to get by
LOLNO
>>68355352
>the LaMarcus era
Reminder that Aldridge's former team was just as good without him as they were with him. And this is the man Spurs fans are putting their hopes in.
>>68355619
>just as good
>won 7 less games
And the Spurs got further in the playoffs than the Blazers
>>68355640
the spurs did not get further in the playoffs.
in fact, the blazers got further in this years playoffs than last year with LMA
and the spurs got as far as they did last year without LMA
>>68355570
LaMarcus and Leonard
LMA is going to replace Duncan
>>68355479
Please don't tell me what I don't already know......We really are wasting PG13's best years.
