Referee Fuck Ups
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
Show me some things in sports, where the calls were questionable.
>this is not a goal
>introduce video replay
>still make this mistake
For fucks sake.
It went out
>>68123702
What video replay? Soccer refs don't use that shit.
>>68123706
No it didn't. Fuck off.
>>68123816
It literally did you faggot try watching it with your eyes.
>>68123702
They have goal line technology but not for the whole pitch.
literally out
Drones when?
only a top-down camera can be objective on these matters in hard situations
it didn't went out btw, but the linesman raised the flag before the gk fumbled.
no era
why does it matter, both will finish 1 and 2
>>68123965
>>68123855
It was still in, you blind faggots.
>>68124009
Mark Clattenburg: the thread
>>68123816
>>68123934
They introduced that like a week ago for this particular tournament, CONCAfirends.
>>68123965
As with goals, the ball has to completely cross the line. Only half is no good.
>tfw alisson lost his whole year at roma in one moment and there's no way he won't be loaned to ac risotto crotone from serie b
SI ERA
>>68123965
>>68124091
>They introduced that like a week ago for this particular tournament
If that's true, why didn't they fucking check?
>>68124231
wow it really makes you think
>>68124309
It's sort of a test thing. Only if the referee wants. The guy probable forgot or thought it was too complicated.
>>68124231
it didn't touch the ground
>>68124112
can't they cancel the pre-contract?
I feel bad for Roma, he's fucking average and his calls are clearly based on gaúcho bias.
>>68124401
That basketball, retard.
Still, it wasn't out.
SI ERA
>>68124377
Well, they have 2 years to get this system right for the World Cup.
>>68124444
he drew the line as if it touched the ground, 0 perspective
>>68124231
they already showed it back on tv in super hi def freeze frame on trajectory change. it was clearly in.
not sure how a linesman was supposed to make that call with a naked eye in real time.
>>68123706
>>68123855
look where the ball touches off his foot (in) vs where it touches back on the ground (even further in)
It's impossible for the ball to have gone out. What you're seeing is an illusion, confusing the rising of the ball for the ball going out.
>introduce new video technology last week
>DONT EVEN FUCKING USE IT
FUCKING FIFA YOU LITTLE SHIT
>>68124688
and not to mention the lineman was in the other side of the field
>>68124819
>>68124009
>taking the screenshot slightly before the ball was out
fucking off it was out >>68123965
its a very close call, yall should chill.
A goal would have been good for the game. Benefit of the doubt should always go to the attacker in soccer. Makes shit more fun.
https://youtu.be/ACuARRyzjmM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlmV-Wx8gp4
hummels goal vs buyern.
experts already said no offside so don't start a discussion about offside.
the ball was in, buyern won thanks to ref again.
>>68123603
>>68126305
the foul before the freekick wasn't a foul
bvb scorde a goal thanks to refball, but the ref denied it
