>mfw the Memeoirs sweep Lebeta in 6 games
>sweep in 6 games
>sweep
>6 games
Fucking meme fans are the worst. Just start following basketball last year, huh? A sweep means you don't lose a game so it's only possible to sweep in 4 games. Do us all a favor and stop posting, just lurk more till you learn the sport and its terminology.
>sweep
>in 6 games
i don't think you know what that means my friend!
>>68051180
Nice counter-meme
i for one hope the warriors sweep in 7 to see the final game full of lebeta tears
Real talk would 2-5 cement lebron as the biggest superstar level choker of all time?
>>68051310
It would cement him as an Eastern Conference babby more than it would a choker. The Cavs aren't even supposed to win
the warriors have a significantly better team and should win. there isn't much else to say.
>>68051370
>mfw reading cuck lowe this morning
>He is also 2-4 in the Finals. That mark is not as damning as the implacable, cherry-picking critics would have you believe. James has played well in all but one of those Finals, and in three losses, his teams fell to clearly superior opponents. Oscar Robertson, an undisputed top-10 all-time player, made the Finals just twice in his 14-year career.
LeBabbies like him just don't get that 2-4 isn't brought up as residual anti-LeBron hate from the Decision (which was 6 damn years ago, most people are over it). The thing about 2-4 is that it's indicative of the fact that he built his supposedly top-10 of all time career in the worst conference in NBA history.
>sweep
>in 6
Lad...
>>68051310
we've been saying this for like, the past 3 years. he's -been- there. there's no other superstar that's lost like this
>>68051481
the truth is the team that should win usually does and the team lebron is on usually has less good players outside of himself than the other team. there's nothing more to it. everything else is meme shitposting.
>>68051481
Lebron carries teams that would likely be perennial first round exits in the west without him to the finals. Then his TEAM loses to a better team and he gets all the flak for not outplaying 12 people and the media gives westbrick and durcant a pass for not being able to 2vX
I put close to 60.000€ (500.000kr) on Warriors winning game 1 tonight
The quota was 2.3
Did i dun goofd?
>>68051740
>Lebron carries teams that would likely be perennial first round exits in the west without him to the finals.
>taking a max player off a team would make a team much worse
No shit, retard.
And it's not even true, his Heat teams were the most stacked teams in the league each year.
>>68051111
>sweep
>6 games
go fk yrslf
>>68051935
prove it
Warriors sweep in 3.
>>68052018
those heat teams were not the most stacked each year. and never as stacked as mj's 3peat bulls were. warriors this year are far more stacked than any team lebron's been on.
>>68052295
Why?
>>68052430
>those heat teams were not the most stacked each year.
They were the title favourites each and every year Lebron was there. No other team could match their star power (Lebron, Wade, Bosh - 3 franchise players on 1 team) and a great cast of role players (Allen, Birdman, Battier, Haslem, Chalmers, Miller)
>>68052480
>They were the title favourites each and every year Lebron was there
nope
>No other team could match their star power (Lebron, Wade, Bosh - 3 franchise players on 1 team) and a great cast of role players (Allen, Birdman, Battier, Haslem, Chalmers, Miller)
their bench was thin and several teams matched their star power.
Warriors in 7.
>>68052532
>nope
This is a literal fact. They were Vegas favourites to win it all before every single one of those 4 season.
>their bench was thin and several teams matched their star power.
The only other team that had 3 superstars was the Thunder and it was way before Harden was one + they were all like 22 years old.
But sure, please name those several teams that had 3 franchise players on their rosters.
Uncle Toms get stomped
Game 1 - Warriors
Game 2 - Warriors
Game 3 - Cavs
Game 4 - Warriors
Game 5 - Warriors
>>68052634
>This is a literal fact. They were Vegas favourites to win it all before every single one of those 4 season
preseason favorites are utterly meaningless. they were favorites in 2 out of 4 years they were in the finals.
>The only other team that had 3 superstars was the Thunder
every team they faced every year had 3 superstars and a deeper bench.
spurs, mavericks and thunder.
>>68052707
>spurs, mavericks and thunder.
holy shit hahahahhahahahahaha
>>68052832
Who exactly do you consider superstars? JJ Barea? Jason Terry? Kawhi in his 2nd year? A 50 year old Duncan?
Get fucking real.
All guess the score and review it after the game?
109-105 Warriors
>>68052907
103-94 Cavs
>>68052876
spurs- duncan, parker, ginobili, young kawhi and a whole roster full of guys shooting over 40% from 3
mavs- kidd, nowitzki, chandler, terry
thunder- durant, westbrook, ibaka, harden
all three teams had two more superior starters and vastly deeper benches along with three superstars.
>>68052999
If this is your definition of a superstar then Ray Allen, Shane Battier and Birdman were superstars too
>>68053046
lol no
ray allen could only shoot threes. his contributions were no greater than any sniper off the spurs bench.
shane battier is almost equal to any of those three team's lesser starters. and birdman lolno. he was a band aid due to the fact they had no true center and got fucked in the post.
>>68053113
>his contributions were no greater than any sniper off the spurs bench.
His contribution was literally the greatest shot in NBA history
>this fag in here seriously trying to argue that the heat werent favorites every finals they were in
goddamn LeCuck fans are so fucking annoying
You could argue they werent favorites in that last spurs series, but they were favorites in everything else
>>68053136
yes he made a game winner. spurs had a whole bench of guys like that. note that if they had a better team they wouldn't need to be shooting a game winner to win.
>>68053184
they objectively weren't. there's no 'argument'. more lebron hatetards in desparate need of a new strawman to attack.
>>68053196
>spurs had a whole bench of guys like tha
They had a whole bench of the best 3 point shooters in NBA history? (at that point at least)
>>68053255
3 point shooting doesn't carry over year to year or else Curry would never have become the GOAT.
ray allen on the heat played as a 3pt specialist role player equal to any sniper on the spurs.
and if the heat were better, they wouldn't need game winners to win.
Warriors sweep the fuck out of leflop in 5.
>>68053333
>and if the heat were better, they wouldn't need game winners to win.
Or maybe if they had an actual top 10 all time player instead of >le 2-4 soon to be 2-5 man
>>68053392
yeah it's the best player on a team that never even makes the playoffs without him that needs to be better rather than the supporting cast....
>>68053222
They objectively were heavily favored to win it in 2011, OKC was SLIGHTLY favored only because of the heat choke job. Heat were Favored AGAIN after that, and AGAIN after that
Keep sucking LeCucks cock though when he's 2-5
>>68053462
I already posted that they were favored twice and underdogs twice. They won twice and lost twice. You are literally retarded aren't you?
>>68051111
Nice quads
Cavs in 6
>>68053460
Miami made the play offs in 3 of their last 4 Lebron-less seasons (and 7 of their last 9). The one season they didn't they were the most injured team in the league.
>>68053462
did you think that was a legit response tho the post you quoted? you sound butthurt retarded
>2011
Heat favored
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2011/5/31/2198658/nba-finals-2011-odds-miami-heat-dallas-mavericks
>2012
Thunder favored
http://www.covers.com/Editorial/Article/277492
>2013
Heat favored
http://www.covers.com/Editorial/Article/277492
>2014
Spurs favored
http://www.si.com/nba/point-forward/2014/06/02/nba-finals-odds-spurs-heat-favorite-2014
that's:
heat favored 2x
heat underdog 2x
didn't read your drivel narrative past that.
Hey guys, remember when the Chosen One hand picked 2 of his buttbuddies to form a super team together, promised not 1, not 2 ... not 7 championships and then ran away after getting 2 along with 2 of the most embarrassing Finals defeats ever?
>>68053654
3rd link should be,
http://www.si.com/nba/point-forward/2013/04/19/miami-heat-odds-nba-title-finals-thunder-lakers-spurs
>>68053693
why does it make you so buttmad when a player picks two buds to play with rather than it be some rich owner putting three stars together?
>>68051180
>autistic bickering over some stupid terminology that probably isn't even that important
Wew lad, I guess this semen slurping sport isn't for me
>>68053698
dammit wrong link again,
http://www.si.com/nba/point-forward/2013/06/04/nba-finals-odds-miami-heat-san-antonio-spurs
>>68053733
Buttmad? Lol no, I'd be buttmad if they had actually gotten 7-8 rings like Lebron promised. Instead I'm literally lmaoing at those 3 chucklefucks after they delivered the greatest Finals meltdown ever vs the Mavs and suffered the heaviest Finals blow out of all time vs the Spurs.
>>68053693
how in the world do you think losing to the spurs one of the most embarrassing finals defeats ever? it wasn't even slightly embarrassing
i genuinely don't understand you guys
>>68051111
Fuck off.
Lebron will posterize someone, a top 5 dunk in his career
>>68053760
Sweep is a term used in all sports that has serieseseses of games
>>68053785
>losing the Finals by the most lopsided score ever
>not embarrassing
>>68053760
bruh you are a victim of meme on meme crime
>>68053784
so why is it funnier to you when a player who stakes nothing but his desire to win instead of a winner who spends his entire existence putting together star talent and fails?
in context, lebron is relatively successful. higher ups are constantly trying and failing to put together a team capable of winning a chip and lebron did it two out of four tries.
>>68053863
>instead of a winner
*owner
>>68053863
Owners don't hold nationally televised specials to announce they're leaving they're hometown team
Owners don't average 1,5 points in the 4th quarters of an NBA Finals series
Owners don't flop and bitch to the refs after every other play.
Owners aren't shoved down our throats as "the next Jordan" since the age of 16.
Owners don't get all the excuses when things go wrong and then all the glory when they finally go right.
etc etc
>>68053992
40% of those aren't lebron's doing, and the last one isn't even what happens. I see more people giving him shit for being "unclutch"
>>68053992
owners do all of this and then some. all the marketing campaigns, failed signings, etc. all them.
>>68053992
based Polska blowing lecucks the fuck out.
>>68051310
It's not a choke if he's only been favoured to win in twice series
>>68051180
>>68054255
he's actually won about exactly what he should have. losing to the memeiors won't change that. it just gives lebron hatecucks more failed logic to spread to fellow retards on facebook.
