![_89688266_womenfacup_fa[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9CFmntD.jpg "_89688266_womenfacup_fa[1].jpg")
It's Arsenal v Chelsea at Wembley.
Warning: will contain scenes of sport so objectively bad they may cause permanent sight damage.
Kick-off at 2:00pm UK time. Coverage now on BBC One.
Arselel: Van Veenendaal, Scott, Stoney, Henning, Mitchell, Nobbs, Williams, Losada, Carter, Oshoala, Smith.
>Subs: Byrne, Williamson, Janssen, Van De Donk, Natalia.
Lelsea: Lindahl; Blundell, Bright, Flaherty, Borges; Chapman, Spence; Davison, Ji, Carney; Kirby.
>Subs: Spencer, Fahey, Aluko, Rafferty, England.
lmfao womens football, what a joke
go back to the kitchen you mongs
good thread
How many tickets have been sold?
->that empty as fuck stadium
>>67570896
Why even bother hosting it at Wembley, if the upper stands are going to be empty?
>>67570955
>muh equality
>>67570955
Everything must be equal even if it is detrimental to women
this is why women footballers will never get paid as much as men
yet they go on about muh wage gap like it fucking means anything. jesus christ 50% of the world is seriously retarded
Kirby, Aluko and Carney are good players desu
Legit surprised there's a match thread
Fucking disgrace to Americanise the anthem
You would have thought some 'cockneys' would turn up in the hope of seeing their club actually win something this year.
The amount of misogyny in this thread is really worrying, I know it's 4chan and all but you guys don't really hate the female gender, do you? Females absolutely deserve to earn the same amount as men, they do the same thing, no? Kick a ball around and try to score, they do the same thing thus they should earn the same.
God Save the Queen is such shit.
>>67571080
mate there are no girls on /sp/ there's no need to try so hard to get laid through here
Arsenal are playing a 37 year old woman up front
>>67571080
I know this is b8 but no. It's supply and demand simple economics- as evidenced by the 1/4 full stadium there's not a demand for womens football, so they don't deserve as much money.
>>67571031
>they
no gb women players expect to get equal wages with gb men. You can see why US internationals might bitch about it though, because they actually win.
>>67571086
Rule Britannia should be the anthem tbqhwyf
Would a /sp/ XI beat the winner of this game?
>>67570896
>Record attendance
>They finally managed to fill up the first few rows
Only watching to see someone score a sick own goal.
I'm a rabid SJW and my hobby is to watch /pol/fags and male supremicists bitch and cry on 4chan about getting BTFO by the modern world.
This should be a fun thread.
>>67571186
Does america even have a women's league?
>>67571197
easily
>>67571197
Pacey lads at the back. Tall lads at the front. Bang it up field to win corners and head them at the goal. We can grab a goal eventually. What's the average height of a women's team, 5'9?
>>67570955
Why not? What other other stadium can the FA use to maximise profits?.
Use you noggin, lad.
>>67571197
Most likely.
>black player
>telling everyone they're 10 years younger than they are
No surprises there.
>>67571197
15 year old Americans can beat the US womens team, I think we'll win easily m8
>>67571031
>yet they go on about muh wage gap like it fucking means anything. jesus christ 50% of the world is seriously retarded
Do they? Not seen any English footy lass argue the case they should be paid the same as the men.
>onside
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
If only that black girl had a bit of pace
EASILY on side and the defence doesn't give Chase? Holy Fuck. If the ref wasn't dogshit that would have been an easy goal.
>>67571197
>Would a /sp/ XI beat the winner of this game?
Fat fuck autists whose only participation in he sport is twiddling their thumbs?
No.
>>67571347
nice projection senpai
>>67571284
Best tactic would be to play possession. Force them to press to try and win the ball back, and tire them out. Then hit on the counter in the second half.
>you now remember England got 3rd at the world cup
>still no one cares about womens football
suicide watch
>>67571365
Don't deny it. Plus, you pakis are more into creekit.
>>67571385
>that hilarious last minute OG
that's why no one cares
Every play so far this game can be described as ???. Every pass, touch etc is legit confusing
>>67571385
>>67571408
>lobbing your own keeper
Funniest football moment I've seen tbf.
>at 5'10" will be a danger at set pieces
Kek
>>67571197
Genuinely think I'd be able to hold my own on a pitch with these lot. They're technically much better than me (though still a long way from male pros), but I'm pretty sure I could just use my added size/strength to bully them out of the game.
>>67571371
Best tactic is to make it physical imo. That's what happened when my U16 team started playing in men's leagues - we were much better than them technically, so they started kicking the shit out of us, making us angry and hurt, at which point we'd start to make mistakes. Just make sure you get as much player as ball whenever you make a tackle, and they wouldn't be able to handle it.
>>67571417
Makes me wonder if they had good managers if they'd actually get somewhere. Apart from stuff like them just being generally slow, I refuse to believe that the reason they misplace every pass is because they're a woman.
How often do they even train? Don't they still get their wages from the FA too?
>5'10 is going to be a danger here
Is this for real?
just noticed that this is the first time the new chelsea kit is on show
>>67571408
It was quintessential England 2bh
>>67571483
Think they've been playing with that kit for a while now
>>67571464
It's because they're mostly semi-pro.
The quality probably would improve if it was fully professional.
>>67571464
Even a shit manager can teach them that punting a ball at your mates chest from 3yds is a poor choice of a pass.
>>67571472
It's relative. They aren't playing against fucking lanklet men are they?
>>67571464
The top division is all pro now, they train as much as the men they are just shit at it compared to men
You are now aware that Chelsea ladies is in the CL while the male team is not even in EL.
>>67571499
I think that too. The bar for actually becoming a womens footballer just seems so low. If the clubs paid them according to their skill maybe some of them would make an effort to actually get good.
>>67571508
You know when some kid relative comes up to you and shows you something absolutely fucking stupid, but you just say "That's nice" and praise them anyway? I honestly think that's what these managers must be like.
Who would be the best manager to scream at them and tell them to stop being so stupid?
>>67571555
Apples and potatoes.
>>67571537
>The top division is all pro now
Wrong
>The WSL 1 currently consists of nine clubs and the season is played over the summer months.[16] Initially the league was described as professional, with the top four players on each team being paid an annual salary in excess of £20,000.[17] However, in November 2010 it was confirmed that the WSL will be semi-professional, with only a "handful" of top players full-time.[18] Club's annual wage bills will be approximately one-tenth of those in the American WPS.[18] The FA envisage that the league will become fully professional in future, should it prove successful
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FA_WSL_1
They need to get rid of these commentators who act like they are best buds with all the players
Impossible to take seriously
>>67571578
Shit players and shit players.
>>67571537
How the fuck can they attract enough attention to go pro? Is it even on telly?
G O A T G O A L
O
A
T
G
O
A
L
the state of that marking
Not bad
>>67571612
On BT sport
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4lXthHJUw4
CUURRVE TELLAY
>>67571464
iirc the top players are all pro now, and I assume their funding comes from some sort of national governing body because I'm sure they don't bring enough revenue in to fund it themselves. It's a bit like disabled sport, where they get lots of funding for no real reason other than equality. I'm studying sport psychology and am looking for opportunities in pro sport (although I'll probably give up because it's a shit career) - there's lots of opportunities in women's and disabled sport because of their funding, but none at pro football clubs lower than the Championship, even if they're getting 10-20k people turning up each week, because they can't afford those support staff.
I could do that against a 5'5 keeper to be fair. I work with a lad who is 6'5 and he sometimes plays on weekends. I can't even imagine what he would do in the box.
>1 on 1 with the keeper
>shoots at the byline
literally why
This slag commentator is fucking awful
>lel they're shit they can't do anything
>bird runs down the left wing, beats three and curls it into the far corner from 25 yards
>i-i could do that
>>67571687
What really happened
>player 1 vs 5 and no one bothered trying to pressure her
>>67571687
I could though.... against women
>>67571687
if you played even a little football you'd realise that what she did was piss easy
>>67571712
...on my vidya
Id rather watch the league 1 play offs tbqh
BBC are fucking cancer
>>67571712
For many many years I've watched millionaires panic, lean back and hoof it over the bar from the same position, so no.
>>67571747
Murdoch, pls go.
>>67571747
Abolish the license and they'll be dead in a month. Shit company holding everyone hostage with their shit fees.
>>67571747
Got this on until the Barca game desu
>>67571765
When they're given a split second to make a decision not when everyone is standing off and giving you all the time and the space in the world to do whatever you want
This is nervewracking. Why do they look so uneasy on the ball?
Goal is too big for that keeper
Bit unfair
>>67571777
Bollocks they would. Move to a subscription based service and/or commercial organisation and they'd survive
>Shit company holding everyone hostage with their shit fees.
You mean the Government, you thick cunt?
>>67571677
Can't be critical of the players at all. Sure you don't have to go mental at them, but don't praise shit moves please.
>>67571777
We can't abolish it because "who would have given people like David Attenburough his start?" I could probably buy everything I watch in a year on the BBC on Bluray and it'd cost me about 40 quid.
For now they still have those 1/2 good documentaries a year that they can use as an excuse to run strictly for the rest of the year.
>all these unintentional layoffs where a player has to save their teammates fuck ups
>>67571851
>run strictly for the rest of the year.
You mean for a few months at the end of the year?
Stop exaggerating, you meff.
>>67571888
Oh ok sorry Strictly near christmas. Then Masterchef, Celebrity Masterchef, Professional Masterchef, The Apprentice, Eastenders, The Voice, etc
Huge waste of money.
>tfw not even watching the match just reading the thread for bants
>>67571907
same
as if I'd ever poison my brain with women's football
>>67571902
>if i only pick the programs i don't like, it will validate my view the bbc is shit and wastes money.
How is this not a handball? Literally touched both hands outside the box.
>>67571902
>The Voice
They've lost that to ITV. You've got a point though.
>>67571907
Same. I mean, silly girls playing a manly game like football? What could possibly go right??
>>67571907
It's fun. You're never far off some fucking howler occurring.
I do find it funny that people genuinely pay money for a TV license
NEWSFLASH: THE INTERNET EXISTS
>>67571917
>as if I'd ever poison my brain with women's football
You remember when that woman linesman gave offside for a throw in lads?
This s/pol/ raging is fucking ridiculous. The women's cup final has been on TV for at least 25 years and nobody was claiming some international sjw conspiracy and demanding the closure of the BBC.
>>67571951
haha nice response bro!
you fucking pathetic cretin
>>67571950
£145 is pretty much peanuts and why the fuck would I want to watch TV on a proxy 15" laptop screen?
>>67571950
Watching TV is the only hobby aged 30+ people have.
>>67571957
>/spol/ is one person
might just watch the bayern game tbqfh
could knock in 5 or 6 against hannover
>>67571830
Do that then. I don't give a shit. I just don't want the turf that is the BBC. Exactly 0 times a week it has something worth watching.
>>67571977
>why the fuck would I want to watch TV on a proxy 15" laptop screen?
Yeah because HDMI cables don't exist
>>67571983
/spol/ is plural
dead slag
>>67571907
>tfw would do the same, but wife is forcing me to watch it with her daughter
>>67571981
You know, I actually don't understand them. What's the point when you can watch you want when you want it thanks to the internet?
>>67572001
So why don't I just plug a fucking aerial in?
>Flaherty
>>67572022
Because only a retard would watch live TV
>>67571999
>Exactly 0 times a week it has something worth watching.
In your opinion.
Just don't pay for it if it upsets you. Don't use their website, don't listen to their radio.
You can successfully avoid paying the TV license if you're clever.
The BBC should drastically reduce the license fee, stop focusing on so much 'entertainment' programmes, and just stick to politics and some radio along with more relevant/high brow stuff. Just a basic public service that at least attempts to be politically unbiased (despite their admitted institutional bias).
>>67572019
Btw, I am aware that not everything is online, I am talking about movies and often documentaries.
>>67571977
>>67572022
And this is the peak of the typical TV license cuckold.
>>67572019
Comfort. It's comfort, an inability to adapt to change and a complete lack of interest in researching where your money could be better spent.
>that shot
jesus wept
>>67572019
Boredom, half the time I sit in front of the TV watching nothing in particular and just flicking through the same shit
Can waste a good couple of hours just doing that
>>67571920
Ok I'll say what I do like about the BBC. It does show things that no other channels would, like this game we're supposedly watching. The Invictus Games that are on at the moment, Eurovision (it's shit but it's not the BBCs money anyway), BBC News is the best even if it has become more biased, the world service is great.
Problem is those things don't cost me 150 quid a year to watch. Whereas stuff like the Graham Norton show must cost fucking loads. I still can't believe people will watch what is essentially an advertisement or stage for shills. People like Chris Evans being paid far far too much.
>>67571932
Think they're losing Bake Off too which is a start. The problem with the BBC is is that it's supposed to entertain everybody, but over the years it's stuck to one demographic really. Far too many quiz shows, panel shows, singing/baking etc contests instead of putting at least some time aside for people who aren't potatoes.
>>67571950
Enjoy your niggerstreams for live events
>>67572047
Tv license is required for any broadcast, not just the BBC. I wouldn't have it at all if not for my girlfriend. I just use Now TV.
[greentext]women[/greentext]
[quote=@67572087 ]
[greentext]women[/greentext]
[/quote]
Lol newfag
This semen slurping sport just isn't for me.
I never watch the TV but had it on the other morning and they were having a license debate. A lot of the pro arguments were "in Nigeria we would have no idea about the world without BBC so don't change it'. Like how is that my problem. I don't give a shit. If you want news watch Al Jazeera. Planet Earth etc are good but I've never seen them on the BBC. I got the bluesy for 20 quid.
>>67572033
That's fine fucking logic, lad. You must be the brains of this bunch.
>>67572078
Yes, I am aware of that and you can avoid paying it if you're clever. But the license also funds the radio and online content too, so I assume you're not using these either. Or are you one of these spoilt brat everything for nothing generation plebs?
>>67572063
>money could be better spent
£145 a year where I can watch whatever I want and listen to the radio and pay for their website.
I don't want a fucking HDMI hanging out the side of my laptop watching shit-quality images of sports when I can just sit back turn the TV on and relax.
I used to date the Arsenal left-backs big sister in highschool.
>>67572150
So did I.
>>67572143
so basically you're a moron
>>67572131
>Like how is that my problem. I don't give a shit.
anon has spoken everybody, disband the world service now
Chelsea qt business fullback when?
>>67571308
15 year olds who actually played the sport at a professional club though.
>>67572173
Not an argument
>>67571086
the queen should be put down
>>67572143
>£145 a year where I can watch whatever I want and listen to the radio and pay for their website.
I can watch whatever I want right now for free. Because there isn't anything I want to watch on the BBC so far this year.
I would pay to continue some of the radio (cut asian network 1xtra etc, cut the highest paid R1/R2 presenters) and parts of the website (whoever gets paid for running the "Trending" part of BBC news is a fucking genius I could never scam so many people at once). Problem is it's not worth 145 quid.
>>67572167
But i really did
>paying to use services
>moron
Millennial logic
>>67572143
Half the stuff on the telly you will never watch and you could spend much less JUST paying for the stuff you will
. If you're the type of person to flick through the shit for hours on end like a complete sheep and then Stockholm syndrome the fuck out of it in a Women's FA cup thread then go for it.
>>67572204
I think old father time will get her soon enough.
>>67572143
No. I don't even own a radio and have literally no idea what they put online. I certainly have no interst in the shite music the BBC pumps out.
I own physical films and CDs and stream tv. The BBC can fuck right off.
>>67572174
Don't disband it, but why the fuck should I pay for it?
>>67572199
My cousin was in the Liverpool academy program at 12. Didn't mean anything though because unless they actually play for the team they could be just average. That's why you always hear about people being dropped from top teams academies because they have many more kids than they will keep on.
>>67572213
prove it
>>67572206
>I can watch whatever I want right now for free. Because there isn't anything I want to watch on the BBC so far this year.
So what's your argument?
Don't pay the license fee if you're not using any of the BBC services. There are ways you can avoid it if you cared to research.
No fucking point crying about it if you're paying the fee aren't there's nothing they offer that appeals to you.
>>67572204
t. morrissey
>>67571086
Worst anthem in the world.
I like the Queen she's a decent lassie, but the anthem celebrates only her and not the country, which it should.
>>67572254
>Don't pay the license fee if you're not using any of the BBC services
I don't pay. I do listen to R4 and use the website though. It's just not worth 145 quid.
I would pay 40-50 quid if they did what I said in my post.
post webm
>>67572223
Is this in English, or are you that angry you don't even bother to proof-read your argument before smashing the 'post' button?
Remember when half the world was crying about their total shit Olympics coverage and desperately leeching the BBC's 12 live streams?
>>67572297
what a finish
>>67572227
Fair enough. If you're not using anything they produce, don't pay the fee. You can successfully avoid it.
>>67572241
Are you using any service the BBC produces? If not, don't pay the fee.
>>67572245
My point is that they were regularly training and playing each day whereas half of /sp/ probably haven't kicked a ball in over a year.
not a big fan of this BBC shill lads
>>67572330
You have to pay to watch any tv, so if I watch sky sport I have to pay for the TV license too.
>>67572330
I watch the BBC all the time and don't pay the fee. Fight me.
>>67572278
So you're essentially stealing their services and getting angry because they don't produce more that interests you. Kek.
BTW, if you're only using the radio you can buy a monochrome TV license that costs £49 that will cover you.
>>67572309
Lel. BBC's sports coverage of top-tier sporting events is pretty good. Certainly decent value for money.
>Dan Carter scores for Arselel
I knew they were all men who were too shit to make it in the men's game so they decided to get fake boobs and tuck.
>>67572330
tfw accidentally read an article on the BBC and now I owe £145 :'(
>>67572300
Second Peter 2:2, 12-13 “But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. But these, like irrational animals, creatures of instinct, born to be caught and destroyed, blaspheming about matters of which they are ignorant, will also be destroyed in their destruction, suffering wrong as the wage for their wrongdoing. They count it pleasure to revel in the daytime. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their deceptions, while they feast with you.”
Please leave, devil.
>>67572366
Yes, I fucking know that, however you can avoid paying the fee and not be prosecuted if you cared to actually research this.
Not that I would condone that sort of behaviour ;)
>>67572382
You're a wee bugger, lad.
>>67572415
Fuck the Quran!
>>67572415
>>67572300
battle of the megaminds going on up in this fucker
I take it this cup final is fucking enthralling based on the direction of discussion in this thread.
>>67572411
No. The website is free to use, it's just funded for by the license, lad.
>>67572449
Go shit yourself.
>>67572468
Trash as expected. I find it hard to believe these are the top two still.
>>67572389
>BTW, if you're only using the radio you can buy a monochrome TV license that costs £49 that will cover you.
I want my money to go towards what I do use though. If I buy a TV license they'll focus more on TV because more people have televisions is what the data will tell them. It's the reason we have so many entertainment shows, because they get the biggest numbers and so they focus on that.
Problem is it's people like you or people who do watch strictly and other entertainment who just drown out the other voices. If you say you want to cut funding because it's not good value you get attacked. People talk about Murdoch being the one the political parties want to keep on their side so he doesn't rape their appearance around election time, but as we were shown the other day the BBC is just as powerful a tool now especially for the left.
Penalties plz
It's nice to see football without divegrass every few seconds
>Talking about licence fees is more interesting than the actual game
Loving every laugh.
>This awful smelly looking nig still gets in the team
>>67572569
I don't watch Strictly, Eastenders or much of the other light entertainment stuff. Some people clearly do though, license fee-payers, who themselves have a right to an opinion on what the BBC produces.
ebin donkey touch
>That woeful touch
Like a female Gervinho
Jonathan Pearce is such a whiteknight.
>the BBC is just as powerful a tool now especially for the left.
>>67572604
That sexy little Chelsea one with the big forehead?
Would pound her little ebony pasty ngl.
>Live Diving on the red button
Is that the final round of Liga matches?
>>67572650
The woman commentator is really bad. Get someone on with some personality.
>>67572641
Mate she looks like she stinks rotten
dont blame you though
This is comedy gold
>>67572675
If she stinks of woman sweat then good.
>>67572696
My dick twitched
The Ant&Dec celebrity match is a better than this.
>>67572606
You're right, they do, and they are free to pay 145 quid if they want.
I watch maybe 20 hours of BBC television a year. Some people get paid less per hour than I pay watching the BBC.
>>67572625
The BBC has been attacking the conservatives and UKIP pretty frequently for the past number of years. The conservatives would love to get rid of the fee but they can't because they'd be slaughtered.
Most of the BBC political showings now consist of "My opinions > yours" instead of a debate.
>>67572740
Way better. Remember that chip serge pizzorno scored
Who else is playing spot the dyke?
>>67572768
Not exactly Where's Wally
>>67572768
Aren't they all dykes?
Get the physios on my fat fucking legs can't stand up for 90 minutes.
>>67572668
>women
>personality
Most women think "personality" is their obnoxious fat bitch friend that describes herself as bubbly.
>van der donk
PUT A DONK ON IT.
>>67572782
A few will pretend to be gay just to fit in.
>>67572802
Wasn't that some shit song on an obscure mtv channel?
>>67572745
>The BBC has been attacking the conservatives and UKIP pretty frequently for the past number of years.
Ah yes, and they never ever attack Labour of Lib Dems do they?
>>67572826
Ryan Babel
They all look so small on the pitch. Like 22 Juan Matas.
What happened to Hertha Berlin. Kek.
Such poor quality
>>67572802
Am I allowed to unironically like this song?
reckon emile heskey would be the best player on the pitch if he came out of retirement lol
>>67572838
I didn't say that. But they definitely do attack them a lot less. Jeremy Corbyn would be gone by now if they did at the same rate.
It wasn't always like this sure. But there's definitely a bias being shown in most things by the BBC now. Do you think this isn't true?
>>67572826
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckMvj1piK58
>9m hits
Official thread song.
ohhhhhhhh Vicky,,,,, you got me wacky ; )
I wonder if John Terry is hiding somewhere with his kit ready for the Chelsea come back and team photo
>>67572740
>>67572761
I love old 'legends' matches. They're so much fun. Watching my man Barsei defend is GOAT.
What's that Irish guy called, Patrick Kielty? Or something. He's amazing as a GK.
>crowd filled with Arsenal fans
They want to see the club win something. Anything.
>>67572930
haha it's not like we won the last 2 FA cups in a row or anything lmao xD
>>67572937
>we
>>67572920
Can't wait for him to be handing out the drinks during stoppages next season.
I've been doing the washing up, have they shown stats? I'm expecting pass completion rates of about 40%.
>>67572901
>Jeremy Corbyn would be gone by now if they did at the same rate.
Don't be daft, lad.
>>67572930
You're surprised there are Arsenal fans watching an Arsenal play a cup final?
>image
Dumb phoneposter, what a surprise.
>>67572937
Not like you bottled the league again with all the big clubs out of the way haha.
Not even the biggest club in North London anymore. That's got to sting.
>>67572999
>You're surprised there are Arsenal fans watching an Arsenal play a cup final?
Did you forget a word in your rage? Kek.
>>67573028
fuck off you bellend
>>67572983
I think he would. He's already constantly at the threat of being deposed I think if the media were against him too it'd give rise to challenges by other members of the party.
I don't really like the current conservative leadership either really, but everything for them is going decently so far except for press coverage. Things like the doctors strike is being put on the health secretary instead of the PM.
>>67573055
I'm literally shaking anon.
>>67573028
What has Spurs won in the last 26 years?
>>67572901
the irony of course is the Conservative party now want to enshrine the BBC's diversity agenda into its royal charter. The same Conservative party that cuts police funding, campaigns to stay in the EU, accepts mass migration and multiculturalism as positives to British society and the same Conservative party smelly leftists complain is too "right wing".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35464634
Why does my license fee go towards this? How can I opt out of it without throwing my television out of the window?
>Kirbmeme
>>67573056
Lel you're mad. How does it feel to be lesser to Tottenham now?
Fucking Tottenham are more relevant.
At least you'll always have women's football m8. Haha.
>>67572937
It's not the 50s anymore, m8.
>>67573028
so, what you're saying is, out of all the big clubs Arsenal bottled it the least? okay...
>>67573066
>>67573066
You don't think that at all. You're just exaggerating a narrative.
Laura Kussenberg can't hide her contempt for Corbyn if she tried, it's something the lefties use to attack the BBC's impartiality.
que?
>>67573087
The hearts of the people. And now they're officially the biggest team in their area as well.
>>67573089
Just stop paying and refuse entry to your property to any inspector.
>male manager beats female manager
ARSENAL ARSENAL ARSENAL
ABAs BTFO
I really want a sportsfu.
Would like to get into a sweaty after match shower with these.
>>67573028
So, what you're saying is, Arsenal did fucking amazing? After all, we're not even the biggest team in North London. So being 3rd is pretty fucking good. Especially since Spurs (the biggest in North London) took 2nd (it might not be by Monday!).
That's not bad desu.
But I'm sure the £2.25 Billion team of Chelsea and £1.25bn team of City aren't as big as Arsenal, or are they? What about £300m United?
Which is it? Either Arsenal are small and thus they've overachieved, or they are big and they underperformed.
Which is it anon?
>>67573219
>WHICH IS IT TELL ME YOU BASTARDING HERETIC
>>67573219
Why did Tottenham and Leicester finish above you?
>>67573247
Arsenal can still finish above Spurs you know.
At least the Arsenal hierarchy don't need to worry about the mens team sleazing on or being distracted by the female team.
/spoiler/ The mens team are all gay. /spoiler/
>>67573219
>being this fucking mad
Lol. Bye m8. Enjoy your women's FA Cup win.
>>67573268
>newcastle beating spurs
>straws
>grasping
>>67573247
refball + injuries. Gabriel got sent off at Stamford Bridge for being punched 3 times by coster. Dembele can eye gouge Costa and not even pick up a yellow. Dier can pull someone's shirt right in front of the referee and not get a second yellow card either.
The reality is Arsenal are a bigger club than Tottenham. If we weren't, we wouldn't be second favourites for the title next year behind Man City.
Not even anyone relevant to hand them the trophy
TOPKEK!
>>67573089
It can't be stopped sadly. We're going to get non-stories from around the world whether we like it or not.
>>67573135
I do think that. Corbyn might not even have the media on his side, but the fact they're not putting pressure on a frankly ineffective useless Labour party who has lost Scotland and did extremely poorly in the local elections is benefitting him.
The good thing about people like her and the other bigger names at least is the fact that you see them often enough you know their personal bias. It's the television shows and general news articles that do lean to the left. You need only to look at the coverage of the migrant crisis to see what way the corporation itself leans. From the pictures they use, the narrative, etc.
Having someone like Laura isn't bad, because you can see their name (and picture for some reason) at the top of their articles. If I'm listening to Katie Hopkins on LBC I'm not going to expect something left or even central. People will always be biased one way or another, but it's the things like television shows where it's not done by "Laura Kussenberg" but by "The BBC" where it's a problem.
>>67573320
Spurs' form is pretty poor of late.
The fact is, it's still fucking possible, you obnoxious cunt.
>>67573333
but you're not and you'll never be anywhere near even a consideration for the title because you've proven time and time again that even if everyone else is shit you'll still find a way to bottle it
>>67573356
>media should put pressure on a political party to oust their leader
wew lad. Where do you think you are?
>>67573333
>we're big because of odds
Top kek.
Do you even know how odds are calculated?
>black dad
>white kid
JUST
U
S
T
would donk desu
>>67573438
Yep, do you? Tottenscum finishing above Arsenal is a variance that was bound to happen eventually. Still, it's been half a century since they were the best team in the land and a quarter of a century since they won a major trophy. Only players with mental deficiencies would ever choose Tottenham over Arsenal. We have more fans, a bigger stadium, better players, a richer history, more revenue and a bigger transfer budget. Tottenshit lucking it's way to 1 point above Arsenal for the first time in 21 years doesn't change that
>>67573430
You're misinterpretting what I'm saying. Jeremy Hunt can't do what he's doing without Cameron's approval. Right now though the majority of people are screaming at Hunt instead of asking Cameron to step in and stop it. The BBC can be impartial here but often the union is painted in a good light while Hunt is seen as the big bad.
It's just basic politics that people don't seem to get. Cameron will support Hunt unless he thinks he will lose too much support, at which point he removes Hunt from the cabinet and is seen as doing nothing wrong.
>yuropoor sports
>>67573594
>sheboons
no thanks, americuck
