What say you, /sp/?
I don't know about wins or whatever but Jordan would fucking ruin Klay's life.
>>66581527
Would prolly sweep them in 6 2bh
>>66581527
Old wash ups just butthurt that they couldn't hit threes in their prime if their lives depended on it
>>66581527
How would the Warriors fare vs. the 01 Lakers?
>no warriors vs Big 3 Heat
>All the memes for 7 games
>>66581570
just like how they fared against the 16' lakers
>>66581527
if they're allowed to play 90s defense, of course
>>66581570
MAYBE Curry could guard pre-prime Kobe, but could they stop Shaq? I doubt it.
>>66581549
Wow what an idiot. A sweep means you win every game, retard. If it takes 6 then not a sweep.
>>66581621
>curry
>defend anybody
Lmao, prime curry would get cucked way too hard by Kobe.
>>66581625
le i'm pretending to be retarded man
>>66581625
>getting meme'd on
Is this your first day here newfriendo
>>66581527
the warriors would sweep the bulls
the 3 is a game changer
the bulls cant score enough
He's prolly right. Harper, pippen, and Jordan were all interchangeable god tier defenders. Rodman was a menace to deal with too.
>>66581700
This
Curry would pick apart that Bulls D
>>66581709
>Rodman vs Draymond Green
That Curry-Green PNR is getting blown up every time.
>>66581570
they would get brutally raped, draymond and bogut would foul out by half-time, shaq would go for 60 each game
kobe would be able to commit to simply stopping curry, they wouldnt even need his offense
>>66581527
he's right, Jordan would mentally destroy Curry and Thompson
sigh
this has already been discussed by stephen a smith and skip bayless, the consensus was out of respect for the warriors Stephen gave them winning one game only while Skip said it would be a sweep.
by the rules they had in place then too
That pistons team with rip, chauncey and the Wallace bros would fuck up this warriors team. Don't think those kobe/shaq teams matchup particularly well unless shaq went God mode.
Sweep in 3
>>66581835
>by the rules they had in place then too
Those rules mean a shorter 3 point line. Curry/Klay would be shooting .600 from 3
how would they fare agains the bad boys?
>>66581570
They'd match up better than the Bulls because Shaq would destroy GSW's small ball lineup
>>66581902
Curry sure, but Klay would be shook as fuck
>>66581903
Isaiah would eat currys lunch.
>>66581903
>Warriors forfeit because of lack of healthy players
tfw we'll never get to see Rick Mahorn and fight an entire organization again.
As much as I hate the old timers talking shit about the current guys, Pippen is right here. That Bulls team would be a terrible matchup for this Warriors team. And if they played in that era Curry would JUST be a shooter because his body couldn't handle going in the paint in those days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e1TbU1vrZ0
They're a bit old now desu
i can't see them winning
>>66589323
> german HH
kek
What rules are they playing with?
If it's before defensive play go punished like crazy, then the bulls would win otherwise warriors take it
>>66591618
>implying anyone could actually defend Jordan with current day rules. The only way to stop him before was to put 3 guys and physically assault him, and eventually that didn't even work when pippen and co came along.
>>66581625
You must be new here.
>>66592932
This. NBA is so nerfed today. Put any team of today up against the Bulls or Bad Boy Pistons and they would carry the other team off on stretchers.
Bulls sweep in 6.
>>66592932
Saying this when Jordan was a defensive player of the year and fucking Dennis Rodman all he did was defense for his whole career
>>66593098
Either way, 90s rules and the Bulls beat the shit out of the Warriors under the glass. 10s rules nad the Bulls are completely unleashed to drive the lane at will or shoot anywhere on the court.
>>66593157
I'm just saying, the bulls weren't just great because they outscored people, they prevented people from scoring
hes delusional desu, the game has evolved. even the spurs would beat them ffs
>>66593266
>evolved
You mean made easier.
bulls didn't even sweep those Knicks lol
Bulls would sweep in 7.
>>66581527
anybody who says otherwise doesn't realize jordan would be fucking currys mom the night before the first game. he'd do literally whatever it took to shake curry. currys fg% would be utter ass
i dont think anybody ever played their best game against the prime bulls and when the warriors fall apart they do it catastrophically
>>66593295
>muh nostalgia
fuck off 90s babby
Jordan with the first threepeat where the only other relevant player being Pippen shows just how good Jordan is.
>>66581799
No way Draymond and Iggy could contain shaq
>>66589218
Curry and Klay with a shorter 3 point line... Dawg they only need shooting.
>>66594480
niggas flop like divegrass players now. curry wouldn't be able to shoot for shit with a shattered orbital bone.
>>66581718
>>66581527
>a team from the easiest era ever thinks it could sweep a team from a much tougher era
Nah
95-96 Rules
>Short 3 point line
Top kek, Bulls will be fucked.
Warriors would score at least 130 points per game.
Current Rules
>Bulls will still get fucked cause they can't into 3s.
>>66581625
Newfag detected.
>>66597275
>Not knowing who Bill Cartwright and Horace Grant are
KYS you fucking casual.
>>66581527
They're all old as fuck right now, what a ridiculous thing to say
>>66597275
>>66598154
Paxson missed 3 games in THREE SEASONS and you're saying he wasn't an integral part of the three-peat?
>>66598048
Toughest era was late 80's. Easiest was early 2010's.
>>66598209
Talent wise and toughness the easiest era is and always will be 90s
The toughest was the 80s but no one can deny the talent we have had in the past 15 years blows out the talent we've had in the past 30
I think it's pretty unreasonable to say that the Bulls would sweep them.
I think it's more reasonable to assume they would trade games with each over
scottie pippen right now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0IkZ08M4k4