>away goals rule
Why is this allowed? Why not do extra time or penalties? It's gotta suck balls to watch your team get knocked out that way
dumb frogposter
>>66246654
It discourages bus parking
>>66246654
reddit pls go and stay go
>>66246654
I think it's outdated now. Somebody actually did a report on it, and in Europe it's been shown there's no real advantage to playing home or away first leg.
>>66246654
i don't like this rule too, but they need to do something to against pic related.
I like it because without it every manager would be happy with sitting back when playing away and taking a 0-0 draw back home.
With it, a 0-0 draw is very dangerous for the away side
>>66247390
Atletico parked the bus against PSV in the 2nd leg because they knew if PSV scored, Atletico would have to score 2 goals in order to win.
>>66247651
Atletico were the more attacking in that game
They had more possession, more passes, more shots, more corners etc
>>66247651
>i didnt watch the game
PSV were the ultra defensive ones you mong
>this thread, again
If you don't like it, then what's an alternative?
>Super Bowl deciding coin flip
>>66247713
>>66247723
None of what you said changes the fact that they didn't score a single goal for over 210 minutes. If it wasn't for the away goals rule, they could have been even more aggressive.
>>66248034
None of what you said changes the fact that you didn't watch the game (or watched but didn't pay attention) and have no idea what are you talking about.
>being against a rule that provided some of the best moments in football history, like Iniesta's goal in Stamford Bridge
That's a legitimate strategy. There are no rules in the NBA to prevent hack-a-Shaq
