Because the American owners are trash

Martial is the bigger flop.

>>66194632
The owners basically let Rodgers pick who he wanted in 2015.

>>66194661
Literally every single Jewmited signing has been a flop

>>66194670
>Literally every single Jewmited signing has been a flop

De Gea?

Liverpool are a midtable club that only gets any press coverage because of the large number of plastics that follow them.

>>66194735
>that flag

Opinion discarded

>>66194669
Isn't that the problem?

>>66194813
When discussing the English Premier League, there is no difference in flags when it comes to Ireland and the US. Watch your own fucking league or accept the globalization of football.

>>66194830
There is not a single person in the UK will agree with your ridiculous post that Liverpool are a mid table club. Liverpool are and will always be seen as a top 4 club, regardless of their current league position.

>>66194669
My point exactly. They need a director of football

>>66194735
>plastics
Liverpool fans are actually incredibly loyal to their club, if you compare it to Manchester United who had an empty stadium almost every game last season when they weren't in the CL

>>66194815

Not really. Owners in general rarely know much about the transfer market or how to identify talent, they have to rely on their employees to find them. In this case, the guy they relied on was crap, so they fired him and went out and got somebody who is supposed to be one of the very best.

>>66194886
keep dreaming paddy

liverpool are a joke, and historically the most hated team (and people) in the UK

>>66194886
Aside from the season where Suarez dragged them into second place, they have finished 6th-8th in the last 6 seasons. We'll see if Klopp can change things, but they have a mediocre squad and it will be a lot of work for him.

>>66194923
>historically the most hated team

They're historically the most hated because they're historically one of the best. Perennially mediocre teams don't get that kind of hatred, nobody really cares about Spurs or Stoke.

>>66194918
Comparing your stadium atmosphere to United, City or Arsenal means nothing. It's not like Liverpool aren't subject to sit-down-tourists either.

>>66194626
>benteke leaves before balotelli
LEL

>>66194923
>>66194938
>historically the most hated team
But this isn't true. There have been surveys on this and Liverpool are often a popular favourite with neutrals. On /sp/ is hating Liverpool a thing.

>>66194954
at least balotelli is out on loan

>>66194886
What about Leeds

>>66194626
Because Brodgers is not a good manager at all, Klopp will change it.

I'd be really interested to see how Villa's season would have gone if they hadn't sold Benteke and Delph.
would they be bottom? would Sherwood still be there? how many of the summer signings would have been made?

>>66194989
Sherwood is far from a top manager, but if you give him some decent skill in the team, he will do well enough. Villa would be nowhere near as bad off as they are now with those two. Garde is a far better manager than Sherwood and he is having trouble with the garbage squad that they have. If Kane and Lamela didn't fuck up and Guzan didn't channel his inner American goalkeeper for once this seasons, then Spurs would have put at least 6 by them this weekend. They just look awful.

>>66194735
Plastic bends when it gets crushed

>>66195176
Plastic is a material that is harmful for the environment and never goes away no matter how hard we try. Basically, you are a useless piece of shit.

>sign a big target man for 35m (Andy Carroll)
>enormous flop
>team does incredibly well with small mobile attackers (Sterling, Sturridge, Suarez)
>decide to spend another 35m on a big target man
Who the fuck makes those decisions? It's times like these that make me think I could run a football club and do a decent job

>>66195259
It's like an autistic kid got access to his mom's credit card and just went for it on Ultimate Team.

>>66194626
> Liverpool to pay Benteke to leave the club?
> to pay to leave

what? is that something completely new in England that they need it to clarify?

The club ruins players.

>Klopps face when LVG puts out the same squad

:D

>>66195259
>sign a big target man for 35m (Andy Carroll)

To be fair, they also sold Torres for 50 million and bought Suarez for 22 million in that same month. Those are 2 of the best deals any team has made in the last 5 years.

>>66195657
that's not the point. Point is Carroll flopped and when they needed a striker they decided to buy Carroll v2.0.

They literally made the same mistake twice in the space of few years and it has cost them 70m

>>66195285
It's probably some premature contract termination payout thing.

>Irish Liverpool fans

there is nothing worse

>>66195715
no, it's about wages. Liverpool are paying him 120k a week, West Ham are only willing to offer 80k. So naturally, he's not going to flush 40k a week down the toilet and the only way to push this move through is for Liverpool to keep paying that 40k a week while he gets 80k from West Ham.

They did that when they offloaded Joe Cole