[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
your move belicheck
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 2
File: 2HaRFhP.jpg (37 KB, 861x503) Image search: [Google]
2HaRFhP.jpg
37 KB, 861x503
your move belicheck
>>
gay
>>
>
>>
what is le blitz
>>
>Three person stack is hard to tackle
An NCAA III player could easily take down people on top of each other.
>>
>>64669585
>you just need to take the first guy down and the ball will be thrown with little precision
>qb will mostly get intentional grounding and ints
>there will be 3 players to tackle one tower

No wonder the OP is a murrican

>hurr durr it's a bait
>niggers will tell themselves that
>>
>>64669085
wouldn't it make more sense to have the WR's standing on each others shoulders or do a simple boost higher than the defenders can reach since they can't be tackled before they already have completed the catch? you could throw super high balls without fear of interceptions
>>
Yeah, that works.
>>
Why even throw the ball with a 3 person stack? Since it's impossible to tackle they should just keep walking forward until they cross the goal line.
>>
>>64669754
Shitty o line m8.
>>
Simple. Have Brady's boy Trump build an even higher wall of defenders.
>>
>>64669647
Why would you be allowed to tackle someone who doesn't have the ball? Isn't that highly fucking illegal?
>>
Why can't you just have the QB hand the ball to a literal midget RB and the get the oversized FB to hurl the cunt into the endzone
>>
>>64669798
thank you for the mental image
>>
>>64669147
>>64669585
>>64669647

How would a 3 person stack be easier to tackle? The fact that it's more height and weight would make it harder than anything. It's just simple physics. And even if a 3 person stack WERE easy to tackle they'd only have to fall forward to make up the yardage. Assuming the three players are all about 6 ft (2 yards) tall and they fall forward that's an easy 6 yard gain.
Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.