>"the better team won"
>>63981903
>they just wanted it more
>They left it all on the field
>We've just got to go out there and play *insert team name here* *insert sport name here*
why the FUCK is this allowed?
<insert random white QB> is more athletic than people give him credit for.
>They let the ball speak for them
>>63981903
>a great guy on and off the field.
>the better team lost
> it all came down to fundamentals
>>63981903
>we just didn't make enough plays
>cheeky play
>we just gotta go out there and execute
>football has lost today
Why?
>it was a game of two halves
reminder at least half of the shit in these thread is legit commentary/analysis
>We'll be back
>the ref was a fucking cunt
>>63983055
thanks capt. obvious
>>63983127
no problem
seriously though whenever I point that shit out I get people disagreeing with me so yeah
>They didn't win it, we lost it.
>>63981903
completely possible, hence why a team loses
>>63981922
completely possible
>>63981933
shit one
>>63981967
shit one
>>63981987
shit one
>>63981995
shit one
>>63982405
completely possible
>>63982421
completely possible
>>63982429
completely possible
>>63982614
shit one
>>63982617
shit one
>>63982654
completely possible
>>63982712
very true in alot of cases
>>63982719
again, this is completely true
>>63983064
and they will, so again very true
>>63983093
completely possible
>>63983187
very true
dont know why you all complain, most of these are legit reasons why your shit team lost
>>63981992
>My income is higher that most countries
How is that a bad thing? Is liberalism a disease?
>>63983403
>missing the point that hard
It's not "My income is higher than the average in other countries", it's supposed to be "My paycheck to act this inane is higher than many countries' GDP". It's a fucking joke m8.
>He hit that one TOO WELL
>we just need to play a full *insert length of game time*
>we just need to simplify our game
>it's a tough building to play in
>they beat themselves
>>63981903
>injuries are not an excuse. Next man up
>"It's all about scoring one goal more than the opponent"
>"Sometimes you win, sometimes lose, sometimes draw."
>"Everything's possible if the ball is live"
>"Ball is round and there are two goals"
>"Ball can go through, the opponent - not"
Kazimierz Górski, genius
>>63982421
this, whenever I'm confused by what announcers/analysts are saying, I ask myself "what would the exact opposite of that statement sound like?" Most of the time they're wasting breath.
>ISIS is the JV team
